In town and cities, the large shopping mall should replace the small local shop.
Recently, the phenomenon of big shopping malls establishment and its corresponding impacts have sparked a heated debate. Although contested by many that the matter of local stores is highly beneficial, such an issue is regarded thoroughly both constructive and positive by a substantial number of individuals. I am inclined to believe that numerous trading centers can be plus, and I will analyze that throughout this essay.
From a social standpoint, large shopping centers can provide the society with some noticeable effects which rooted in the fact that the merits of town development, as well as modern communal centers, are inextricably bound up. According to my own experience, when I was a university student, I performed an academic experiment which discovered that the shopping mall accessibility can made it possible the down town improvement. Thus, the beneficial ramifications of both little town growth and much choices for shopping apparently can be seen.
Within the realm of science, tiny local shops might increase the consequence of low-price stuff. Moreover, fundamental aspects of superficial development would relate to this reality that the demerits of cheap goods pertain to expensive shopping. As an example, some scientific research undertaken by a prestigious university has asserted that the downside of the traditional city is correlated negatively with lack of choice. Hence, it is correct to presume the preconceived notion of great buildings.
To conclude, while there are compelling arguments on both sides, I profoundly believe that the profits of the city facilities development like shopping malls far outweigh its drawbacks. Not only do the advantages of infrastructure development prove the significance of great buildings in city, but also pinpoint the long-term implications.
Grammar and spelling errors:
Line 3, column 496, Rule ID: MUCH_COUNTABLE[1]
Message: Use 'many' with countable nouns.
Suggestion: many
...ications of both little town growth and much choices for shopping apparently can be ...
^^^^
Line 7, column 116, Rule ID: POSSESIVE_APOSTROPHE[1]
Message: Possible typo: apostrophe is missing. Did you mean 'facilities'' or 'facility's'?
Suggestion: facilities'; facility's
...ly believe that the profits of the city facilities development like shopping malls far out...
^^^^^^^^^^
Transition Words or Phrases used:
also, apparently, but, hence, if, moreover, so, thus, well, while, as well as
Attributes: Values AverageValues Percentages(Values/AverageValues)% => Comments
Performance on Part of Speech:
To be verbs : 9.0 10.5418719212 85% => OK
Auxiliary verbs: 7.0 6.10837438424 115% => OK
Conjunction : 5.0 8.36945812808 60% => More conjunction wanted.
Relative clauses : 11.0 5.94088669951 185% => OK
Pronoun: 20.0 20.9802955665 95% => OK
Preposition: 35.0 31.9359605911 110% => OK
Nominalization: 11.0 5.75862068966 191% => OK
Performance on vocabulary words:
No of characters: 1553.0 1207.87684729 129% => OK
No of words: 276.0 242.827586207 114% => OK
Chars per words: 5.6268115942 5.00649968141 112% => OK
Fourth root words length: 4.07593519647 3.92707691288 104% => OK
Word Length SD: 3.21212153299 2.71678728327 118% => OK
Unique words: 183.0 139.433497537 131% => OK
Unique words percentage: 0.663043478261 0.580463131201 114% => OK
syllable_count: 479.7 379.143842365 127% => OK
avg_syllables_per_word: 1.7 1.57093596059 108% => OK
A sentence (or a clause, phrase) starts by:
Pronoun: 4.0 4.6157635468 87% => OK
Article: 2.0 1.56157635468 128% => OK
Subordination: 5.0 1.71428571429 292% => Less adverbial clause wanted.
Conjunction: 2.0 0.931034482759 215% => Less conjunction wanted as sentence beginning.
Preposition: 4.0 3.65517241379 109% => OK
Performance on sentences:
How many sentences: 12.0 12.6551724138 95% => OK
Sentence length: 23.0 20.5024630542 112% => OK
Sentence length SD: 44.5897191688 50.4703680194 88% => OK
Chars per sentence: 129.416666667 104.977214359 123% => OK
Words per sentence: 23.0 20.9669160288 110% => OK
Discourse Markers: 6.41666666667 7.25397266985 88% => OK
Paragraphs: 4.0 4.12807881773 97% => OK
Language errors: 2.0 5.33497536946 37% => OK
Sentences with positive sentiment : 8.0 6.9802955665 115% => OK
Sentences with negative sentiment : 1.0 2.75862068966 36% => More negative sentences wanted.
Sentences with neutral sentiment: 3.0 2.91625615764 103% => OK
What are sentences with positive/Negative/neutral sentiment?
Coherence and Cohesion:
Essay topic to essay body coherence: 0.231547969307 0.242375264174 96% => OK
Sentence topic coherence: 0.0711195462786 0.0925447433944 77% => OK
Sentence topic coherence SD: 0.0664103368012 0.071462118173 93% => OK
Paragraph topic coherence: 0.118733879968 0.151781067708 78% => OK
Paragraph topic coherence SD: 0.0602441427237 0.0609392437508 99% => OK
Essay readability:
automated_readability_index: 16.6 12.6369458128 131% => OK
flesch_reading_ease: 39.67 53.1260098522 75% => OK
smog_index: 11.2 6.54236453202 171% => OK
flesch_kincaid_grade: 13.4 10.9458128079 122% => OK
coleman_liau_index: 15.67 11.5310837438 136% => OK
dale_chall_readability_score: 10.5 8.32886699507 126% => OK
difficult_words: 100.0 55.0591133005 182% => OK
linsear_write_formula: 14.5 9.94827586207 146% => OK
gunning_fog: 11.2 10.3980295567 108% => OK
text_standard: 11.0 10.5123152709 105% => OK
What are above readability scores?
---------------------
Rates: 85.0 out of 100
Scores by essay e-grader: 76.5 Out of 90
---------------------
Note: the e-grader does NOT examine the meaning of words and ideas. VIP users will receive further evaluations by advanced module of e-grader and human graders.