Over the past few decades, there has been a high degree of ambivalence over this matter whether traveling to study is overrated. This has elicited disputed stimulation among the public. Even though we have brilliant scholars who studied locally I still believe that travel is really necessary for tertiary studies. This essay will further elaborate reasons to support this notion and then deduce a logical conclusion.
At the outset, conspicuously, there are myriads of reasons to support this notion but one of the most compelling reasons is that it is hard to learn about the people and their culture without experiencing their lifestyle. This can only be possible if the student travels the tertiary and live among the people. Another cogent reason is that a traveling person would always have the better understanding than a local scholar. For example, Scholars studying locally will have less exposure and knowledge and hence, would not be able to explain the local environment properly. Whereas, the traveling scholar will have the far superior knowledge and would have the better understanding to explain on the subject.
On the contrary, there are sceptics who conjecture that, this is the time of Information Technology. Now we get all the required Information from the internet. Furthermore, we can interact with the people there using the video conferencing. Although this seems ostensibly veridical still this does not give the amount of information to the local as the scholar traveling and living there.
In Conclusion, After analyzing the above facts It can be clearly said that Travelling to study is not overrated, and a traveling scholar will always have more effective knowledge than the one studying remotely.
Grammar and spelling errors:
Line 1, column 131, Rule ID: UPPERCASE_SENTENCE_START
Message: This sentence does not start with an uppercase letter
Suggestion: This
...ether travelling to study is overrated. this has elicited desputated stimulation amo...
^^^^
Line 3, column 414, Rule ID: A_PLURAL[2]
Message: Don't use indefinite articles with plural words. Did you mean 'scholar'?
Suggestion: scholar
... have better understanding then a local scholars. For example, Scholars studying locally...
^^^^^^^^
Line 7, column 181, Rule ID: LESS_MORE_THEN[1]
Message: Did you mean 'than'?
Suggestion: than
...ll always have more effective knowledge then the one studying remotely.
^^^^
Transition Words or Phrases used:
but, furthermore, hence, if, really, so, still, then, whereas, for example, in conclusion, on the contrary
Attributes: Values AverageValues Percentages(Values/AverageValues)% => Comments
Performance on Part of Speech:
To be verbs : 13.0 10.5418719212 123% => OK
Auxiliary verbs: 10.0 6.10837438424 164% => OK
Conjunction : 9.0 8.36945812808 108% => OK
Relative clauses : 8.0 5.94088669951 135% => OK
Pronoun: 22.0 20.9802955665 105% => OK
Preposition: 28.0 31.9359605911 88% => OK
Nominalization: 5.0 5.75862068966 87% => OK
Performance on vocabulary words:
No of characters: 1432.0 1207.87684729 119% => OK
No of words: 271.0 242.827586207 112% => OK
Chars per words: 5.28413284133 5.00649968141 106% => OK
Fourth root words length: 4.05734859645 3.92707691288 103% => OK
Word Length SD: 2.76737022922 2.71678728327 102% => OK
Unique words: 155.0 139.433497537 111% => OK
Unique words percentage: 0.571955719557 0.580463131201 99% => OK
syllable_count: 447.3 379.143842365 118% => OK
avg_syllables_per_word: 1.7 1.57093596059 108% => OK
A sentence (or a clause, phrase) starts by:
Pronoun: 4.0 4.6157635468 87% => OK
Article: 1.0 1.56157635468 64% => OK
Subordination: 3.0 1.71428571429 175% => OK
Conjunction: 1.0 0.931034482759 107% => OK
Preposition: 5.0 3.65517241379 137% => OK
Performance on sentences:
How many sentences: 14.0 12.6551724138 111% => OK
Sentence length: 19.0 20.5024630542 93% => OK
Sentence length SD: 46.6616676137 50.4703680194 92% => OK
Chars per sentence: 102.285714286 104.977214359 97% => OK
Words per sentence: 19.3571428571 20.9669160288 92% => OK
Discourse Markers: 7.57142857143 7.25397266985 104% => OK
Paragraphs: 4.0 4.12807881773 97% => OK
Language errors: 3.0 5.33497536946 56% => OK
Sentences with positive sentiment : 7.0 6.9802955665 100% => OK
Sentences with negative sentiment : 1.0 2.75862068966 36% => More negative sentences wanted.
Sentences with neutral sentiment: 6.0 2.91625615764 206% => Less facts, knowledge or examples wanted.
What are sentences with positive/Negative/neutral sentiment?
Coherence and Cohesion:
Essay topic to essay body coherence: 0.374282438463 0.242375264174 154% => OK
Sentence topic coherence: 0.121240484421 0.0925447433944 131% => OK
Sentence topic coherence SD: 0.122813413519 0.071462118173 172% => OK
Paragraph topic coherence: 0.232362972766 0.151781067708 153% => OK
Paragraph topic coherence SD: 0.0846299303988 0.0609392437508 139% => OK
Essay readability:
automated_readability_index: 13.1 12.6369458128 104% => OK
flesch_reading_ease: 43.73 53.1260098522 82% => OK
smog_index: 8.8 6.54236453202 135% => OK
flesch_kincaid_grade: 11.9 10.9458128079 109% => OK
coleman_liau_index: 13.34 11.5310837438 116% => OK
dale_chall_readability_score: 9.07 8.32886699507 109% => OK
difficult_words: 77.0 55.0591133005 140% => OK
linsear_write_formula: 12.0 9.94827586207 121% => OK
gunning_fog: 9.6 10.3980295567 92% => OK
text_standard: 12.0 10.5123152709 114% => OK
What are above readability scores?
---------------------
Rates: 85.0 out of 100
Scores by essay e-grader: 76.5 Out of 90
---------------------
Note: the e-grader does NOT examine the meaning of words and ideas. VIP users will receive further evaluations by advanced module of e-grader and human graders.