Some people think placing advertisements in schools is a great resource for public schools that need additionally funding, but others think it exploits children by treating them as a captive audience for corporate sponsors.
Choose which position you most agree with and discuss why you chose that position. Support your point of view with details from your own experiences, observations or reading.
Recently, the topical issue of advertisements has provoked a heated debate. Although contested fiercely by many, it is a widely held view that various publicity campaigns can be instrumental in preparing added budgets for schools. Providing compiled statistics, I will entirely agree with this statement before presenting my lines of argument.
From the economic standpoint, students at educational establishments seem ideal potential customers for intentions of businesses. These immature members of society are more easily attracted to purchase certain commercial products, whereas it would be demanding to allure experienced adults into buying wide-ranging products. As a few notable examples, the billboard posters, colorful flyers, and special offers in academic places can be cited often by some. Hardly ever has any other proof attested to advertisement gimmicks.
Furthermore, without the slightest doubt, many corporations merely promote the sales of their goods by heightening the social awareness in schools, in that most future clients of the articles spend their time in classes or schools. Not only will firm sponsors profit from their young and probably loyal customers, but they also enhance economic conditions for this generation in the future. The irrefutable and empirical evidence of this economic prosperity can primarily derive from the survey conducted in the Nordic countries in 2016, with establishing, if not substantiating a strong correlation between interest in publicized products and socioeconomic welfare, not to mention the economic development.
To conclude, notwithstanding the possible threat of exploitation, the practice of launching advertising programs in schools can benefit society enormously. Thus, my main contention is that it is both favorable and productive as long as it is regulated and monitored actively by official authorities concerned.
| Post date | Users | Rates | Link to Content |
|---|---|---|---|
| 2019-12-18 | Prabu | 77 | view |
| 2019-10-16 | Keiwan | 85 | view |
| 2019-04-27 | topraveesh | 85 | view |
| 2019-04-17 | ajayaryanone | 88 | view |
| 2019-03-12 | ahmedmemon_93 | 77 | view |
- Some people think placing advertisements in schools is a great resource for public schools that need additionally funding, but others think it exploits children by treating them as a captive audience for corporate sponsors.Choose which position you most a 77
- Should voting be compulsory for all citizens or people should have freedom to choose not to vote. What is your opinion? 85
- In a cashless society, people use more credit cards. What are the advantages and disadvantages of this phenomenon? 77
- In some countries around the world, voting is compulsory. Do you agree with the notion of compulsory voting? If voting is compulsory in a democratic society, what are come conclusions we can draw about the nature of democracy? 85
- Although many people think that the luxuries and conveniences of contemporary life are entirely harmless, in fact, they actually prevent people from developing into truly strong and independent individuals.State your opinion and support it with reasons an 77
Transition Words or Phrases used:
also, but, furthermore, if, so, thus, whereas
Attributes: Values AverageValues Percentages(Values/AverageValues)% => Comments
Performance on Part of Speech:
To be verbs : 8.0 10.5418719212 76% => OK
Auxiliary verbs: 7.0 6.10837438424 115% => OK
Conjunction : 8.0 8.36945812808 96% => OK
Relative clauses : 3.0 5.94088669951 50% => More relative clauses wanted.
Pronoun: 18.0 20.9802955665 86% => OK
Preposition: 38.0 31.9359605911 119% => OK
Nominalization: 11.0 5.75862068966 191% => OK
Performance on vocabulary words:
No of characters: 1618.0 1207.87684729 134% => OK
No of words: 276.0 242.827586207 114% => OK
Chars per words: 5.86231884058 5.00649968141 117% => OK
Fourth root words length: 4.07593519647 3.92707691288 104% => OK
Word Length SD: 3.2026854149 2.71678728327 118% => OK
Unique words: 197.0 139.433497537 141% => OK
Unique words percentage: 0.713768115942 0.580463131201 123% => OK
syllable_count: 504.0 379.143842365 133% => OK
avg_syllables_per_word: 1.8 1.57093596059 115% => OK
A sentence (or a clause, phrase) starts by:
Pronoun: 4.0 4.6157635468 87% => OK
Article: 4.0 1.56157635468 256% => Less articles wanted as sentence beginning.
Subordination: 3.0 1.71428571429 175% => OK
Conjunction: 2.0 0.931034482759 215% => Less conjunction wanted as sentence beginning.
Preposition: 5.0 3.65517241379 137% => OK
Performance on sentences:
How many sentences: 12.0 12.6551724138 95% => OK
Sentence length: 23.0 20.5024630542 112% => OK
Sentence length SD: 64.81297881 50.4703680194 128% => OK
Chars per sentence: 134.833333333 104.977214359 128% => OK
Words per sentence: 23.0 20.9669160288 110% => OK
Discourse Markers: 3.75 7.25397266985 52% => More transition words/phrases wanted.
Paragraphs: 4.0 4.12807881773 97% => OK
Language errors: 0.0 5.33497536946 0% => OK
Sentences with positive sentiment : 8.0 6.9802955665 115% => OK
Sentences with negative sentiment : 2.0 2.75862068966 72% => OK
Sentences with neutral sentiment: 2.0 2.91625615764 69% => OK
What are sentences with positive/Negative/neutral sentiment?
Coherence and Cohesion:
Essay topic to essay body coherence: 0.103867642093 0.242375264174 43% => OK
Sentence topic coherence: 0.0344347699525 0.0925447433944 37% => Sentence topic similarity is low.
Sentence topic coherence SD: 0.0248854774721 0.071462118173 35% => Sentences are similar to each other.
Paragraph topic coherence: 0.0557139358389 0.151781067708 37% => Maybe some paragraphs are off the topic.
Paragraph topic coherence SD: 0.00796204598473 0.0609392437508 13% => Paragraphs are similar to each other. Some content may get duplicated or it is not exactly right on the topic.
Essay readability:
automated_readability_index: 17.7 12.6369458128 140% => OK
flesch_reading_ease: 31.21 53.1260098522 59% => Flesch_reading_ease is low.
smog_index: 13.0 6.54236453202 199% => OK
flesch_kincaid_grade: 14.6 10.9458128079 133% => OK
coleman_liau_index: 17.0 11.5310837438 147% => OK
dale_chall_readability_score: 11.7 8.32886699507 140% => OK
difficult_words: 121.0 55.0591133005 220% => Less difficult words wanted.
linsear_write_formula: 9.0 9.94827586207 90% => OK
gunning_fog: 11.2 10.3980295567 108% => OK
text_standard: 12.0 10.5123152709 114% => OK
What are above readability scores?
---------------------
Rates: 77.7777777778 out of 100
Scores by essay e-grader: 70.0 Out of 90
---------------------
Note: the e-grader does NOT examine the meaning of words and ideas. VIP users will receive further evaluations by advanced module of e-grader and human graders.