Team sports are generally promoted as a great way to keep fit and build character. However, sporting events such as soccer matches are often accompanied by violence between rival supporters and other forms of antisocial behaviour. If sporting events cause antisocial behaviour, can team sports really be good for us?
Sports are essential for our daily life to make strength our bodies and mind. Soccer is the main game played all our the world by groups. But sometimes, these group games ends with violence and riots. I am totally agree that team sports are best for human beings. The very less members are creating problems during the sports, not the majority. So everywhere, we have some sort of problem in all concerns.
Firstly, the group games are very cooperative in the international levels. The soccer is a very popular game in the western side and almost 90% of people in US are playing this game. They have better understanding and proper management in the team. So it would not affects the audience to grab the nonsense things.
Secondly, it is paramount game and better fit making capacity in the team. They can communicate each other and brotherhood relation between the members. So it could be a significant purpose to deal with the peer to peer person.
Lastly, it might helps the sharing the idea of intelluctual manners and mind read talents among the leaders.
In conclusion, taking these points into consideration, from a personal perspective, without a shadow of a doubt, I finalize that team sports never be bad in the environment and it should be encouraged among the players.
Grammar and spelling errors:
Line 1, column 215, Rule ID: BEEN_PART_AGREEMENT[2]
Message: Consider using a past participle here: 'agreed'.
Suggestion: agreed
...s with violence and riots. I am totally agree that team sports are best for human bei...
^^^^^
Line 1, column 274, Rule ID: FEWER_LESS[2]
Message: Did you mean 'fewer'? The noun members is countable.
Suggestion: fewer
...rts are best for human beings. The very less members are creating problems during th...
^^^^
Line 2, column 265, Rule ID: DID_BASEFORM[1]
Message: The verb 'would' requires the base form of the verb: 'affect'
Suggestion: affect
...management in the team. So it would not affects the audience to grab the nonsense thing...
^^^^^^^
Transition Words or Phrases used:
but, first, firstly, if, lastly, second, secondly, so, in conclusion, sort of
Attributes: Values AverageValues Percentages(Values/AverageValues)% => Comments
Performance on Part of Speech:
To be verbs : 11.0 10.5418719212 104% => OK
Auxiliary verbs: 5.0 6.10837438424 82% => OK
Conjunction : 9.0 8.36945812808 108% => OK
Relative clauses : 2.0 5.94088669951 34% => More relative clauses wanted.
Pronoun: 19.0 20.9802955665 91% => OK
Preposition: 26.0 31.9359605911 81% => OK
Nominalization: 6.0 5.75862068966 104% => OK
Performance on vocabulary words:
No of characters: 1072.0 1207.87684729 89% => OK
No of words: 220.0 242.827586207 91% => More content wanted.
Chars per words: 4.87272727273 5.00649968141 97% => OK
Fourth root words length: 3.85128510684 3.92707691288 98% => OK
Word Length SD: 2.67478275939 2.71678728327 98% => OK
Unique words: 138.0 139.433497537 99% => OK
Unique words percentage: 0.627272727273 0.580463131201 108% => OK
syllable_count: 323.1 379.143842365 85% => OK
avg_syllables_per_word: 1.5 1.57093596059 95% => OK
A sentence (or a clause, phrase) starts by:
Pronoun: 8.0 4.6157635468 173% => OK
Interrogative: 0.0 0.325123152709 0% => OK
Article: 3.0 1.56157635468 192% => OK
Subordination: 0.0 1.71428571429 0% => More adverbial clause wanted.
Conjunction: 1.0 0.931034482759 107% => OK
Preposition: 3.0 3.65517241379 82% => OK
Performance on sentences:
How many sentences: 15.0 12.6551724138 119% => OK
Sentence length: 14.0 20.5024630542 68% => The Avg. Sentence Length is relatively short.
Sentence length SD: 38.8453343402 50.4703680194 77% => OK
Chars per sentence: 71.4666666667 104.977214359 68% => OK
Words per sentence: 14.6666666667 20.9669160288 70% => OK
Discourse Markers: 5.13333333333 7.25397266985 71% => OK
Paragraphs: 5.0 4.12807881773 121% => OK
Language errors: 3.0 5.33497536946 56% => OK
Sentences with positive sentiment : 9.0 6.9802955665 129% => OK
Sentences with negative sentiment : 4.0 2.75862068966 145% => OK
Sentences with neutral sentiment: 2.0 2.91625615764 69% => OK
What are sentences with positive/Negative/neutral sentiment?
Coherence and Cohesion:
Essay topic to essay body coherence: 0.114681670124 0.242375264174 47% => OK
Sentence topic coherence: 0.0341626574128 0.0925447433944 37% => Sentence topic similarity is low.
Sentence topic coherence SD: 0.0367685634446 0.071462118173 51% => OK
Paragraph topic coherence: 0.0529252001316 0.151781067708 35% => Maybe some paragraphs are off the topic.
Paragraph topic coherence SD: 0.0355696498396 0.0609392437508 58% => OK
Essay readability:
automated_readability_index: 8.8 12.6369458128 70% => Automated_readability_index is low.
flesch_reading_ease: 65.73 53.1260098522 124% => OK
smog_index: 3.1 6.54236453202 47% => Smog_index is low.
flesch_kincaid_grade: 7.6 10.9458128079 69% => OK
coleman_liau_index: 10.37 11.5310837438 90% => OK
dale_chall_readability_score: 7.78 8.32886699507 93% => OK
difficult_words: 48.0 55.0591133005 87% => OK
linsear_write_formula: 6.0 9.94827586207 60% => OK
gunning_fog: 7.6 10.3980295567 73% => OK
text_standard: 8.0 10.5123152709 76% => OK
What are above readability scores?
---------------------
Rates: 55.5555555556 out of 100
Scores by essay e-grader: 50.0 Out of 90
---------------------
Note: the e-grader does NOT examine the meaning of words and ideas. VIP users will receive further evaluations by advanced module of e-grader and human graders.