The importance of not including sports and games in secondary school timetable, which was always debatable has now become more controversial. The influence of inclusion of extracurricular activities has sparked the controversy over the impact of this trend on the secondary school timetable. It can be said that games should be included in the timetable as they have a myriad of benefits for the students. This essay will elaborate how playing sports acts as an important learning environment and how it helps the children focus on their studies and thus will come to a logical conclusion.
At the outset, there are a number of reasons why sports and games should be included in secondary school timetable, but the most preponderant one stems from the fact that it acts as an important learning environment for children. For instance, a study of 200 children showed that they were able to develop various unteachable skills by participating in sports at school. Furthermore, by playing sports, children develop physical skills, learn to be a team member, learn about play fair, improve self-esteem, and so on. Games and sports, therefore, have to be included in secondary school timetable.
Another key justification to support this notion stems from the fact that participating in sports improves blood circulation in the body which makes the kids mentally agile. For example, numerous studies have shown that children who play sports perform better at school. Furthermore, they are able to study well do mental work better which aids them to excel in the real world. Hence, games and sports should be a vital part of their curriculum.
From what has been discussed above, one can conclude that games and sports acts as an important learning environment and the way it helps them focus on their studies should be well handled.
Transition Words or Phrases used:
but, furthermore, hence, if, second, so, therefore, thus, well, for example, for instance
Attributes: Values AverageValues Percentages(Values/AverageValues)% => Comments
Performance on Part of Speech:
To be verbs : 12.0 10.5418719212 114% => OK
Auxiliary verbs: 8.0 6.10837438424 131% => OK
Conjunction : 10.0 8.36945812808 119% => OK
Relative clauses : 10.0 5.94088669951 168% => OK
Pronoun: 21.0 20.9802955665 100% => OK
Preposition: 38.0 31.9359605911 119% => OK
Nominalization: 8.0 5.75862068966 139% => OK
Performance on vocabulary words:
No of characters: 1541.0 1207.87684729 128% => OK
No of words: 300.0 242.827586207 124% => OK
Chars per words: 5.13666666667 5.00649968141 103% => OK
Fourth root words length: 4.16179145029 3.92707691288 106% => OK
Word Length SD: 2.82070716114 2.71678728327 104% => OK
Unique words: 151.0 139.433497537 108% => OK
Unique words percentage: 0.503333333333 0.580463131201 87% => More unique words wanted or less content wanted.
syllable_count: 457.2 379.143842365 121% => OK
avg_syllables_per_word: 1.5 1.57093596059 95% => OK
A sentence (or a clause, phrase) starts by:
Pronoun: 3.0 4.6157635468 65% => OK
Article: 3.0 1.56157635468 192% => OK
Subordination: 0.0 1.71428571429 0% => More adverbial clause wanted.
Conjunction: 2.0 0.931034482759 215% => Less conjunction wanted as sentence beginning.
Preposition: 3.0 3.65517241379 82% => OK
Performance on sentences:
How many sentences: 13.0 12.6551724138 103% => OK
Sentence length: 23.0 20.5024630542 112% => OK
Sentence length SD: 44.9419085924 50.4703680194 89% => OK
Chars per sentence: 118.538461538 104.977214359 113% => OK
Words per sentence: 23.0769230769 20.9669160288 110% => OK
Discourse Markers: 6.84615384615 7.25397266985 94% => OK
Paragraphs: 4.0 4.12807881773 97% => OK
Language errors: 0.0 5.33497536946 0% => OK
Sentences with positive sentiment : 10.0 6.9802955665 143% => OK
Sentences with negative sentiment : 0.0 2.75862068966 0% => More negative sentences wanted.
Sentences with neutral sentiment: 3.0 2.91625615764 103% => OK
What are sentences with positive/Negative/neutral sentiment?
Coherence and Cohesion:
Essay topic to essay body coherence: 0.364377045939 0.242375264174 150% => OK
Sentence topic coherence: 0.156789374776 0.0925447433944 169% => OK
Sentence topic coherence SD: 0.120937923764 0.071462118173 169% => OK
Paragraph topic coherence: 0.230649502058 0.151781067708 152% => OK
Paragraph topic coherence SD: 0.0814152915161 0.0609392437508 134% => OK
Essay readability:
automated_readability_index: 14.3 12.6369458128 113% => OK
flesch_reading_ease: 56.59 53.1260098522 107% => OK
smog_index: 8.8 6.54236453202 135% => OK
flesch_kincaid_grade: 11.1 10.9458128079 101% => OK
coleman_liau_index: 12.83 11.5310837438 111% => OK
dale_chall_readability_score: 8.15 8.32886699507 98% => OK
difficult_words: 64.0 55.0591133005 116% => OK
linsear_write_formula: 12.5 9.94827586207 126% => OK
gunning_fog: 11.2 10.3980295567 108% => OK
text_standard: 13.0 10.5123152709 124% => OK
What are above readability scores?
---------------------
Rates: 55.5555555556 out of 100
Scores by essay e-grader: 50.0 Out of 90
---------------------
Note: the e-grader does NOT examine the meaning of words and ideas. VIP users will receive further evaluations by advanced module of e-grader and human graders.