Effective learning requires time, comfort and peace so it is impossible to combine study and employment. Study and employment distract one from another. To what extent do you think the statements are realistic? Support your opinion with examples.

Essay topics:

Effective learning requires time, comfort and peace so it is impossible to combine study and employment. Study and employment distract one from another. To what extent do you think the statements are realistic? Support your opinion with examples.

The importance of studying along with employment was always a debatable topic. Even though many people claim that it is beneficial to enormous individuals in order to settle their career with the help of high skills achievement, other reject this notion and argue that learning needs sufficient time, comfort and peace to grasp concepts easily and effectively. The substantial influence of studying while working has sparked the controversy over the potential impact of this trend in recent years. In my opinion, the former proposition appears to be more rational. The following essay would further elaborate both positive and negative effects of learning along with working and thus lead to a plausible conclusion.

There are myriad of reasons that further explain this argument but the most preponderant one stems to the fact that studying from good institution might involve a good amount of money which can be handled by person's salary and also helps him or her to settle their career with good practical knowledge. For instance, specifically, a study conducted by the University of Oxford found that students who are engaged with both feel more confident and much more ready to face life challenges.

However, there are pitfalls that negate with this argument and that can certainly overwhelm the potential influence of whether someone should work while study or vise verse, but the most alarming one rooted to the fact that lack of money will not allow them to complete the education or learning which further can cause frustration in a person. Approach to deal with these concerns are numerous, but the most effective one learns while working or works on what you have learned which is impractical and unattainable but comprehensive and feasible.

According to argument aforementioned, one can reach to a conclusion that studying with employment helps to understand and apply the skills to build a strong platform and it is expected that people take cognizance of this fact and further the government should establish guidelines to educate people.

Votes
Average: 7.7 (1 vote)
Essay Categories

Comments

Grammar and spelling errors:
Line 1, column 210, Rule ID: POSSESIVE_APOSTROPHE[2]
Message: Possible typo: apostrophe is missing. Did you mean 'skills'' or 'skill's'?
Suggestion: skills'; skill's
...ttle their career with the help of high skills achievement, other reject this notion a...
^^^^^^
Line 3, column 209, Rule ID: POSSESIVE_APOSTROPHE[1]
Message: Possible typo: apostrophe is missing. Did you mean 'persons'' or 'person's'?
Suggestion: persons'; person's
...amount of money which can be handled by persons salary and also helps him or her to set...
^^^^^^^

Transition Words or Phrases used:
also, but, however, if, so, thus, while, for instance, in my opinion

Attributes: Values AverageValues Percentages(Values/AverageValues)% => Comments

Performance on Part of Speech:
To be verbs : 10.0 10.5418719212 95% => OK
Auxiliary verbs: 9.0 6.10837438424 147% => OK
Conjunction : 21.0 8.36945812808 251% => Less conjunction wanted
Relative clauses : 14.0 5.94088669951 236% => Less relative clauses wanted (maybe 'which' is over used).
Pronoun: 25.0 20.9802955665 119% => OK
Preposition: 44.0 31.9359605911 138% => OK
Nominalization: 16.0 5.75862068966 278% => Less nominalizations (nouns with a suffix like: tion ment ence ance) wanted.

Performance on vocabulary words:
No of characters: 1733.0 1207.87684729 143% => OK
No of words: 331.0 242.827586207 136% => Less content wanted.
Chars per words: 5.23564954683 5.00649968141 105% => OK
Fourth root words length: 4.26537283232 3.92707691288 109% => OK
Word Length SD: 2.75310309908 2.71678728327 101% => OK
Unique words: 190.0 139.433497537 136% => OK
Unique words percentage: 0.574018126888 0.580463131201 99% => OK
syllable_count: 530.1 379.143842365 140% => OK
avg_syllables_per_word: 1.6 1.57093596059 102% => OK

A sentence (or a clause, phrase) starts by:
Pronoun: 0.0 4.6157635468 0% => OK
Article: 5.0 1.56157635468 320% => Less articles wanted as sentence beginning.
Subordination: 1.0 1.71428571429 58% => OK
Conjunction: 2.0 0.931034482759 215% => Less conjunction wanted as sentence beginning.
Preposition: 2.0 3.65517241379 55% => More preposition wanted as sentence beginning.

Performance on sentences:
How many sentences: 10.0 12.6551724138 79% => Need more sentences. Double check the format of sentences, make sure there is a space between two sentences, or have enough periods. And also check the lengths of sentences, maybe they are too long.
Sentence length: 33.0 20.5024630542 161% => The Avg. Sentence Length is relatively long.
Sentence length SD: 93.2853686277 50.4703680194 185% => OK
Chars per sentence: 173.3 104.977214359 165% => OK
Words per sentence: 33.1 20.9669160288 158% => OK
Discourse Markers: 6.8 7.25397266985 94% => OK
Paragraphs: 4.0 4.12807881773 97% => OK
Language errors: 2.0 5.33497536946 37% => OK
Sentences with positive sentiment : 7.0 6.9802955665 100% => OK
Sentences with negative sentiment : 2.0 2.75862068966 72% => OK
Sentences with neutral sentiment: 1.0 2.91625615764 34% => More facts, knowledge or examples wanted.
What are sentences with positive/Negative/neutral sentiment?

Coherence and Cohesion:
Essay topic to essay body coherence: 0.206576848433 0.242375264174 85% => OK
Sentence topic coherence: 0.083025797033 0.0925447433944 90% => OK
Sentence topic coherence SD: 0.0335726603603 0.071462118173 47% => Sentences are similar to each other.
Paragraph topic coherence: 0.122388540707 0.151781067708 81% => OK
Paragraph topic coherence SD: 0.0308155595007 0.0609392437508 51% => OK

Essay readability:
automated_readability_index: 19.8 12.6369458128 157% => OK
flesch_reading_ease: 37.98 53.1260098522 71% => OK
smog_index: 8.8 6.54236453202 135% => OK
flesch_kincaid_grade: 16.2 10.9458128079 148% => OK
coleman_liau_index: 13.7 11.5310837438 119% => OK
dale_chall_readability_score: 9.42 8.32886699507 113% => OK
difficult_words: 87.0 55.0591133005 158% => OK
linsear_write_formula: 11.5 9.94827586207 116% => OK
gunning_fog: 15.2 10.3980295567 146% => OK
text_standard: 12.0 10.5123152709 114% => OK
What are above readability scores?

---------------------

Rates: 77.7777777778 out of 100
Scores by essay e-grader: 70.0 Out of 90
---------------------
Note: the e-grader does NOT examine the meaning of words and ideas. VIP users will receive further evaluations by advanced module of e-grader and human graders.