Large shopping malls are replacing small shops. What is your opinion about this? Discuss with appropriate examples.

Essay topics:

Large shopping malls are replacing small shops. What is your opinion about this? Discuss with appropriate examples.

Recently, the phenomenon of large shopping and its corresponding impacts have sparked a heated debate. Although contested by many that the significance of replacing small shops is highly beneficial, such issue is regarded thoroughly both constructive and consequently positive by a substantial number of individuals. I am inclined to believe that online shopping can be a plus and I will analyze that throughout this essay.

From a general standpoint, online buying can provide the society with some noticeable effects which are rooted in the fact that goods, as well as ultimate outcomes, are inextricably bound up. According to my own experience, when I was a university students, I performed an academic experiment which discovered current policies. Thus, beneficial ramification of convinance location and complex center apparently can be seen.

Within the realm of public arena, supermarket might increase the consequences of large shoping malls. As a tangible example, some scientific research undertaken by a prestigious university has asserted that the downside of creative processes is correlated negatively with vital issues. Hence, it is correct to presume the preconceived notion of online purchasing.

To conclude, while there are several compelling arguments on both sides, I profoundly believe that the benefits of cheaper goods far outweigh its drawbacks. Not only do the advantages of expensive commidity prove the significance of total discount, but also pinpoint thorny issues’ potential implications.

Votes
Average: 8.8 (1 vote)
Essay Categories

Comments

Grammar and spelling errors:
Line 5, column 166, Rule ID: WHITESPACE_RULE
Message: Possible typo: you repeated a whitespace
Suggestion:
...some scientific research undertaken by a prestigious university has asserted that...
^^

Transition Words or Phrases used:
also, apparently, but, consequently, hence, if, so, thus, well, while, as well as

Attributes: Values AverageValues Percentages(Values/AverageValues)% => Comments

Performance on Part of Speech:
To be verbs : 10.0 10.5418719212 95% => OK
Auxiliary verbs: 5.0 6.10837438424 82% => OK
Conjunction : 5.0 8.36945812808 60% => More conjunction wanted.
Relative clauses : 9.0 5.94088669951 151% => OK
Pronoun: 16.0 20.9802955665 76% => OK
Preposition: 26.0 31.9359605911 81% => OK
Nominalization: 7.0 5.75862068966 122% => OK

Performance on vocabulary words:
No of characters: 1312.0 1207.87684729 109% => OK
No of words: 227.0 242.827586207 93% => More content wanted.
Chars per words: 5.77973568282 5.00649968141 115% => OK
Fourth root words length: 3.88156143495 3.92707691288 99% => OK
Word Length SD: 3.23445831393 2.71678728327 119% => OK
Unique words: 162.0 139.433497537 116% => OK
Unique words percentage: 0.713656387665 0.580463131201 123% => OK
syllable_count: 418.5 379.143842365 110% => OK
avg_syllables_per_word: 1.8 1.57093596059 115% => OK

A sentence (or a clause, phrase) starts by:
Pronoun: 4.0 4.6157635468 87% => OK
Article: 1.0 1.56157635468 64% => OK
Subordination: 5.0 1.71428571429 292% => Less adverbial clause wanted.
Conjunction: 1.0 0.931034482759 107% => OK
Preposition: 4.0 3.65517241379 109% => OK

Performance on sentences:
How many sentences: 11.0 12.6551724138 87% => OK
Sentence length: 20.0 20.5024630542 98% => OK
Sentence length SD: 43.0271872538 50.4703680194 85% => OK
Chars per sentence: 119.272727273 104.977214359 114% => OK
Words per sentence: 20.6363636364 20.9669160288 98% => OK
Discourse Markers: 7.36363636364 7.25397266985 102% => OK
Paragraphs: 4.0 4.12807881773 97% => OK
Language errors: 1.0 5.33497536946 19% => OK
Sentences with positive sentiment : 6.0 6.9802955665 86% => OK
Sentences with negative sentiment : 1.0 2.75862068966 36% => More negative sentences wanted.
Sentences with neutral sentiment: 4.0 2.91625615764 137% => OK
What are sentences with positive/Negative/neutral sentiment?

Coherence and Cohesion:
Essay topic to essay body coherence: 0.105269015652 0.242375264174 43% => OK
Sentence topic coherence: 0.0328990445139 0.0925447433944 36% => Sentence topic similarity is low.
Sentence topic coherence SD: 0.0360275008664 0.071462118173 50% => OK
Paragraph topic coherence: 0.0540901717233 0.151781067708 36% => Maybe some paragraphs are off the topic.
Paragraph topic coherence SD: 0.0586917712685 0.0609392437508 96% => OK

Essay readability:
automated_readability_index: 16.1 12.6369458128 127% => OK
flesch_reading_ease: 34.26 53.1260098522 64% => OK
smog_index: 11.2 6.54236453202 171% => OK
flesch_kincaid_grade: 13.5 10.9458128079 123% => OK
coleman_liau_index: 16.24 11.5310837438 141% => OK
dale_chall_readability_score: 11.1 8.32886699507 133% => OK
difficult_words: 93.0 55.0591133005 169% => OK
linsear_write_formula: 11.5 9.94827586207 116% => OK
gunning_fog: 10.0 10.3980295567 96% => OK
text_standard: 12.0 10.5123152709 114% => OK
What are above readability scores?

---------------------

Rates: 88.8888888889 out of 100
Scores by essay e-grader: 80.0 Out of 90
---------------------
Note: the e-grader does NOT examine the meaning of words and ideas. VIP users will receive further evaluations by advanced module of e-grader and human graders.