Some types of employment are suitable for men and other types of employment are more appropriate for women.
To what extent do you agree with this statement? support your answer with reasons and examples from your own experience.
The importance of the suitable employment, which was always debateable, has now become more controversial. The most substantial influence of suitable employment, has sparked the controversy over the potential impact of this trend over the years. It can be agreed that jobs are beneficial for both men and women. This essay will elaborate that which employment is suitable for men and which is more appropriate for women and thus will lead to the logical conclusion.
At the outset, there are numerous ways how different types of employment are appropriate for men and women, but the most conspicuous one stem from the fact that gender does not make any impact on choosing a job, if a women is perfect for an employment than she should be get hired. As an illustration, everyone should have same opportunities for all types of employment. Moreover, many people says that men will be better for this position, this trend must be finish now a days. Thus, by this way both men and women should be treated equally in all sorts of employment.
Nevertheless, there remains some drawbacks, which can certainly overwhelm the potential impact of the appropriate employment but the most alarming one is rooted in the fact that some jobs are not suitable for women. For example, jobs where probability of risk will be high, such as security jobs at the risky venues. Furthermore, women should avoid those kinds of employment. Thus, because of that some jobs may not be good for women.
For what has been discussed above, it can be concluded that the impact of the suitable employment is prominent, and the way risky jobs are discussed should be well-handled.
| Post date | Users | Rates | Link to Content |
|---|---|---|---|
| 2018-10-29 | Muhammad Khaleeq | 70 | view |
| 2018-04-14 | priyanka pinky | 62 | view |
| 2017-11-26 | maryam2 | 77 | view |
| 2017-11-26 | maryam2 | 72 | view |
- The ability to learn more than one language will be less important in future. Do you agree or disagree? 77
- Personal development is the base for professional development and advancing in one's career. To what extent do you agree or disagree? 88
- In my countries, the proportion of older people is steadily increasing. Does this trend has more positive or negative effects on society? 85
- More information available online these days so library books are useless. 85
- In a cashless society, people use more credit cards. What are the advantages and disadvantages of this phenomenon? 77
Grammar and spelling errors:
Line 3, column 216, Rule ID: A_PLURAL[1]
Message: Don't use indefinite articles with plural words. Did you mean 'a woman' or simply 'women'?
Suggestion: a woman; women
...t make any impact on choosing a job, if a women is perfect for an employment than she s...
^^^^^^^
Line 3, column 218, Rule ID: WOMAN_WOMEN[1]
Message: 'woman' is the singular form of 'women'. Consider using 'woman'?
Suggestion: woman
...make any impact on choosing a job, if a women is perfect for an employment than she s...
^^^^^
Line 3, column 272, Rule ID: SHOULD_BE_DO[1]
Message: Did you mean 'got', 'gotten'?
Suggestion: got; gotten
...ct for an employment than she should be get hired. As an illustration, everyone sho...
^^^
Line 3, column 468, Rule ID: NOW_A_DAYS[1]
Message: Did you mean 'nowadays'?
Suggestion: nowadays
...his position, this trend must be finish now a days. Thus, by this way both men and women s...
^^^^^^^^^^
Line 3, column 472, Rule ID: A_PLURAL[1]
Message: Don't use indefinite articles with plural words. Did you mean 'a day' or simply 'days'?
Suggestion: a day; days
...position, this trend must be finish now a days. Thus, by this way both men and women s...
^^^^^^
Transition Words or Phrases used:
but, furthermore, if, may, moreover, nevertheless, so, thus, well, for example, such as
Attributes: Values AverageValues Percentages(Values/AverageValues)% => Comments
Performance on Part of Speech:
To be verbs : 21.0 10.5418719212 199% => OK
Auxiliary verbs: 14.0 6.10837438424 229% => Less auxiliary verb wanted.
Conjunction : 8.0 8.36945812808 96% => OK
Relative clauses : 12.0 5.94088669951 202% => Less relative clauses wanted (maybe 'which' is over used).
Pronoun: 16.0 20.9802955665 76% => OK
Preposition: 22.0 31.9359605911 69% => OK
Nominalization: 14.0 5.75862068966 243% => Less nominalizations (nouns with a suffix like: tion ment ence ance) wanted.
Performance on vocabulary words:
No of characters: 1380.0 1207.87684729 114% => OK
No of words: 278.0 242.827586207 114% => OK
Chars per words: 4.96402877698 5.00649968141 99% => OK
Fourth root words length: 4.08329915638 3.92707691288 104% => OK
Word Length SD: 2.81179942997 2.71678728327 103% => OK
Unique words: 137.0 139.433497537 98% => OK
Unique words percentage: 0.492805755396 0.580463131201 85% => More unique words wanted or less content wanted.
syllable_count: 417.6 379.143842365 110% => OK
avg_syllables_per_word: 1.5 1.57093596059 95% => OK
A sentence (or a clause, phrase) starts by:
Pronoun: 4.0 4.6157635468 87% => OK
Article: 2.0 1.56157635468 128% => OK
Subordination: 3.0 1.71428571429 175% => OK
Conjunction: 2.0 0.931034482759 215% => Less conjunction wanted as sentence beginning.
Preposition: 3.0 3.65517241379 82% => OK
Performance on sentences:
How many sentences: 13.0 12.6551724138 103% => OK
Sentence length: 21.0 20.5024630542 102% => OK
Sentence length SD: 63.29250215 50.4703680194 125% => OK
Chars per sentence: 106.153846154 104.977214359 101% => OK
Words per sentence: 21.3846153846 20.9669160288 102% => OK
Discourse Markers: 6.69230769231 7.25397266985 92% => OK
Paragraphs: 4.0 4.12807881773 97% => OK
Language errors: 5.0 5.33497536946 94% => OK
Sentences with positive sentiment : 7.0 6.9802955665 100% => OK
Sentences with negative sentiment : 4.0 2.75862068966 145% => OK
Sentences with neutral sentiment: 2.0 2.91625615764 69% => OK
What are sentences with positive/Negative/neutral sentiment?
Coherence and Cohesion:
Essay topic to essay body coherence: 0.271048100373 0.242375264174 112% => OK
Sentence topic coherence: 0.110173996985 0.0925447433944 119% => OK
Sentence topic coherence SD: 0.0649793315267 0.071462118173 91% => OK
Paragraph topic coherence: 0.177878622699 0.151781067708 117% => OK
Paragraph topic coherence SD: 0.0482770507636 0.0609392437508 79% => OK
Essay readability:
automated_readability_index: 12.6 12.6369458128 100% => OK
flesch_reading_ease: 58.62 53.1260098522 110% => OK
smog_index: 3.1 6.54236453202 47% => Smog_index is low.
flesch_kincaid_grade: 10.3 10.9458128079 94% => OK
coleman_liau_index: 11.49 11.5310837438 100% => OK
dale_chall_readability_score: 7.75 8.32886699507 93% => OK
difficult_words: 54.0 55.0591133005 98% => OK
linsear_write_formula: 11.0 9.94827586207 111% => OK
gunning_fog: 10.4 10.3980295567 100% => OK
text_standard: 11.0 10.5123152709 105% => OK
What are above readability scores?
---------------------
Rates: 70.0 out of 100
Scores by essay e-grader: 63.0 Out of 90
---------------------
Note: the e-grader does NOT examine the meaning of words and ideas. VIP users will receive further evaluations by advanced module of e-grader and human graders.