There are social, medical and technical problems associated with the use of mobile phones. Do you agree that the problems outweigh the benefits of mobile phones?
The importance of mobile phones which has always debatable has now become more controversial with many people claiming that it is beneficial while others reject this notion. The substantial influence of this trend has sparked the controversy over the potential impact in recent years. In my opinion, the former proposition appears to be more rational. This essay will further elaborate both positive and negative effects of this trend and thus will lead to a logical conclusion.
There are myriad of reasons which will further explain this argument but the most preponderant one stems from the fact that there are many benefits of mobile phones. We can use many facilities on mobile phones. We can find anything and everything on our mobile phones with the help of mobile phones. Mobile phones help us for any research and any medical techniques. Another pivotal aspect of this argument is that mobile phones helped people to many things and create many new adventures. Needles to say, all these merits stand in a good stead.
However, there are some pitfalls that negate these arguments and which can certainly overwhelm the potential influence of this trend but one of the most alarming one is that there are some people used mobile phones they misuse of their phone. They made some wrong thing for social skills and many other things. Hence, it is apparent why many are against this trend.
According to the arguments aforementioned above, one can reach to a conclusion that the benefits of mobile phones are instrumental indeed. Nevertheless, its potential drawbacks should not be overlooked either.
Transition Words or Phrases used:
but, hence, however, look, nevertheless, so, thus, while, in my opinion
Attributes: Values AverageValues Percentages(Values/AverageValues)% => Comments
Performance on Part of Speech:
To be verbs : 12.0 10.5418719212 114% => OK
Auxiliary verbs: 8.0 6.10837438424 131% => OK
Conjunction : 9.0 8.36945812808 108% => OK
Relative clauses : 9.0 5.94088669951 151% => OK
Pronoun: 27.0 20.9802955665 129% => Less pronouns wanted
Preposition: 28.0 31.9359605911 88% => OK
Nominalization: 6.0 5.75862068966 104% => OK
Performance on vocabulary words:
No of characters: 1346.0 1207.87684729 111% => OK
No of words: 263.0 242.827586207 108% => OK
Chars per words: 5.11787072243 5.00649968141 102% => OK
Fourth root words length: 4.02706775958 3.92707691288 103% => OK
Word Length SD: 2.57583726516 2.71678728327 95% => OK
Unique words: 145.0 139.433497537 104% => OK
Unique words percentage: 0.551330798479 0.580463131201 95% => More unique words wanted or less content wanted.
syllable_count: 430.2 379.143842365 113% => OK
avg_syllables_per_word: 1.6 1.57093596059 102% => OK
A sentence (or a clause, phrase) starts by:
Pronoun: 6.0 4.6157635468 130% => OK
Article: 3.0 1.56157635468 192% => OK
Subordination: 0.0 1.71428571429 0% => More adverbial clause wanted.
Conjunction: 0.0 0.931034482759 0% => OK
Preposition: 2.0 3.65517241379 55% => More preposition wanted as sentence beginning.
Performance on sentences:
How many sentences: 15.0 12.6551724138 119% => OK
Sentence length: 17.0 20.5024630542 83% => The Avg. Sentence Length is relatively short.
Sentence length SD: 53.9449925593 50.4703680194 107% => OK
Chars per sentence: 89.7333333333 104.977214359 85% => OK
Words per sentence: 17.5333333333 20.9669160288 84% => OK
Discourse Markers: 4.73333333333 7.25397266985 65% => OK
Paragraphs: 4.0 4.12807881773 97% => OK
Language errors: 0.0 5.33497536946 0% => OK
Sentences with positive sentiment : 8.0 6.9802955665 115% => OK
Sentences with negative sentiment : 3.0 2.75862068966 109% => OK
Sentences with neutral sentiment: 4.0 2.91625615764 137% => OK
What are sentences with positive/Negative/neutral sentiment?
Coherence and Cohesion:
Essay topic to essay body coherence: 0.21738472572 0.242375264174 90% => OK
Sentence topic coherence: 0.0807015154776 0.0925447433944 87% => OK
Sentence topic coherence SD: 0.0814723131039 0.071462118173 114% => OK
Paragraph topic coherence: 0.130210638066 0.151781067708 86% => OK
Paragraph topic coherence SD: 0.0792104182445 0.0609392437508 130% => OK
Essay readability:
automated_readability_index: 11.5 12.6369458128 91% => Automated_readability_index is low.
flesch_reading_ease: 54.22 53.1260098522 102% => OK
smog_index: 3.1 6.54236453202 47% => Smog_index is low.
flesch_kincaid_grade: 9.9 10.9458128079 90% => OK
coleman_liau_index: 12.12 11.5310837438 105% => OK
dale_chall_readability_score: 8.44 8.32886699507 101% => OK
difficult_words: 66.0 55.0591133005 120% => OK
linsear_write_formula: 11.5 9.94827586207 116% => OK
gunning_fog: 8.8 10.3980295567 85% => OK
text_standard: 12.0 10.5123152709 114% => OK
What are above readability scores?
---------------------
Rates: 75.0 out of 100
Scores by essay e-grader: 67.5 Out of 90
---------------------
Note: the e-grader does NOT examine the meaning of words and ideas. VIP users will receive further evaluations by advanced module of e-grader and human graders.