Some universities deduct students’ work if assignment is given late. What is your opinion and suggest some alternative actions?
The influence of some universities deducting students’ work if assignment is given late, which was always debatable, now has become more controversial. The substantial influence of universities cutting marks on students’ assignments has sparked controversy over the potential impact of this trend on the whole student group in recent years. It can be agreed that university’s deduction on student’s assignments plays a vital role for students, though it has drawbacks. This essay will elaborate on how deduction can improve students’ time management ability and how email reminders also can also benefit students, and thus will lead to a logical conclusion.
At the outset, there are numerable reasons why university deduction can bring some benefits for all students, but the most conspicuous one stems from the fact that deduction measures can improve students’ time management ability. As an illustration, the research has invariably revealed that students’ on-time submission rate of Duke University has dramatically increased three times compared with 2017 after deduction measures have been introduced to students. Therefore, university deduction measures bring a positive impact to students.
Nevertheless, some people adopt an opposing view and tend to believe that university deduction is harmful to students. Stanford University professors have to think about new ways of submitting given assignment work on time. The best solution for this is that lecturers can send an email reminder and ask them the problems or concerns that they are facing in submitting tasks. By using this method, the submission rate of students also has consecutively increased, and students also feel less pressure on their assignments.
In conclusion, from what has been discussed above, it can be concluded that the impact of university deduction is prominent, whereas email reminder is also a useful action.
Grammar and spelling errors:
Line 5, column 274, Rule ID: SEND_AN_EMAIL[1]
Message: Consider using 'email'.
Suggestion: email
...solution for this is that lecturers can send an email reminder and ask them the problems or c...
^^^^^^^^^^^^^
Transition Words or Phrases used:
also, but, if, nevertheless, so, therefore, thus, whereas, in conclusion, on the whole
Attributes: Values AverageValues Percentages(Values/AverageValues)% => Comments
Performance on Part of Speech:
To be verbs : 12.0 10.5418719212 114% => OK
Auxiliary verbs: 9.0 6.10837438424 147% => OK
Conjunction : 7.0 8.36945812808 84% => OK
Relative clauses : 8.0 5.94088669951 135% => OK
Pronoun: 17.0 20.9802955665 81% => OK
Preposition: 32.0 31.9359605911 100% => OK
Nominalization: 16.0 5.75862068966 278% => Less nominalizations (nouns with a suffix like: tion ment ence ance) wanted.
Performance on vocabulary words:
No of characters: 1653.0 1207.87684729 137% => OK
No of words: 288.0 242.827586207 119% => OK
Chars per words: 5.73958333333 5.00649968141 115% => OK
Fourth root words length: 4.11953428781 3.92707691288 105% => OK
Word Length SD: 3.2653051744 2.71678728327 120% => OK
Unique words: 167.0 139.433497537 120% => OK
Unique words percentage: 0.579861111111 0.580463131201 100% => OK
syllable_count: 513.0 379.143842365 135% => OK
avg_syllables_per_word: 1.8 1.57093596059 115% => OK
A sentence (or a clause, phrase) starts by:
Pronoun: 3.0 4.6157635468 65% => OK
Article: 5.0 1.56157635468 320% => Less articles wanted as sentence beginning.
Subordination: 2.0 1.71428571429 117% => OK
Conjunction: 3.0 0.931034482759 322% => Less conjunction wanted as sentence beginning.
Preposition: 5.0 3.65517241379 137% => OK
Performance on sentences:
How many sentences: 12.0 12.6551724138 95% => OK
Sentence length: 24.0 20.5024630542 117% => OK
Sentence length SD: 46.7121058542 50.4703680194 93% => OK
Chars per sentence: 137.75 104.977214359 131% => OK
Words per sentence: 24.0 20.9669160288 114% => OK
Discourse Markers: 7.16666666667 7.25397266985 99% => OK
Paragraphs: 4.0 4.12807881773 97% => OK
Language errors: 1.0 5.33497536946 19% => OK
Sentences with positive sentiment : 10.0 6.9802955665 143% => OK
Sentences with negative sentiment : 1.0 2.75862068966 36% => More negative sentences wanted.
Sentences with neutral sentiment: 1.0 2.91625615764 34% => More facts, knowledge or examples wanted.
What are sentences with positive/Negative/neutral sentiment?
Coherence and Cohesion:
Essay topic to essay body coherence: 0.336154910536 0.242375264174 139% => OK
Sentence topic coherence: 0.138894636916 0.0925447433944 150% => OK
Sentence topic coherence SD: 0.0946726994044 0.071462118173 132% => OK
Paragraph topic coherence: 0.201261863274 0.151781067708 133% => OK
Paragraph topic coherence SD: 0.0749631479488 0.0609392437508 123% => OK
Essay readability:
automated_readability_index: 17.6 12.6369458128 139% => OK
flesch_reading_ease: 30.2 53.1260098522 57% => Flesch_reading_ease is low.
smog_index: 11.2 6.54236453202 171% => OK
flesch_kincaid_grade: 15.0 10.9458128079 137% => OK
coleman_liau_index: 16.31 11.5310837438 141% => OK
dale_chall_readability_score: 9.27 8.32886699507 111% => OK
difficult_words: 81.0 55.0591133005 147% => OK
linsear_write_formula: 16.0 9.94827586207 161% => OK
gunning_fog: 11.6 10.3980295567 112% => OK
text_standard: 12.0 10.5123152709 114% => OK
What are above readability scores?
---------------------
Rates: 85.0 out of 100
Scores by essay e-grader: 76.5 Out of 90
---------------------
Note: the e-grader does NOT examine the meaning of words and ideas. VIP users will receive further evaluations by advanced module of e-grader and human graders.