Technology allows us to have a useful and interesting life than in the past. Do you agree or disagree?
Nowadays, it is increasingly acknowledged that technologies are playing more and more important role in our life. While some people believe that technology allows people to have a useful and interesting life, others oppose that it is harmful to life. As far as I am concerned, using technology in life will be more beneficial in respect of this issue.
People who emphasize the importance of advantage of technology are primarily focusing on convenience it brings. They advocate that some technology products such as smart phones and tablets make people communicate without limits of time and location. Moreover, the public internet and free Wi-Fi are quite common in today's society. That is to say, people can not only update news and reports easily, but also get notification of events quickly.
It is evidently reasonable for me to believe that technologies are of benefit for our life. The main justification of this view is that mechanized equipment is commonly used in many factories, which would save manpower and reduce operating time. Therefore, companies can not only reduce costs, but also improve work efficiency. In addition, people no longer need to spend a lot of energy on their work. That is to say, they can have more time to be with their families and strengthen the family bond.
In a nutshell, although this controversial topic never fails to attract the public attention, we may safely reach the conclusion that technologies will be more advantageous for our life.
Transition Words or Phrases used:
also, but, if, may, moreover, so, then, therefore, while, in addition, such as, that is to say
Attributes: Values AverageValues Percentages(Values/AverageValues)% => Comments
Performance on Part of Speech:
To be verbs : 14.0 10.5418719212 133% => OK
Auxiliary verbs: 8.0 6.10837438424 131% => OK
Conjunction : 10.0 8.36945812808 119% => OK
Relative clauses : 11.0 5.94088669951 185% => OK
Pronoun: 26.0 20.9802955665 124% => Less pronouns wanted
Preposition: 27.0 31.9359605911 85% => OK
Nominalization: 8.0 5.75862068966 139% => OK
Performance on vocabulary words:
No of characters: 1254.0 1207.87684729 104% => OK
No of words: 244.0 242.827586207 100% => OK
Chars per words: 5.1393442623 5.00649968141 103% => OK
Fourth root words length: 3.95227774224 3.92707691288 101% => OK
Word Length SD: 2.86896955265 2.71678728327 106% => OK
Unique words: 146.0 139.433497537 105% => OK
Unique words percentage: 0.598360655738 0.580463131201 103% => OK
syllable_count: 410.4 379.143842365 108% => OK
avg_syllables_per_word: 1.7 1.57093596059 108% => OK
A sentence (or a clause, phrase) starts by:
Pronoun: 7.0 4.6157635468 152% => OK
Article: 2.0 1.56157635468 128% => OK
Subordination: 3.0 1.71428571429 175% => OK
Conjunction: 2.0 0.931034482759 215% => Less conjunction wanted as sentence beginning.
Preposition: 2.0 3.65517241379 55% => More preposition wanted as sentence beginning.
Performance on sentences:
How many sentences: 13.0 12.6551724138 103% => OK
Sentence length: 18.0 20.5024630542 88% => OK
Sentence length SD: 31.1098454706 50.4703680194 62% => OK
Chars per sentence: 96.4615384615 104.977214359 92% => OK
Words per sentence: 18.7692307692 20.9669160288 90% => OK
Discourse Markers: 7.23076923077 7.25397266985 100% => OK
Paragraphs: 4.0 4.12807881773 97% => OK
Language errors: 0.0 5.33497536946 0% => OK
Sentences with positive sentiment : 12.0 6.9802955665 172% => OK
Sentences with negative sentiment : 1.0 2.75862068966 36% => More negative sentences wanted.
Sentences with neutral sentiment: 0.0 2.91625615764 0% => More facts, knowledge or examples wanted.
What are sentences with positive/Negative/neutral sentiment?
Coherence and Cohesion:
Essay topic to essay body coherence: 0.179316781707 0.242375264174 74% => OK
Sentence topic coherence: 0.0627079837514 0.0925447433944 68% => OK
Sentence topic coherence SD: 0.0769993203114 0.071462118173 108% => OK
Paragraph topic coherence: 0.110174104119 0.151781067708 73% => OK
Paragraph topic coherence SD: 0.0919074542957 0.0609392437508 151% => OK
Essay readability:
automated_readability_index: 12.2 12.6369458128 97% => OK
flesch_reading_ease: 44.75 53.1260098522 84% => OK
smog_index: 8.8 6.54236453202 135% => OK
flesch_kincaid_grade: 11.5 10.9458128079 105% => OK
coleman_liau_index: 12.53 11.5310837438 109% => OK
dale_chall_readability_score: 8.99 8.32886699507 108% => OK
difficult_words: 69.0 55.0591133005 125% => OK
linsear_write_formula: 9.0 9.94827586207 90% => OK
gunning_fog: 9.2 10.3980295567 88% => OK
text_standard: 9.0 10.5123152709 86% => OK
What are above readability scores?
---------------------
Rates: 72.2222222222 out of 100
Scores by essay e-grader: 65.0 Out of 90
---------------------
Note: the e-grader does NOT examine the meaning of words and ideas. VIP users will receive further evaluations by advanced module of e-grader and human graders.