Some people think women should be given equal chances to work & excel in their careers. Others believes that a women's role should be limited to taking care of the house and children. Which opinion do you agree with why.
The implication of women should be given equal chances of work, but other think that women’s role should be limited to taking care of the house and children, which is fairly debatable has now gained further attention from numerous arenas. The sizeable influence of this subject has generated controversy over the potential impact of this subject. I agree with this statement and this will further discussed before reaching a logical conclusion.
At the outset, there are diverse reasons why this subject is considered as vital, but the most conspicuous one stems from the fact that women have more carefulness as well as they are very active toward their work. For example in United States there government give more preference to women for work.
In addition, now days ladies are educated as compared to men. Initially, also encourage international trade. Furthermore, it can be effective tool.
The importance of women should be given chances of work, but other think that women’s should be limited to taking care of the house and children can be debated, but the fact remains that there were several factors that lead to this and matter. Eventually, according to above analysis, it can be concluded that women should be given equal chances of work. It can be predicted that in the near further.
Grammar and spelling errors:
Line 1, column 403, Rule ID: DID_BASEFORM[1]
Message: The verb 'will' requires the base form of the verb: 'discuss'
Suggestion: discuss
...th this statement and this will further discussed before reaching a logical conclusion. ...
^^^^^^^^^
Line 6, column 315, Rule ID: WHITESPACE_RULE
Message: Possible typo: you repeated a whitespace
Suggestion:
...above analysis, it can be concluded that women should be given equal chances of w...
^^^
Transition Words or Phrases used:
also, but, furthermore, so, well, for example, in addition, as well as
Attributes: Values AverageValues Percentages(Values/AverageValues)% => Comments
Performance on Part of Speech:
To be verbs : 15.0 10.5418719212 142% => OK
Auxiliary verbs: 10.0 6.10837438424 164% => OK
Conjunction : 8.0 8.36945812808 96% => OK
Relative clauses : 8.0 5.94088669951 135% => OK
Pronoun: 19.0 20.9802955665 91% => OK
Preposition: 27.0 31.9359605911 85% => OK
Nominalization: 8.0 5.75862068966 139% => OK
Performance on vocabulary words:
No of characters: 1101.0 1207.87684729 91% => OK
No of words: 216.0 242.827586207 89% => More content wanted.
Chars per words: 5.09722222222 5.00649968141 102% => OK
Fourth root words length: 3.83365862548 3.92707691288 98% => OK
Word Length SD: 2.63929090505 2.71678728327 97% => OK
Unique words: 122.0 139.433497537 87% => More unique words wanted.
Unique words percentage: 0.564814814815 0.580463131201 97% => OK
syllable_count: 346.5 379.143842365 91% => OK
avg_syllables_per_word: 1.6 1.57093596059 102% => OK
A sentence (or a clause, phrase) starts by:
Pronoun: 4.0 4.6157635468 87% => OK
Article: 3.0 1.56157635468 192% => OK
Subordination: 0.0 1.71428571429 0% => More adverbial clause wanted.
Conjunction: 4.0 0.931034482759 430% => Less conjunction wanted as sentence beginning.
Preposition: 3.0 3.65517241379 82% => OK
Performance on sentences:
How many sentences: 11.0 12.6551724138 87% => OK
Sentence length: 19.0 20.5024630542 93% => OK
Sentence length SD: 76.0320723975 50.4703680194 151% => OK
Chars per sentence: 100.090909091 104.977214359 95% => OK
Words per sentence: 19.6363636364 20.9669160288 94% => OK
Discourse Markers: 6.36363636364 7.25397266985 88% => OK
Paragraphs: 4.0 4.12807881773 97% => OK
Language errors: 2.0 5.33497536946 37% => OK
Sentences with positive sentiment : 8.0 6.9802955665 115% => OK
Sentences with negative sentiment : 0.0 2.75862068966 0% => More negative sentences wanted.
Sentences with neutral sentiment: 3.0 2.91625615764 103% => OK
What are sentences with positive/Negative/neutral sentiment?
Coherence and Cohesion:
Essay topic to essay body coherence: 0.445518788533 0.242375264174 184% => OK
Sentence topic coherence: 0.149547819917 0.0925447433944 162% => OK
Sentence topic coherence SD: 0.177554761454 0.071462118173 248% => The coherence between sentences is low.
Paragraph topic coherence: 0.236013225769 0.151781067708 155% => OK
Paragraph topic coherence SD: 0.16801662 0.0609392437508 276% => More connections among paragraphs wanted.
Essay readability:
automated_readability_index: 12.4 12.6369458128 98% => OK
flesch_reading_ease: 52.19 53.1260098522 98% => OK
smog_index: 8.8 6.54236453202 135% => OK
flesch_kincaid_grade: 10.7 10.9458128079 98% => OK
coleman_liau_index: 12.3 11.5310837438 107% => OK
dale_chall_readability_score: 8.38 8.32886699507 101% => OK
difficult_words: 52.0 55.0591133005 94% => OK
linsear_write_formula: 14.5 9.94827586207 146% => OK
gunning_fog: 9.6 10.3980295567 92% => OK
text_standard: 10.0 10.5123152709 95% => OK
What are above readability scores?
---------------------
Rates: 72.2222222222 out of 100
Scores by essay e-grader: 65.0 Out of 90
---------------------
Note: the e-grader does NOT examine the meaning of words and ideas. VIP users will receive further evaluations by advanced module of e-grader and human graders.