STUDYING IN THE UK QUESTION
I have selected to pursue master degree in clinical ophthalmology and vision research in three different universities: University College London "Institute of Ophthalmology ", Glasgow Caledonian University, and University of Manchester "Faculty of Biology, Medicine and Health". All three universities have an international reputation for the quality of their researches and teaching methods which will fill my current needs. I believe that with my determination, independence and communication skills I can successfully complete any of the three programmes I have selected.
As I have already completed my Egyptian master degree in Ophthalmology, and passed two steps of FRCS Glasgow, yet, I would like to expand my clinical knowledge through applying at this course as a practical training to prepare myself for the third part of FRCS which is an oral and clinical exam. Practicing the ability of analytical thinking and finding out the diagnosis in a professional way, is my target from this course.
Grammar and spelling errors:
Line 3, column 298, Rule ID: WHITESPACE_RULE
Message: Possible typo: you repeated a whitespace
Suggestion:
...RCS which is an oral and clinical exam. Practicing the ability of analytical thi...
^^
Line 3, column 376, Rule ID: IN_A_X_MANNER[1]
Message: Consider replacing "in a professional way" with adverb for "professional"; eg, "in a hasty manner" with "hastily".
... thinking and finding out the diagnosis in a professional way, is my target from this course.
^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^
Transition Words or Phrases used:
if, third
Attributes: Values AverageValues Percentages(Values/AverageValues)% => Comments
Performance on Part of Speech:
To be verbs : 2.0 10.5418719212 19% => More to be verbs wanted.
Auxiliary verbs: 3.0 6.10837438424 49% => OK
Conjunction : 8.0 8.36945812808 96% => OK
Relative clauses : 3.0 5.94088669951 50% => More relative clauses wanted.
Pronoun: 16.0 20.9802955665 76% => OK
Preposition: 21.0 31.9359605911 66% => OK
Nominalization: 4.0 5.75862068966 69% => OK
Performance on vocabulary words:
No of characters: 872.0 1207.87684729 72% => OK
No of words: 154.0 242.827586207 63% => More content wanted.
Chars per words: 5.66233766234 5.00649968141 113% => OK
Fourth root words length: 3.52273666998 3.92707691288 90% => OK
Word Length SD: 3.47685890076 2.71678728327 128% => OK
Unique words: 103.0 139.433497537 74% => More unique words wanted.
Unique words percentage: 0.668831168831 0.580463131201 115% => OK
syllable_count: 277.2 379.143842365 73% => OK
avg_syllables_per_word: 1.8 1.57093596059 115% => OK
A sentence (or a clause, phrase) starts by:
Pronoun: 3.0 4.6157635468 65% => OK
Article: 0.0 1.56157635468 0% => OK
Subordination: 1.0 1.71428571429 58% => OK
Conjunction: 2.0 0.931034482759 215% => Less conjunction wanted as sentence beginning.
Preposition: 0.0 3.65517241379 0% => More preposition wanted as sentence beginning.
Performance on sentences:
How many sentences: 5.0 12.6551724138 40% => Need more sentences. Double check the format of sentences, make sure there is a space between two sentences, or have enough periods. And also check the lengths of sentences, maybe they are too long.
Sentence length: 30.0 20.5024630542 146% => The Avg. Sentence Length is relatively long.
Sentence length SD: 76.7114072352 50.4703680194 152% => OK
Chars per sentence: 174.4 104.977214359 166% => OK
Words per sentence: 30.8 20.9669160288 147% => OK
Discourse Markers: 1.8 7.25397266985 25% => More transition words/phrases wanted.
Paragraphs: 2.0 4.12807881773 48% => More paragraphs wanted.
Language errors: 2.0 5.33497536946 37% => OK
Sentences with positive sentiment : 4.0 6.9802955665 57% => More positive sentences wanted.
Sentences with negative sentiment : 0.0 2.75862068966 0% => More negative sentences wanted.
Sentences with neutral sentiment: 1.0 2.91625615764 34% => More facts, knowledge or examples wanted.
What are sentences with positive/Negative/neutral sentiment?
Coherence and Cohesion:
Essay topic to essay body coherence: 0.0 0.242375264174 0% => The similarity between the topic and the content is low.
Sentence topic coherence: 0.0 0.0925447433944 0% => Sentence topic similarity is low.
Sentence topic coherence SD: 0.0 0.071462118173 0% => Sentences are similar to each other.
Paragraph topic coherence: 0.0 0.151781067708 0% => Maybe some paragraphs are off the topic.
Paragraph topic coherence SD: 0.0 0.0609392437508 0% => Paragraphs are similar to each other. Some content may get duplicated or it is not exactly right on the topic.
Essay readability:
automated_readability_index: 20.6 12.6369458128 163% => OK
flesch_reading_ease: 24.11 53.1260098522 45% => Flesch_reading_ease is low.
smog_index: 14.6 6.54236453202 223% => Smog_index is high.
flesch_kincaid_grade: 17.4 10.9458128079 159% => OK
coleman_liau_index: 16.14 11.5310837438 140% => OK
dale_chall_readability_score: 10.76 8.32886699507 129% => OK
difficult_words: 55.0 55.0591133005 100% => OK
linsear_write_formula: 17.0 9.94827586207 171% => OK
gunning_fog: 14.0 10.3980295567 135% => OK
text_standard: 17.0 10.5123152709 162% => OK
What are above readability scores?
---------------------
More content wanted.
Minimum 200 words wanted.
Minimum four paragraphs wanted.
It is not exactly right on the topic in the view of e-grader. Maybe there is a wrong essay topic.
Rates: 11.1111111111 out of 100
Scores by essay e-grader: 10.0 Out of 90
---------------------
Note: the e-grader does NOT examine the meaning of words and ideas. VIP users will receive further evaluations by advanced module of e-grader and human graders.