Some universities deduct marks from students' works if given in late, what are your views and what action will you recommend to take?
In recent years, the trend that college universities deduct marks from students' work if given task submitted late was always a debatable topic. Parents and many people argue that deducting academic marks is not proper way of dealing and recommends to educational departments to implement other methods. I strongly disagree with the statement and I personally feel students' will be deprived. This essay would further discuss my views and actions that need to be taken with justifying reasons.
First and foremost, in fast running world, children are dumped with many subjects and asked to write assignments for all the topics. Sometimes, the project work given by the faculty or college may not be understandable to them and those students wait for others to complete the task to copy assignments from them. For example, the topic provided on global warming may not be clear to few students those who has low grasping abilities. Universities and schools has to come up with structured way of learning explaining the task before given instead of cutting the marks.
Furthermore, reducing academic score creates an discrimination among them and they will be in mindset that teachers are treating them as low academic abilities. This will decrease the self confidence of children. The best solution that is recommended to handle this situation is lectures or teaching staff has to sit with low scoring students and ask them the problems or concerns they are facing while submitting task. This will help to build relationship between teacher and student. In addition, institutions must provide certain guidelines and instill discipline and make them punctual.
To summarize, I strongly recommend educational departments to introduce new methods to submit the given tasks and provide separate classes to submit the assigned work. In a nutshell, it can be concluded that reducing marks is not the best way
- The belching and unauthorized behavior is unacceptable in modern offices How far you support this view Give your response with justification 60
- Students with degree earn high salary than who doesn’t have an academic qualification. Therefore, some argue that they have to pay the full cost of their courses. Give your opinion? 77
- Large shopping malls are replacing small shops. What is your opinion on this? Do you think this is a good or bad change? 72
- Government should reduce their investment in arts, music and painting. Agree or disagree 85
- Effective learning requires time, comfort and peace so it is impossible to combine study and employment. Study and employment distract one from another. To what extent do you think the statements are realistic? Support your opinion with examples. 77
Grammar and spelling errors:
Line 3, column 382, Rule ID: TO_TOO
Message: Did you mean 'too'?
...ided on global warming may not be clear to few students those who has low grasping...
Line 3, column 508, Rule ID: AFFORD_VBG
Message: This verb is used with infinitive: 'to explain'.
Suggestion: to explain
...come up with structured way of learning explaining the task before given instead of cuttin...
Line 5, column 46, Rule ID: EN_A_VS_AN
Message: Use 'a' instead of 'an' if the following word doesn't start with a vowel sound, e.g. 'a sentence', 'a university'
...ermore, reducing academic score creates an discrimination among them and they will...
Transition Words or Phrases used:
first, furthermore, if, may, so, still, while, as to, for example, in addition
Attributes: Values AverageValues Percentages(Values/AverageValues)% => Comments
Performance on Part of Speech:
To be verbs : 14.0 10.5418719212 133% => OK
Auxiliary verbs: 10.0 6.10837438424 164% => OK
Conjunction : 17.0 8.36945812808 203% => Less conjunction wanted
Relative clauses : 7.0 5.94088669951 118% => OK
Pronoun: 25.0 20.9802955665 119% => OK
Preposition: 38.0 31.9359605911 119% => OK
Nominalization: 7.0 5.75862068966 122% => OK
Performance on vocabulary words:
No of characters: 1605.0 1207.87684729 133% => OK
No of words: 305.0 242.827586207 126% => OK
Chars per words: 5.26229508197 5.00649968141 105% => OK
Fourth root words length: 4.17902490978 3.92707691288 106% => OK
Word Length SD: 2.80615134186 2.71678728327 103% => OK
Unique words: 181.0 139.433497537 130% => OK
Unique words percentage: 0.593442622951 0.580463131201 102% => OK
syllable_count: 479.7 379.143842365 127% => OK
avg_syllables_per_word: 1.6 1.57093596059 102% => OK
A sentence (or a clause, phrase) starts by:
Pronoun: 6.0 4.6157635468 130% => OK
Article: 4.0 1.56157635468 256% => Less articles wanted as sentence beginning.
Subordination: 0.0 1.71428571429 0% => More adverbial clause wanted.
Conjunction: 0.0 0.931034482759 0% => OK
Preposition: 5.0 3.65517241379 137% => OK
Performance on sentences:
How many sentences: 15.0 12.6551724138 119% => OK
Sentence length: 20.0 20.5024630542 98% => OK
Sentence length SD: 43.4569518796 50.4703680194 86% => OK
Chars per sentence: 107.0 104.977214359 102% => OK
Words per sentence: 20.3333333333 20.9669160288 97% => OK
Discourse Markers: 5.2 7.25397266985 72% => OK
Paragraphs: 4.0 4.12807881773 97% => OK
Language errors: 3.0 5.33497536946 56% => OK
Sentences with positive sentiment : 6.0 6.9802955665 86% => OK
Sentences with negative sentiment : 6.0 2.75862068966 217% => Less negative sentences wanted.
Sentences with neutral sentiment: 3.0 2.91625615764 103% => OK
What are sentences with positive/Negative/neutral sentiment?
Coherence and Cohesion:
Essay topic to essay body coherence: 0.199891811648 0.242375264174 82% => OK
Sentence topic coherence: 0.0671978711404 0.0925447433944 73% => OK
Sentence topic coherence SD: 0.060042574354 0.071462118173 84% => OK
Paragraph topic coherence: 0.12726195707 0.151781067708 84% => OK
Paragraph topic coherence SD: 0.0757469603647 0.0609392437508 124% => OK
automated_readability_index: 13.5 12.6369458128 107% => OK
flesch_reading_ease: 51.18 53.1260098522 96% => OK
smog_index: 8.8 6.54236453202 135% => OK
flesch_kincaid_grade: 11.1 10.9458128079 101% => OK
coleman_liau_index: 13.23 11.5310837438 115% => OK
dale_chall_readability_score: 9.08 8.32886699507 109% => OK
difficult_words: 86.0 55.0591133005 156% => OK
linsear_write_formula: 11.0 9.94827586207 111% => OK
gunning_fog: 10.0 10.3980295567 96% => OK
text_standard: 10.0 10.5123152709 95% => OK
What are above readability scores?
Rates: 77.7777777778 out of 100
Scores by essay e-grader: 70.0 Out of 90
Note: the e-grader does NOT examine the meaning of words and ideas. VIP users will receive further evaluations by advanced module of e-grader and human graders.