Is tourism in less developed countries advantageous? Discuss your views and give the opinion.
The aspects of tourism industry in developing countries have become controversial issues among the public all around the world. Although they are regarded by a considerable number of inhabitants as thoroughly both constructive and positive, others hold opponents view. I am inclined to profoundly believe that this industry is beneficial in these areas as it could develop brilliant features for its adherents.
There are several reasons why expanding tourism industry in developing countries is advantageous. First and foremost, it has a plethora of financial effects for setllers. Namely, there is a great deal amount of money is annaully entered into these nations and citizens' income will be enhanced by this way. Furthermore, it is crystal clear that if a country wants to develop its tourism industry, it will provide its facilities including building appropriate roads, parks, restaurants, musuems, airports and some other things like these. Hence, not only does this industry create plenty of job opportunities but also it leads to thriving.
On the one hand, there is no doubt this industry has some demerits as well. Firstly, due to diversing cultures some confrontations might be occurred between the tourists and dwellers. People have some stronge triditional customs specifically in developing countries. Secondly, the tourists' culture and behaviour might have some negative attitudes for the youngstres' minds and the youths do some activities which are unsuitable among their families and societies.
In conclusion, while this industry in developing countries might have some catastrophic effects, I strongly believe that its merits outweigh the drawbacks.
Grammar and spelling errors:
Line 5, column 282, Rule ID: POSSESIVE_APOSTROPHE[1]
Message: Possible typo: apostrophe is missing. Did you mean 'tourists'' or 'tourist's'?
Suggestion: tourists'; tourist's
... in developing countries. Secondly, the tourists culture and behaviour might have some n...
^^^^^^^^
Transition Words or Phrases used:
also, but, first, firstly, furthermore, hence, if, second, secondly, so, well, while, in conclusion, no doubt
Attributes: Values AverageValues Percentages(Values/AverageValues)% => Comments
Performance on Part of Speech:
To be verbs : 11.0 10.5418719212 104% => OK
Auxiliary verbs: 6.0 6.10837438424 98% => OK
Conjunction : 9.0 8.36945812808 108% => OK
Relative clauses : 4.0 5.94088669951 67% => More relative clauses wanted.
Pronoun: 24.0 20.9802955665 114% => OK
Preposition: 24.0 31.9359605911 75% => OK
Nominalization: 0.0 5.75862068966 0% => More nominalizations (nouns with a suffix like: tion ment ence ance) wanted.
Performance on vocabulary words:
No of characters: 1429.0 1207.87684729 118% => OK
No of words: 253.0 242.827586207 104% => OK
Chars per words: 5.64822134387 5.00649968141 113% => OK
Fourth root words length: 3.98822939669 3.92707691288 102% => OK
Word Length SD: 2.98419234091 2.71678728327 110% => OK
Unique words: 164.0 139.433497537 118% => OK
Unique words percentage: 0.648221343874 0.580463131201 112% => OK
syllable_count: 436.5 379.143842365 115% => OK
avg_syllables_per_word: 1.7 1.57093596059 108% => OK
A sentence (or a clause, phrase) starts by:
Pronoun: 5.0 4.6157635468 108% => OK
Article: 2.0 1.56157635468 128% => OK
Subordination: 2.0 1.71428571429 117% => OK
Conjunction: 0.0 0.931034482759 0% => OK
Preposition: 2.0 3.65517241379 55% => More preposition wanted as sentence beginning.
Performance on sentences:
How many sentences: 13.0 12.6551724138 103% => OK
Sentence length: 19.0 20.5024630542 93% => OK
Sentence length SD: 44.9039738097 50.4703680194 89% => OK
Chars per sentence: 109.923076923 104.977214359 105% => OK
Words per sentence: 19.4615384615 20.9669160288 93% => OK
Discourse Markers: 8.38461538462 7.25397266985 116% => OK
Paragraphs: 4.0 4.12807881773 97% => OK
Language errors: 1.0 5.33497536946 19% => OK
Sentences with positive sentiment : 8.0 6.9802955665 115% => OK
Sentences with negative sentiment : 3.0 2.75862068966 109% => OK
Sentences with neutral sentiment: 2.0 2.91625615764 69% => OK
What are sentences with positive/Negative/neutral sentiment?
Coherence and Cohesion:
Essay topic to essay body coherence: 0.133466757011 0.242375264174 55% => OK
Sentence topic coherence: 0.0511410158385 0.0925447433944 55% => OK
Sentence topic coherence SD: 0.0606742454479 0.071462118173 85% => OK
Paragraph topic coherence: 0.0880390051394 0.151781067708 58% => OK
Paragraph topic coherence SD: 0.0439361936031 0.0609392437508 72% => OK
Essay readability:
automated_readability_index: 14.9 12.6369458128 118% => OK
flesch_reading_ease: 43.73 53.1260098522 82% => OK
smog_index: 8.8 6.54236453202 135% => OK
flesch_kincaid_grade: 11.9 10.9458128079 109% => OK
coleman_liau_index: 15.49 11.5310837438 134% => OK
dale_chall_readability_score: 9.57 8.32886699507 115% => OK
difficult_words: 80.0 55.0591133005 145% => OK
linsear_write_formula: 8.5 9.94827586207 85% => OK
gunning_fog: 9.6 10.3980295567 92% => OK
text_standard: 10.0 10.5123152709 95% => OK
What are above readability scores?
---------------------
Rates: 85.0 out of 100
Scores by essay e-grader: 76.5 Out of 90
---------------------
Note: the e-grader does NOT examine the meaning of words and ideas. VIP users will receive further evaluations by advanced module of e-grader and human graders.