There are social medical and technical problems associated with the use of mobile phone do you agree that the problems out weigh the benefits of the mobile phone.
The importance of mobile phone which has always been debatable has now upsvTrged a lot of arguments in favor and against it thus it has become even more controversial the substantial influence has sparked the controversy over the potential of this trend in an integral part of the society community educational individual in recent years .it can be agreed that upside of is instrumental indeed however it has some various drawbacks as well this easy will be elaborate both assertion and will be provide to a well weighted conclusion .
At the outset there are numerous reasons why children as mobile phone front pocket is unreservedly salient but the more conspicuous one lies in the fact that vibrate is attack .it is clearly vital time for people appreciate the significance of mobile phone for the overall amelioration of society .
However there are some people who close to think differently and hold an apposing viewpoint which can certainly over whelm the potential influence firstly mobile help lots of think such as study nevertheless the contradiction is rooted in the fact that example mobile phone hence it is apparent that downside of mobile cannot be over looked
The above presented dissertation illustrates both perspectives about the impact of mobile phone while it is evident that is has various benefit although its deleterious effects cannot be ignored and have to be addressed and well balanced against its merits.?
Grammar and spelling errors:
Line 1, column 338, Rule ID: COMMA_PARENTHESIS_WHITESPACE
Message: Don't put a space before the full stop
Suggestion: .
...y educational individual in recent years .it can be agreed that upside of is instr...
^^
Line 1, column 533, Rule ID: COMMA_PARENTHESIS_WHITESPACE
Message: Don't put a space before the full stop
Suggestion: .
...be provide to a well weighted conclusion . At the outset there are numerous reaso...
^^
Line 2, column 176, Rule ID: COMMA_PARENTHESIS_WHITESPACE
Message: Don't put a space before the full stop
Suggestion: .
... lies in the fact that vibrate is attack .it is clearly vital time for people appr...
^^
Line 2, column 297, Rule ID: COMMA_PARENTHESIS_WHITESPACE
Message: Don't put a space before the full stop
Suggestion: .
... for the overall amelioration of society . However there are some people who clos...
^^
Line 3, column 1, Rule ID: SENT_START_CONJUNCTIVE_LINKING_ADVERB_COMMA[1]
Message: Did you forget a comma after a conjunctive/linking adverb?
Suggestion: However,
... the overall amelioration of society . However there are some people who close to thin...
^^^^^^^
Line 3, column 330, Rule ID: OVER_LOOKED[1]
Message: Did you mean 'overlooked'?
Suggestion: overlooked
...arent that downside of mobile cannot be over looked The above presented dissertation illu...
^^^^^^^^^^^
Line 3, column 341, Rule ID: WHITESPACE_RULE
Message: Possible typo: you repeated a whitespace
Suggestion:
...downside of mobile cannot be over looked The above presented dissertation illustr...
^^^
Line 4, column 260, Rule ID: WHITESPACE_RULE
Message: Possible typo: you repeated a whitespace
Suggestion:
... and well balanced against its merits.?
^^^^^
Transition Words or Phrases used:
but, first, firstly, hence, however, if, look, nevertheless, so, thus, well, while, such as
Attributes: Values AverageValues Percentages(Values/AverageValues)% => Comments
Performance on Part of Speech:
To be verbs : 17.0 10.5418719212 161% => OK
Auxiliary verbs: 6.0 6.10837438424 98% => OK
Conjunction : 6.0 8.36945812808 72% => OK
Relative clauses : 8.0 5.94088669951 135% => OK
Pronoun: 16.0 20.9802955665 76% => OK
Preposition: 26.0 31.9359605911 81% => OK
Nominalization: 8.0 5.75862068966 139% => OK
Performance on vocabulary words:
No of characters: 1206.0 1207.87684729 100% => OK
No of words: 234.0 242.827586207 96% => OK
Chars per words: 5.15384615385 5.00649968141 103% => OK
Fourth root words length: 3.91114542567 3.92707691288 100% => OK
Word Length SD: 2.84681439466 2.71678728327 105% => OK
Unique words: 137.0 139.433497537 98% => OK
Unique words percentage: 0.58547008547 0.580463131201 101% => OK
syllable_count: 392.4 379.143842365 103% => OK
avg_syllables_per_word: 1.7 1.57093596059 108% => OK
A sentence (or a clause, phrase) starts by:
Pronoun: 2.0 4.6157635468 43% => OK
Article: 2.0 1.56157635468 128% => OK
Subordination: 0.0 1.71428571429 0% => More adverbial clause wanted.
Conjunction: 0.0 0.931034482759 0% => OK
Preposition: 1.0 3.65517241379 27% => More preposition wanted as sentence beginning.
Performance on sentences:
How many sentences: 3.0 12.6551724138 24% => Need more sentences. Double check the format of sentences, make sure there is a space between two sentences, or have enough periods. And also check the lengths of sentences, maybe they are too long.
Sentence length: 78.0 20.5024630542 380% => The Avg. Sentence Length is relatively long.
Sentence length SD: 129.95469296 50.4703680194 257% => The lengths of sentences changed so frequently.
Chars per sentence: 402.0 104.977214359 383% => Less chars_per_sentence wanted.
Words per sentence: 78.0 20.9669160288 372% => Less words per sentence wanted.
Discourse Markers: 30.3333333333 7.25397266985 418% => Less transition words/phrases wanted.
Paragraphs: 4.0 4.12807881773 97% => OK
Language errors: 8.0 5.33497536946 150% => OK
Sentences with positive sentiment : 3.0 6.9802955665 43% => More positive sentences wanted.
Sentences with negative sentiment : 0.0 2.75862068966 0% => More negative sentences wanted.
Sentences with neutral sentiment: 0.0 2.91625615764 0% => More facts, knowledge or examples wanted.
What are sentences with positive/Negative/neutral sentiment?
Coherence and Cohesion:
Essay topic to essay body coherence: 0.179371860777 0.242375264174 74% => OK
Sentence topic coherence: 0.126626486791 0.0925447433944 137% => OK
Sentence topic coherence SD: 0.0421110159168 0.071462118173 59% => OK
Paragraph topic coherence: 0.114169724947 0.151781067708 75% => OK
Paragraph topic coherence SD: 0.0326623578616 0.0609392437508 54% => OK
Essay readability:
automated_readability_index: 41.8 12.6369458128 331% => Automated_readability_index is high.
flesch_reading_ease: -16.15 53.1260098522 -30% => Flesch_reading_ease is low.
smog_index: 17.1 6.54236453202 261% => Smog_index is high.
flesch_kincaid_grade: 34.9 10.9458128079 319% => Flesch kincaid grade is high.
coleman_liau_index: 13.77 11.5310837438 119% => OK
dale_chall_readability_score: 11.89 8.32886699507 143% => OK
difficult_words: 65.0 55.0591133005 118% => OK
linsear_write_formula: 29.5 9.94827586207 297% => Linsear_write_formula is high.
gunning_fog: 33.2 10.3980295567 319% => Gunning_fog is high.
text_standard: 30.0 10.5123152709 285% => The average readability is very high. Good job!
What are above readability scores?
---------------------
Rates: 77.7777777778 out of 100
Scores by essay e-grader: 70.0 Out of 90
---------------------
Note: the e-grader does NOT examine the meaning of words and ideas. VIP users will receive further evaluations by advanced module of e-grader and human graders.