Some people think that maintaining public libraries is waste of public money and should be
replaced by virtual libraries. Discuss and give your opinion?
The library has always been known as the temple of knowledge where you will get comprehensive knowledge of every topic. While some people argue that the government should close these libraries because it is simply a waste of common people tax money. Other has a different opinion and they say libraries play an important role and it should be present. However, I agree that the library plays a key role in any individual life and the government should support it. Both of these views will be thoroughly discussed before reaching to a conclusion.
Firstly, the Common library is the place which is accessible to every common citizen. Any individual who belongs to a rich affluent background or poor family can easily access it and enhance their knowledge without spending a single penny. For instance, In today commercialization period education and books associated with it are invariably expensive, common people cannot afford it easily. So, the public institution should step-up and upgrade all old libraries.
On the other hand, Technology has been flourishing exponentially. Nevertheless, some of the developing and poor countries still do not have a suitable infrastructure in place so that they can facilitate computers and other compulsory instruments which are essential to building a virtual library. For example, Still, countries like Bangladesh and Pakistan does not have their own computers centers, how they can build a virtual library. So, sovereign like this should innovate and upgrade their existing libraries to boost their education.
To conclude, the Government should give provision and enhance virtual library but it should not cost on the public library. Since public libraries are the big source of information for all the classes and specifically for not well affluent people.
Grammar and spelling errors:
Line 9, column 81, Rule ID: SOME_OF_THE[1]
Message: Simply use 'some'.
Suggestion: some
...lourishing exponentially. Nevertheless, some of the developing and poor countries still do ...
^^^^^^^^^^^
Transition Words or Phrases used:
but, first, firstly, however, if, nevertheless, so, still, well, while, for example, for instance, on the other hand
Attributes: Values AverageValues Percentages(Values/AverageValues)% => Comments
Performance on Part of Speech:
To be verbs : 10.0 10.5418719212 95% => OK
Auxiliary verbs: 13.0 6.10837438424 213% => Less auxiliary verb wanted.
Conjunction : 14.0 8.36945812808 167% => OK
Relative clauses : 7.0 5.94088669951 118% => OK
Pronoun: 22.0 20.9802955665 105% => OK
Preposition: 24.0 31.9359605911 75% => OK
Nominalization: 11.0 5.75862068966 191% => OK
Performance on vocabulary words:
No of characters: 1532.0 1207.87684729 127% => OK
No of words: 285.0 242.827586207 117% => OK
Chars per words: 5.37543859649 5.00649968141 107% => OK
Fourth root words length: 4.10876417139 3.92707691288 105% => OK
Word Length SD: 2.90867246354 2.71678728327 107% => OK
Unique words: 164.0 139.433497537 118% => OK
Unique words percentage: 0.575438596491 0.580463131201 99% => OK
syllable_count: 476.1 379.143842365 126% => OK
avg_syllables_per_word: 1.7 1.57093596059 108% => OK
A sentence (or a clause, phrase) starts by:
Pronoun: 1.0 4.6157635468 22% => OK
Article: 4.0 1.56157635468 256% => Less articles wanted as sentence beginning.
Subordination: 2.0 1.71428571429 117% => OK
Conjunction: 0.0 0.931034482759 0% => OK
Preposition: 4.0 3.65517241379 109% => OK
Performance on sentences:
How many sentences: 15.0 12.6551724138 119% => OK
Sentence length: 19.0 20.5024630542 93% => OK
Sentence length SD: 39.5263062895 50.4703680194 78% => OK
Chars per sentence: 102.133333333 104.977214359 97% => OK
Words per sentence: 19.0 20.9669160288 91% => OK
Discourse Markers: 7.73333333333 7.25397266985 107% => OK
Paragraphs: 4.0 4.12807881773 97% => OK
Language errors: 1.0 5.33497536946 19% => OK
Sentences with positive sentiment : 8.0 6.9802955665 115% => OK
Sentences with negative sentiment : 4.0 2.75862068966 145% => OK
Sentences with neutral sentiment: 3.0 2.91625615764 103% => OK
What are sentences with positive/Negative/neutral sentiment?
Coherence and Cohesion:
Essay topic to essay body coherence: 0.278456362518 0.242375264174 115% => OK
Sentence topic coherence: 0.0861701869517 0.0925447433944 93% => OK
Sentence topic coherence SD: 0.0811639344441 0.071462118173 114% => OK
Paragraph topic coherence: 0.158067731664 0.151781067708 104% => OK
Paragraph topic coherence SD: 0.0784127106474 0.0609392437508 129% => OK
Essay readability:
automated_readability_index: 13.4 12.6369458128 106% => OK
flesch_reading_ease: 43.73 53.1260098522 82% => OK
smog_index: 8.8 6.54236453202 135% => OK
flesch_kincaid_grade: 11.9 10.9458128079 109% => OK
coleman_liau_index: 13.92 11.5310837438 121% => OK
dale_chall_readability_score: 8.73 8.32886699507 105% => OK
difficult_words: 75.0 55.0591133005 136% => OK
linsear_write_formula: 7.5 9.94827586207 75% => OK
gunning_fog: 9.6 10.3980295567 92% => OK
text_standard: 9.0 10.5123152709 86% => OK
What are above readability scores?
---------------------
Rates: 77.7777777778 out of 100
Scores by essay e-grader: 70.0 Out of 90
---------------------
Note: the e-grader does NOT examine the meaning of words and ideas. VIP users will receive further evaluations by advanced module of e-grader and human graders.