Some people think placing advertisements in schools is a great resource for public schools that need additionally funding, but others think it exploits children by treating them as a captive audience for corporate sponsors.
Choose which position you most agree with and discuss why you chose that position. Support your point of view with details from your own experiences, observations or reading.
Recently, the phenomenon of placing advertisements in schools and its corresponding impacts have sparked a heated debate. Altough contested by many that the matter of complex procedures is highly beneficail, such issue is regarded thoroughly both constructive and consequently positive by a substantial number of individuals. I am inclined to believe that a great resource for public schools that need additionally funding can be a plus, and I will analyze that throughout this essay.
From a general standpoint, exploiting children by treating them can provide the society with some noticeable effects which are rooted in the facts that crucial issues, as well as ultimate outcomes, are inextricably bound up. According to my own experience, when I was a university student, I performed an academic experiment which discoverde current policies. Thus, benefical ramifications of both this common phenomenon and accordingly complicated procedures apparently can be seen.
Within the realm of a public arena, a captive audience for corporate sponsors might increase the consequences of critical needs. As tangibale example, some scientific research undertaken by a prestigious university has asserted that the downsides of creative processes is correlated negatively with vital issues. Hence, it is correct to presume the preconceived notion of this remarkable phenomenon.
To conclude, while there are several compelling arguments on both sides, I profoundly believe that the benefits of public training and improving of founding far outweigh its drawbacks. Not only do the advantages of this unique phenomenon prove the significance of total outcomes, but also pinpoint thorny issues’ potential implications.
Transition Words or Phrases used:
accordingly, also, apparently, but, consequently, hence, if, so, thus, well, while, as well as
Attributes: Values AverageValues Percentages(Values/AverageValues)% => Comments
Performance on Part of Speech:
To be verbs : 10.0 10.5418719212 95% => OK
Auxiliary verbs: 6.0 6.10837438424 98% => OK
Conjunction : 6.0 8.36945812808 72% => OK
Relative clauses : 10.0 5.94088669951 168% => OK
Pronoun: 21.0 20.9802955665 100% => OK
Preposition: 29.0 31.9359605911 91% => OK
Nominalization: 4.0 5.75862068966 69% => OK
Performance on vocabulary words:
No of characters: 1464.0 1207.87684729 121% => OK
No of words: 253.0 242.827586207 104% => OK
Chars per words: 5.78656126482 5.00649968141 116% => OK
Fourth root words length: 3.98822939669 3.92707691288 102% => OK
Word Length SD: 3.27631984749 2.71678728327 121% => OK
Unique words: 174.0 139.433497537 125% => OK
Unique words percentage: 0.687747035573 0.580463131201 118% => OK
syllable_count: 468.0 379.143842365 123% => OK
avg_syllables_per_word: 1.8 1.57093596059 115% => OK
A sentence (or a clause, phrase) starts by:
Pronoun: 4.0 4.6157635468 87% => OK
Article: 2.0 1.56157635468 128% => OK
Subordination: 4.0 1.71428571429 233% => Less adverbial clause wanted.
Conjunction: 2.0 0.931034482759 215% => Less conjunction wanted as sentence beginning.
Preposition: 4.0 3.65517241379 109% => OK
Performance on sentences:
How many sentences: 11.0 12.6551724138 87% => OK
Sentence length: 23.0 20.5024630542 112% => OK
Sentence length SD: 39.0904862556 50.4703680194 77% => OK
Chars per sentence: 133.090909091 104.977214359 127% => OK
Words per sentence: 23.0 20.9669160288 110% => OK
Discourse Markers: 8.54545454545 7.25397266985 118% => OK
Paragraphs: 4.0 4.12807881773 97% => OK
Language errors: 0.0 5.33497536946 0% => OK
Sentences with positive sentiment : 5.0 6.9802955665 72% => OK
Sentences with negative sentiment : 2.0 2.75862068966 72% => OK
Sentences with neutral sentiment: 4.0 2.91625615764 137% => OK
What are sentences with positive/Negative/neutral sentiment?
Coherence and Cohesion:
Essay topic to essay body coherence: 0.198281638757 0.242375264174 82% => OK
Sentence topic coherence: 0.0612926476054 0.0925447433944 66% => OK
Sentence topic coherence SD: 0.0706877101289 0.071462118173 99% => OK
Paragraph topic coherence: 0.0998910146798 0.151781067708 66% => OK
Paragraph topic coherence SD: 0.0657228817431 0.0609392437508 108% => OK
Essay readability:
automated_readability_index: 17.3 12.6369458128 137% => OK
flesch_reading_ease: 31.21 53.1260098522 59% => Flesch_reading_ease is low.
smog_index: 13.0 6.54236453202 199% => OK
flesch_kincaid_grade: 14.6 10.9458128079 133% => OK
coleman_liau_index: 16.6 11.5310837438 144% => OK
dale_chall_readability_score: 11.39 8.32886699507 137% => OK
difficult_words: 106.0 55.0591133005 193% => OK
linsear_write_formula: 15.0 9.94827586207 151% => OK
gunning_fog: 11.2 10.3980295567 108% => OK
text_standard: 15.0 10.5123152709 143% => OK
What are above readability scores?
---------------------
Rates: 88.8888888889 out of 100
Scores by essay e-grader: 80.0 Out of 90
---------------------
Note: the e-grader does NOT examine the meaning of words and ideas. VIP users will receive further evaluations by advanced module of e-grader and human graders.