Some people think that technology improves the quality of life whereas others feel that creates a new problem that threatens the quality of life. Discuss both views and suggest your opinion.
Recently, the phenomenon of Some people and its corresponding impact has sparked a heated debate. Although contested by many that the matter of people issues is highly beneficial, such issue is regarded thoroughly both constructive and positive by a substantial number of individuals. I am inclined to believe that technology managements can be a plus, and I will analyze that throughout this essay.
From a social standpoint, technologies can provide the society with some noticeable effects which are rooted in the fact that merits of problems studies, as well as the role of quality of life, are inextricably bound up. According to my own experience, when I was a university student, I performed an academic experiment which discovered people requirements. Thus, beneficial ramifications of both the role of technology and problems issues apparently can be seen.
Within the realm of science, the quality of life might increase the consequences of people facts. Moreover, fundamental aspects of technology could relate to this reality that the demerits of the quality of life strategies pertain to the role of problem. As a tangible example, some scientific research undertaken by a prestigious university has asserted that the downside of people improvement is correlated negatively with technology requirements. Hence, it is correct to presume the preconceived notion of life issues.
To conclude, while there are several compelling arguments on both sides, I profoundly believe that the benefits of creates a new problem far outweigh its drawbacks. Not only do the advantages of problem analysis prove the significance of people policies, but also pinpoint technology studies implications
Transition Words or Phrases used:
also, apparently, but, hence, if, moreover, so, thus, well, while, as well as
Attributes: Values AverageValues Percentages(Values/AverageValues)% => Comments
Performance on Part of Speech:
To be verbs : 10.0 10.5418719212 95% => OK
Auxiliary verbs: 6.0 6.10837438424 98% => OK
Conjunction : 5.0 8.36945812808 60% => More conjunction wanted.
Relative clauses : 10.0 5.94088669951 168% => OK
Pronoun: 18.0 20.9802955665 86% => OK
Preposition: 37.0 31.9359605911 116% => OK
Nominalization: 5.0 5.75862068966 87% => OK
Performance on vocabulary words:
No of characters: 1439.0 1207.87684729 119% => OK
No of words: 261.0 242.827586207 107% => OK
Chars per words: 5.51340996169 5.00649968141 110% => OK
Fourth root words length: 4.0193898071 3.92707691288 102% => OK
Word Length SD: 3.22179622789 2.71678728327 119% => OK
Unique words: 159.0 139.433497537 114% => OK
Unique words percentage: 0.609195402299 0.580463131201 105% => OK
syllable_count: 465.3 379.143842365 123% => OK
avg_syllables_per_word: 1.8 1.57093596059 115% => OK
A sentence (or a clause, phrase) starts by:
Pronoun: 4.0 4.6157635468 87% => OK
Article: 2.0 1.56157635468 128% => OK
Subordination: 5.0 1.71428571429 292% => Less adverbial clause wanted.
Conjunction: 2.0 0.931034482759 215% => Less conjunction wanted as sentence beginning.
Preposition: 4.0 3.65517241379 109% => OK
Performance on sentences:
How many sentences: 12.0 12.6551724138 95% => OK
Sentence length: 21.0 20.5024630542 102% => OK
Sentence length SD: 43.4300203392 50.4703680194 86% => OK
Chars per sentence: 119.916666667 104.977214359 114% => OK
Words per sentence: 21.75 20.9669160288 104% => OK
Discourse Markers: 6.41666666667 7.25397266985 88% => OK
Paragraphs: 4.0 4.12807881773 97% => OK
Language errors: 0.0 5.33497536946 0% => OK
Sentences with positive sentiment : 7.0 6.9802955665 100% => OK
Sentences with negative sentiment : 1.0 2.75862068966 36% => More negative sentences wanted.
Sentences with neutral sentiment: 4.0 2.91625615764 137% => OK
What are sentences with positive/Negative/neutral sentiment?
Coherence and Cohesion:
Essay topic to essay body coherence: 0.303226840609 0.242375264174 125% => OK
Sentence topic coherence: 0.0984697106069 0.0925447433944 106% => OK
Sentence topic coherence SD: 0.0535506054103 0.071462118173 75% => OK
Paragraph topic coherence: 0.166124057245 0.151781067708 109% => OK
Paragraph topic coherence SD: 0.0717129496693 0.0609392437508 118% => OK
Essay readability:
automated_readability_index: 15.4 12.6369458128 122% => OK
flesch_reading_ease: 33.24 53.1260098522 63% => OK
smog_index: 11.2 6.54236453202 171% => OK
flesch_kincaid_grade: 13.8 10.9458128079 126% => OK
coleman_liau_index: 14.68 11.5310837438 127% => OK
dale_chall_readability_score: 10.36 8.32886699507 124% => OK
difficult_words: 94.0 55.0591133005 171% => OK
linsear_write_formula: 15.0 9.94827586207 151% => OK
gunning_fog: 10.4 10.3980295567 100% => OK
text_standard: 15.0 10.5123152709 143% => OK
What are above readability scores?
---------------------
Rates: 88.8888888889 out of 100
Scores by essay e-grader: 80.0 Out of 90
---------------------
Note: the e-grader does NOT examine the meaning of words and ideas. VIP users will receive further evaluations by advanced module of e-grader and human graders.