Some types of employment are more suitable for men and other types of employment are more appropriate for women.
To what extent do you agree with this statement? Support your point of view with reasons and examples from your own experience.
In past there is difference between males and females that only males should work. Now-a-days situation is changed as males and females are working in all fields, but still there are some employments that are only suitable for men or women.
On one hand, the males are more energetic than women. The fields like construction and engineering work are required more strength. So for that reason the females are not accepted for these type of works. For example, the women doesn’t have much strength to do the labor work because they are not physically strong. Additionally, there are far more senior males than women. This may have less to do suitability and more to do other factors such as education, expectation of the family and social beliefs.
On the other hand, there are some jobs which are related to women such as nursing and caring. Women have more positiveness, concern than men, child care and other. For instance, women can care about the children because they are basically have the responsibility of caring. Women have good communications with the ability to empathize.
By this it can be conclude that, there no difference between men and women there is only difference in the employment. There are many works which are related to different genders
Grammar and spelling errors:
Line 3, column 239, Rule ID: BEEN_PART_AGREEMENT[2]
Message: Consider using a past participle here: 'had'.
Suggestion: had
...the children because they are basically have the responsibility of caring. Women hav...
^^^^
Transition Words or Phrases used:
but, if, may, so, still, for example, for instance, such as, on the other hand
Attributes: Values AverageValues Percentages(Values/AverageValues)% => Comments
Performance on Part of Speech:
To be verbs : 17.0 10.5418719212 161% => OK
Auxiliary verbs: 4.0 6.10837438424 65% => OK
Conjunction : 10.0 8.36945812808 119% => OK
Relative clauses : 6.0 5.94088669951 101% => OK
Pronoun: 10.0 20.9802955665 48% => OK
Preposition: 21.0 31.9359605911 66% => OK
Nominalization: 9.0 5.75862068966 156% => OK
Performance on vocabulary words:
No of characters: 1061.0 1207.87684729 88% => OK
No of words: 213.0 242.827586207 88% => More content wanted.
Chars per words: 4.98122065728 5.00649968141 99% => OK
Fourth root words length: 3.82027741392 3.92707691288 97% => OK
Word Length SD: 2.64958491183 2.71678728327 98% => OK
Unique words: 113.0 139.433497537 81% => More unique words wanted.
Unique words percentage: 0.530516431925 0.580463131201 91% => More unique words wanted or less content wanted.
syllable_count: 346.5 379.143842365 91% => OK
avg_syllables_per_word: 1.6 1.57093596059 102% => OK
A sentence (or a clause, phrase) starts by:
Pronoun: 1.0 4.6157635468 22% => OK
Article: 3.0 1.56157635468 192% => OK
Subordination: 0.0 1.71428571429 0% => More adverbial clause wanted.
Conjunction: 1.0 0.931034482759 107% => OK
Preposition: 4.0 3.65517241379 109% => OK
Performance on sentences:
How many sentences: 14.0 12.6551724138 111% => OK
Sentence length: 15.0 20.5024630542 73% => The Avg. Sentence Length is relatively short.
Sentence length SD: 30.6144557025 50.4703680194 61% => OK
Chars per sentence: 75.7857142857 104.977214359 72% => OK
Words per sentence: 15.2142857143 20.9669160288 73% => OK
Discourse Markers: 5.57142857143 7.25397266985 77% => OK
Paragraphs: 4.0 4.12807881773 97% => OK
Language errors: 1.0 5.33497536946 19% => OK
Sentences with positive sentiment : 7.0 6.9802955665 100% => OK
Sentences with negative sentiment : 2.0 2.75862068966 72% => OK
Sentences with neutral sentiment: 5.0 2.91625615764 171% => OK
What are sentences with positive/Negative/neutral sentiment?
Coherence and Cohesion:
Essay topic to essay body coherence: 0.258899920636 0.242375264174 107% => OK
Sentence topic coherence: 0.0910730599051 0.0925447433944 98% => OK
Sentence topic coherence SD: 0.0544908831192 0.071462118173 76% => OK
Paragraph topic coherence: 0.139736448288 0.151781067708 92% => OK
Paragraph topic coherence SD: 0.0723213626166 0.0609392437508 119% => OK
Essay readability:
automated_readability_index: 9.6 12.6369458128 76% => Automated_readability_index is low.
flesch_reading_ease: 56.25 53.1260098522 106% => OK
smog_index: 3.1 6.54236453202 47% => Smog_index is low.
flesch_kincaid_grade: 9.1 10.9458128079 83% => OK
coleman_liau_index: 11.01 11.5310837438 95% => OK
dale_chall_readability_score: 7.49 8.32886699507 90% => OK
difficult_words: 42.0 55.0591133005 76% => More difficult words wanted.
linsear_write_formula: 6.5 9.94827586207 65% => OK
gunning_fog: 8.0 10.3980295567 77% => OK
text_standard: 10.0 10.5123152709 95% => OK
What are above readability scores?
---------------------
Rates: 62.2222222222 out of 100
Scores by essay e-grader: 56.0 Out of 90
---------------------
Note: the e-grader does NOT examine the meaning of words and ideas. VIP users will receive further evaluations by advanced module of e-grader and human graders.