Some people think that top level authorities of a company should always take suggestions or ideas from employees to take any decisions while other disagree. Discuss only positives
To reflect top position in bar chart and show imperative bonus trend in market, companies always prepare strategies in background in this world. Some people believe that accepting new ideas or recommendations from members in venture always positive while making decisions and other believe that it provides negative results. In this essay I shall discuss positives after acquiring good ideas from employee and provide the logical conclusion.
Firstly, person working in organization either at lower or top rank have right to share the best possible method to raise the growth. Management can not levy the decision on employees direct without validate consequences. Member shares idea to company's regime about the process as feedback or suggest new alternative plans always commendable. There are many methods to fulfill the requirement of process to complete which can be suggest by actual doer. Doer can share the upper management with cost cutting and efficient process with retaining resources.
Secondly, employers needs vote system in place to get agree or disagree from members of organization. This way, company would be having lots of ideas and ways, which espouse the company to track the progress and ease of mechanism to allow in growth. For example releasing new policy should be adherence the flexibility of employees. It is mandate to have discuss with team leaders.
In recapitulate, while there are profound and ubiquitous advantages, management must take ideas or suggestions from employees. In my personal views, venture must indulge employees leader in their vital decisions.
Grammar and spelling errors:
Line 2, column 1, Rule ID: WHITESPACE_RULE
Message: Possible typo: you repeated a whitespace
Suggestion:
...ee and provide the logical conclusion. Firstly, person working in organization ...
^^
Line 3, column 1, Rule ID: WHITESPACE_RULE
Message: Possible typo: you repeated a whitespace
Suggestion:
...ient process with retaining resources. Secondly, employers needs vote system in...
^^
Line 3, column 357, Rule ID: HAVE_PART_AGREEMENT[1]
Message: Use past participle here: 'discussed'.
Suggestion: discussed
...ity of employees. It is mandate to have discuss with team leaders. In recapitulate, ...
^^^^^^^
Line 4, column 1, Rule ID: WHITESPACE_RULE
Message: Possible typo: you repeated a whitespace
Suggestion:
...ate to have discuss with team leaders. In recapitulate, while there are profoun...
^^
Transition Words or Phrases used:
first, firstly, second, secondly, so, while, for example
Attributes: Values AverageValues Percentages(Values/AverageValues)% => Comments
Performance on Part of Speech:
To be verbs : 6.0 10.5418719212 57% => More to be verbs wanted.
Auxiliary verbs: 8.0 6.10837438424 131% => OK
Conjunction : 12.0 8.36945812808 143% => OK
Relative clauses : 4.0 5.94088669951 67% => More relative clauses wanted.
Pronoun: 10.0 20.9802955665 48% => OK
Preposition: 40.0 31.9359605911 125% => OK
Nominalization: 8.0 5.75862068966 139% => OK
Performance on vocabulary words:
No of characters: 1350.0 1207.87684729 112% => OK
No of words: 248.0 242.827586207 102% => OK
Chars per words: 5.4435483871 5.00649968141 109% => OK
Fourth root words length: 3.96837696647 3.92707691288 101% => OK
Word Length SD: 2.78705757141 2.71678728327 103% => OK
Unique words: 164.0 139.433497537 118% => OK
Unique words percentage: 0.661290322581 0.580463131201 114% => OK
syllable_count: 420.3 379.143842365 111% => OK
avg_syllables_per_word: 1.7 1.57093596059 108% => OK
A sentence (or a clause, phrase) starts by:
Pronoun: 2.0 4.6157635468 43% => OK
Article: 0.0 1.56157635468 0% => OK
Subordination: 1.0 1.71428571429 58% => OK
Conjunction: 0.0 0.931034482759 0% => OK
Preposition: 4.0 3.65517241379 109% => OK
Performance on sentences:
How many sentences: 14.0 12.6551724138 111% => OK
Sentence length: 17.0 20.5024630542 83% => The Avg. Sentence Length is relatively short.
Sentence length SD: 31.6779070634 50.4703680194 63% => OK
Chars per sentence: 96.4285714286 104.977214359 92% => OK
Words per sentence: 17.7142857143 20.9669160288 84% => OK
Discourse Markers: 4.0 7.25397266985 55% => More transition words/phrases wanted.
Paragraphs: 4.0 4.12807881773 97% => OK
Language errors: 4.0 5.33497536946 75% => OK
Sentences with positive sentiment : 11.0 6.9802955665 158% => OK
Sentences with negative sentiment : 2.0 2.75862068966 72% => OK
Sentences with neutral sentiment: 1.0 2.91625615764 34% => More facts, knowledge or examples wanted.
What are sentences with positive/Negative/neutral sentiment?
Coherence and Cohesion:
Essay topic to essay body coherence: 0.296073940168 0.242375264174 122% => OK
Sentence topic coherence: 0.0844759675262 0.0925447433944 91% => OK
Sentence topic coherence SD: 0.0718020575314 0.071462118173 100% => OK
Paragraph topic coherence: 0.159741996934 0.151781067708 105% => OK
Paragraph topic coherence SD: 0.0795114552123 0.0609392437508 130% => OK
Essay readability:
automated_readability_index: 13.0 12.6369458128 103% => OK
flesch_reading_ease: 45.76 53.1260098522 86% => OK
smog_index: 8.8 6.54236453202 135% => OK
flesch_kincaid_grade: 11.1 10.9458128079 101% => OK
coleman_liau_index: 13.98 11.5310837438 121% => OK
dale_chall_readability_score: 9.45 8.32886699507 113% => OK
difficult_words: 78.0 55.0591133005 142% => OK
linsear_write_formula: 11.0 9.94827586207 111% => OK
gunning_fog: 8.8 10.3980295567 85% => OK
text_standard: 9.0 10.5123152709 86% => OK
What are above readability scores?
---------------------
Rates: 77.7777777778 out of 100
Scores by essay e-grader: 70.0 Out of 90
---------------------
Note: the e-grader does NOT examine the meaning of words and ideas. VIP users will receive further evaluations by advanced module of e-grader and human graders.