Tobacco, mainly in the form of cigarettes is one of the most widely used drugs in the world. Over a billion adults legally smoke tobacco every day. The long-term health costs are high- for the smokers themselves, and for the wider community in terms of health care costs and lost productivity.Do Governments have a legitimate role to protect citizens from the harmful effects of their own decisions to smoke, or are such decisions up to an individual?”
Nowadays, tobacco mostly in the form of cigarettes and it is the one widely used drug in the world. And, it is harmful for individuals. But, to smoke cigarettes is legal almost in all the countries and many adults smoke this every day. I think that governments take action to protect citizens from this. But it is also the responsibility of people to not take those things which harmful for their body. I well shed light on both views in upcoming paragraphs before suitable conclusion.
To initiate with, tobacco is the very harmful for everyone. So, it is the responsibility of the government should ban on these things which harmful for everyone. Furthermore, when anyone addicted to smoke the cigarettes then they don’t leave whole life. When one person can smoke the cigarette those who are nearby them at that time and they also effect. And, tobacco causes many diseases like lung cancer and heart diseases.
Nevertheless, it is also a responsibility of the individuals which things is bad for their body or which is not. For adults, smoking is very harmful because they have many affect and their body cannot work properly. So, avoid these things which harm our body.
To recapitulate, it is responsibility of the government as well as it is the responsibility of the individual’s also. I opine that government should ban smoking on public areas like near schools, colleges or bus stop.
Grammar and spelling errors:
Line 5, column 168, Rule ID: MANY_NN[1]
Message: Possible agreement error. The noun affect seems to be countable; consider using: 'many affects'.
Suggestion: many affects
...oking is very harmful because they have many affect and their body cannot work properly. So...
^^^^^^^^^^^
Line 7, column 118, Rule ID: ALSO_SENT_END[1]
Message: 'Also' is not used at the end of the sentence. Use 'as well' instead.
Suggestion: as well
...responsibility of the individual's also. I opine that government should ban smo...
^^^^
Transition Words or Phrases used:
also, but, furthermore, if, nevertheless, so, then, well, i think, as well as
Attributes: Values AverageValues Percentages(Values/AverageValues)% => Comments
Performance on Part of Speech:
To be verbs : 13.0 10.5418719212 123% => OK
Auxiliary verbs: 4.0 6.10837438424 65% => OK
Conjunction : 8.0 8.36945812808 96% => OK
Relative clauses : 11.0 5.94088669951 185% => OK
Pronoun: 27.0 20.9802955665 129% => Less pronouns wanted
Preposition: 26.0 31.9359605911 81% => OK
Nominalization: 3.0 5.75862068966 52% => More nominalizations (nouns with a suffix like: tion ment ence ance) wanted.
Performance on vocabulary words:
No of characters: 1177.0 1207.87684729 97% => OK
No of words: 237.0 242.827586207 98% => OK
Chars per words: 4.96624472574 5.00649968141 99% => OK
Fourth root words length: 3.92362132708 3.92707691288 100% => OK
Word Length SD: 2.90348096475 2.71678728327 107% => OK
Unique words: 129.0 139.433497537 93% => More unique words wanted.
Unique words percentage: 0.544303797468 0.580463131201 94% => More unique words wanted or less content wanted.
syllable_count: 373.5 379.143842365 99% => OK
avg_syllables_per_word: 1.6 1.57093596059 102% => OK
A sentence (or a clause, phrase) starts by:
Pronoun: 7.0 4.6157635468 152% => OK
Article: 0.0 1.56157635468 0% => OK
Subordination: 2.0 1.71428571429 117% => OK
Conjunction: 1.0 0.931034482759 107% => OK
Preposition: 3.0 3.65517241379 82% => OK
Performance on sentences:
How many sentences: 16.0 12.6551724138 126% => OK
Sentence length: 14.0 20.5024630542 68% => The Avg. Sentence Length is relatively short.
Sentence length SD: 23.9895810718 50.4703680194 48% => The essay contains lots of sentences with the similar length. More sentence varieties wanted.
Chars per sentence: 73.5625 104.977214359 70% => OK
Words per sentence: 14.8125 20.9669160288 71% => OK
Discourse Markers: 4.8125 7.25397266985 66% => OK
Paragraphs: 4.0 4.12807881773 97% => OK
Language errors: 2.0 5.33497536946 37% => OK
Sentences with positive sentiment : 4.0 6.9802955665 57% => More positive sentences wanted.
Sentences with negative sentiment : 6.0 2.75862068966 217% => Less negative sentences wanted.
Sentences with neutral sentiment: 6.0 2.91625615764 206% => Less facts, knowledge or examples wanted.
What are sentences with positive/Negative/neutral sentiment?
Coherence and Cohesion:
Essay topic to essay body coherence: 0.209388167466 0.242375264174 86% => OK
Sentence topic coherence: 0.0765975272979 0.0925447433944 83% => OK
Sentence topic coherence SD: 0.0941445529215 0.071462118173 132% => OK
Paragraph topic coherence: 0.125136787401 0.151781067708 82% => OK
Paragraph topic coherence SD: 0.0982664140331 0.0609392437508 161% => OK
Essay readability:
automated_readability_index: 9.4 12.6369458128 74% => Automated_readability_index is low.
flesch_reading_ease: 57.27 53.1260098522 108% => OK
smog_index: 3.1 6.54236453202 47% => Smog_index is low.
flesch_kincaid_grade: 8.8 10.9458128079 80% => OK
coleman_liau_index: 10.95 11.5310837438 95% => OK
dale_chall_readability_score: 7.0 8.32886699507 84% => OK
difficult_words: 40.0 55.0591133005 73% => More difficult words wanted.
linsear_write_formula: 6.0 9.94827586207 60% => OK
gunning_fog: 7.6 10.3980295567 73% => OK
text_standard: 9.0 10.5123152709 86% => OK
What are above readability scores?
---------------------
Rates: 55.5555555556 out of 100
Scores by essay e-grader: 50.0 Out of 90
---------------------
Note: the e-grader does NOT examine the meaning of words and ideas. VIP users will receive further evaluations by advanced module of e-grader and human graders.