Some people think that technology improves the quality of life whereas others feel that creates a new problem that threatens the quality of life. Discuss both views and suggest your opinion.
In the contemporary times, there is a dramatic boom in technology which has changed the quality of life. There are a great number of people who interpret the advancement in technology as the constructive and positive impact on quality of life, while there are a number of people who believe that it is detrimental to the quality of life. And, I am inclined to believe that the benefits of technology overweigh its problems. This will explain with pertinent examples and aspects in further paragraphs.
There are myriad of reasons in favour of my stance, one of the most prominent supporting reason is technology has a pivotal role in the medical field. For instance, treatment of disease like Cancer was near to impossible which is now possible if diagnosed at right time, this improves the health. Next, an Internet that connects the world and subsequently makes it a global village. Thereby, technology improves health and knowledge of the person which will eventually improve the quality of life.
On contrary, there is another stratum of society who believes that the technology is responsible for the drastic change in environment. With the increase in transport and industries have risen the pollution level which has adverse effects on health. For an instance, last year the pollution level of Delhi has reached the level which is equal to inhaling of 10 cigarettes a day. Hence, this illustrates that it has the threat to the life.
In conclusion, everything has pros and cons. We must be vigilant to eliminate the cons and this is possible if we can have right perception and perspective towards the use of technology and individual and government should pay attention and take preventive measures.
Transition Words or Phrases used:
hence, if, so, while, for instance, in conclusion
Attributes: Values AverageValues Percentages(Values/AverageValues)% => Comments
Performance on Part of Speech:
To be verbs : 13.0 10.5418719212 123% => OK
Auxiliary verbs: 5.0 6.10837438424 82% => OK
Conjunction : 11.0 8.36945812808 131% => OK
Relative clauses : 13.0 5.94088669951 219% => Less relative clauses wanted (maybe 'which' is over used).
Pronoun: 17.0 20.9802955665 81% => OK
Preposition: 38.0 31.9359605911 119% => OK
Nominalization: 10.0 5.75862068966 174% => OK
Performance on vocabulary words:
No of characters: 1434.0 1207.87684729 119% => OK
No of words: 283.0 242.827586207 117% => OK
Chars per words: 5.06713780919 5.00649968141 101% => OK
Fourth root words length: 4.10153676581 3.92707691288 104% => OK
Word Length SD: 2.846376939 2.71678728327 105% => OK
Unique words: 153.0 139.433497537 110% => OK
Unique words percentage: 0.540636042403 0.580463131201 93% => More unique words wanted or less content wanted.
syllable_count: 457.2 379.143842365 121% => OK
avg_syllables_per_word: 1.6 1.57093596059 102% => OK
A sentence (or a clause, phrase) starts by:
Pronoun: 5.0 4.6157635468 108% => OK
Article: 1.0 1.56157635468 64% => OK
Subordination: 1.0 1.71428571429 58% => OK
Conjunction: 0.0 0.931034482759 0% => OK
Preposition: 4.0 3.65517241379 109% => OK
Performance on sentences:
How many sentences: 14.0 12.6551724138 111% => OK
Sentence length: 20.0 20.5024630542 98% => OK
Sentence length SD: 52.6269601894 50.4703680194 104% => OK
Chars per sentence: 102.428571429 104.977214359 98% => OK
Words per sentence: 20.2142857143 20.9669160288 96% => OK
Discourse Markers: 3.5 7.25397266985 48% => More transition words/phrases wanted.
Paragraphs: 4.0 4.12807881773 97% => OK
Language errors: 0.0 5.33497536946 0% => OK
Sentences with positive sentiment : 7.0 6.9802955665 100% => OK
Sentences with negative sentiment : 3.0 2.75862068966 109% => OK
Sentences with neutral sentiment: 4.0 2.91625615764 137% => OK
What are sentences with positive/Negative/neutral sentiment?
Coherence and Cohesion:
Essay topic to essay body coherence: 0.195586109919 0.242375264174 81% => OK
Sentence topic coherence: 0.0653689462897 0.0925447433944 71% => OK
Sentence topic coherence SD: 0.0893409374753 0.071462118173 125% => OK
Paragraph topic coherence: 0.108340255635 0.151781067708 71% => OK
Paragraph topic coherence SD: 0.0895565189842 0.0609392437508 147% => OK
Essay readability:
automated_readability_index: 12.6 12.6369458128 100% => OK
flesch_reading_ease: 51.18 53.1260098522 96% => OK
smog_index: 8.8 6.54236453202 135% => OK
flesch_kincaid_grade: 11.1 10.9458128079 101% => OK
coleman_liau_index: 12.13 11.5310837438 105% => OK
dale_chall_readability_score: 8.53 8.32886699507 102% => OK
difficult_words: 70.0 55.0591133005 127% => OK
linsear_write_formula: 11.0 9.94827586207 111% => OK
gunning_fog: 10.0 10.3980295567 96% => OK
text_standard: 9.0 10.5123152709 86% => OK
What are above readability scores?
---------------------
Rates: 77.7777777778 out of 100
Scores by essay e-grader: 70.0 Out of 90
---------------------
Note: the e-grader does NOT examine the meaning of words and ideas. VIP users will receive further evaluations by advanced module of e-grader and human graders.