Team sports are generally promoted as a great way to keep fit and build character. However, sporting events such as soccer matches are often accompanied by violence between rival supporters and other forms of antisocial behaviour. If sporting events cause antisocial behaviour, can team sports really be good for us?
Team sports build great character and make an individual to keep their body fit. In the past two-three decades, people oppose team sports says these matches ends with violence and creates rivalry between supporters. In this essay, I will discuss the importance of team sports and the disadvantages with possible solution.
It is always necessary to create awareness to the younger generation in abiding to the rules and regulation of the sports played. This will lead to control their emotion during failures and help them not to engage in any kind of violence. By having some strict rules and by educating the player on their responsibility on field will make sure they are not setting bad example to the future generation.
However, with such small incidents, taking a big U-turn on not promoting the team sports is not accepted. As everyone knows how important team building activities for an individual. Say for an example, in recently concluded Soccer World-cup, a match involving Japan, fans cleaned the entire stadium even when their team lost. It's important to show such incidents to younger generation not showing the negativity it involves. Such incident will always cut antisocial behavior.
To conclude, I agree that some times team sports ends in violence. I rather wants people to look into the positive side of the team sports and take the best it gives to the team and to an individual like character, fitness and stardom and by implementing rules and regulation the violence could be reduced.
Grammar and spelling errors:
Line 7, column 77, Rule ID: NON3PRS_VERB[1]
Message: The pronoun 'I' must be used with a non-third-person form of a verb: 'want'
Suggestion: want
... team sports ends in violence. I rather wants people to look into the positive side o...
^^^^^
Transition Words or Phrases used:
however, look, so, kind of
Attributes: Values AverageValues Percentages(Values/AverageValues)% => Comments
Performance on Part of Speech:
To be verbs : 4.0 10.5418719212 38% => More to be verbs wanted.
Auxiliary verbs: 5.0 6.10837438424 82% => OK
Conjunction : 11.0 8.36945812808 131% => OK
Relative clauses : 2.0 5.94088669951 34% => More relative clauses wanted.
Pronoun: 18.0 20.9802955665 86% => OK
Preposition: 39.0 31.9359605911 122% => OK
Nominalization: 11.0 5.75862068966 191% => OK
Performance on vocabulary words:
No of characters: 1274.0 1207.87684729 105% => OK
No of words: 255.0 242.827586207 105% => OK
Chars per words: 4.99607843137 5.00649968141 100% => OK
Fourth root words length: 3.99608801488 3.92707691288 102% => OK
Word Length SD: 2.59587701369 2.71678728327 96% => OK
Unique words: 151.0 139.433497537 108% => OK
Unique words percentage: 0.592156862745 0.580463131201 102% => OK
syllable_count: 387.9 379.143842365 102% => OK
avg_syllables_per_word: 1.5 1.57093596059 95% => OK
A sentence (or a clause, phrase) starts by:
Pronoun: 6.0 4.6157635468 130% => OK
Article: 1.0 1.56157635468 64% => OK
Subordination: 1.0 1.71428571429 58% => OK
Conjunction: 0.0 0.931034482759 0% => OK
Preposition: 6.0 3.65517241379 164% => OK
Performance on sentences:
How many sentences: 13.0 12.6551724138 103% => OK
Sentence length: 19.0 20.5024630542 93% => OK
Sentence length SD: 47.0750376696 50.4703680194 93% => OK
Chars per sentence: 98.0 104.977214359 93% => OK
Words per sentence: 19.6153846154 20.9669160288 94% => OK
Discourse Markers: 2.0 7.25397266985 28% => More transition words/phrases wanted.
Paragraphs: 4.0 4.12807881773 97% => OK
Language errors: 1.0 5.33497536946 19% => OK
Sentences with positive sentiment : 7.0 6.9802955665 100% => OK
Sentences with negative sentiment : 6.0 2.75862068966 217% => Less negative sentences wanted.
Sentences with neutral sentiment: 0.0 2.91625615764 0% => More facts, knowledge or examples wanted.
What are sentences with positive/Negative/neutral sentiment?
Coherence and Cohesion:
Essay topic to essay body coherence: 0.274904807425 0.242375264174 113% => OK
Sentence topic coherence: 0.0983871836546 0.0925447433944 106% => OK
Sentence topic coherence SD: 0.0739560817105 0.071462118173 103% => OK
Paragraph topic coherence: 0.163568174828 0.151781067708 108% => OK
Paragraph topic coherence SD: 0.0794381293921 0.0609392437508 130% => OK
Essay readability:
automated_readability_index: 11.9 12.6369458128 94% => Automated_readability_index is low.
flesch_reading_ease: 60.65 53.1260098522 114% => OK
smog_index: 8.8 6.54236453202 135% => OK
flesch_kincaid_grade: 9.5 10.9458128079 87% => OK
coleman_liau_index: 11.72 11.5310837438 102% => OK
dale_chall_readability_score: 8.42 8.32886699507 101% => OK
difficult_words: 62.0 55.0591133005 113% => OK
linsear_write_formula: 11.0 9.94827586207 111% => OK
gunning_fog: 9.6 10.3980295567 92% => OK
text_standard: 12.0 10.5123152709 114% => OK
What are above readability scores?
---------------------
Rates: 85.0 out of 100
Scores by essay e-grader: 76.5 Out of 90
---------------------
Note: the e-grader does NOT examine the meaning of words and ideas. VIP users will receive further evaluations by advanced module of e-grader and human graders.