In underdeveloped countries, tourism has disadvantages and can be said the opposite as well. What is your opinion?
The role of tour and travel in underdeveloped countries is widely debated with many people claiming that tourism has undoubtedly led to racial discrimination and lots of wastages which deteriorate the environment. However, I believe that tourism apparently provides the potentials for further development of the nations. This essay will further elaborate on both sides and thus, will lead to a logical conclusion.
To begin, there are various reason why tourism should be promoted significantly and the most conspicuous one stems from the fact that travel and tourism offer massive avenues to impoverished and underprivileged countries which fractionally or largely increase their gross domestic product. Furthermore, it provides a job market thereby increasing the employment locally. In addition, it transcends the political boundaries and improves the cross-cultural understanding in terms of ideologies, beliefs and customs among nations.
Nevertheless, there are some drawbacks which can certainly overwhelm the potential benefits of tourism in poor countries. The most alarming one is that international visitors are often subjected to racial discrimination, humiliation and even mocked upon. In this way, there is a change in their attitude towards the country visited and can adversely affect its development wholly. Moreover, promotion of tourism sometimes leads to astronomical wastage of resources which increases the pollution levels resulting into environmental degradation. Hence, it is apparent that tourism has some serious concerns.
In views of the arguments outlined above, the impact of tourism is prominent on poor nations although necessary steps should be initiated by the government to handle the downsides.
Transition Words or Phrases used:
apparently, furthermore, hence, however, if, moreover, nevertheless, so, thus, in addition
Attributes: Values AverageValues Percentages(Values/AverageValues)% => Comments
Performance on Part of Speech:
To be verbs : 10.0 10.5418719212 95% => OK
Auxiliary verbs: 6.0 6.10837438424 98% => OK
Conjunction : 11.0 8.36945812808 131% => OK
Relative clauses : 9.0 5.94088669951 151% => OK
Pronoun: 14.0 20.9802955665 67% => OK
Preposition: 32.0 31.9359605911 100% => OK
Nominalization: 12.0 5.75862068966 208% => Less nominalizations (nouns with a suffix like: tion ment ence ance) wanted.
Performance on vocabulary words:
No of characters: 1486.0 1207.87684729 123% => OK
No of words: 253.0 242.827586207 104% => OK
Chars per words: 5.87351778656 5.00649968141 117% => OK
Fourth root words length: 3.98822939669 3.92707691288 102% => OK
Word Length SD: 3.24069215511 2.71678728327 119% => OK
Unique words: 163.0 139.433497537 117% => OK
Unique words percentage: 0.644268774704 0.580463131201 111% => OK
syllable_count: 460.8 379.143842365 122% => OK
avg_syllables_per_word: 1.8 1.57093596059 115% => OK
A sentence (or a clause, phrase) starts by:
Pronoun: 5.0 4.6157635468 108% => OK
Article: 3.0 1.56157635468 192% => OK
Subordination: 0.0 1.71428571429 0% => More adverbial clause wanted.
Conjunction: 0.0 0.931034482759 0% => OK
Preposition: 4.0 3.65517241379 109% => OK
Performance on sentences:
How many sentences: 12.0 12.6551724138 95% => OK
Sentence length: 21.0 20.5024630542 102% => OK
Sentence length SD: 60.350998795 50.4703680194 120% => OK
Chars per sentence: 123.833333333 104.977214359 118% => OK
Words per sentence: 21.0833333333 20.9669160288 101% => OK
Discourse Markers: 7.5 7.25397266985 103% => OK
Paragraphs: 4.0 4.12807881773 97% => OK
Language errors: 0.0 5.33497536946 0% => OK
Sentences with positive sentiment : 3.0 6.9802955665 43% => More positive sentences wanted.
Sentences with negative sentiment : 5.0 2.75862068966 181% => OK
Sentences with neutral sentiment: 4.0 2.91625615764 137% => OK
What are sentences with positive/Negative/neutral sentiment?
Coherence and Cohesion:
Essay topic to essay body coherence: 0.141703440196 0.242375264174 58% => OK
Sentence topic coherence: 0.0466581747532 0.0925447433944 50% => OK
Sentence topic coherence SD: 0.0420117517295 0.071462118173 59% => OK
Paragraph topic coherence: 0.0795605351828 0.151781067708 52% => OK
Paragraph topic coherence SD: 0.0210147554485 0.0609392437508 34% => Paragraphs are similar to each other. Some content may get duplicated or it is not exactly right on the topic.
Essay readability:
automated_readability_index: 16.8 12.6369458128 133% => OK
flesch_reading_ease: 33.24 53.1260098522 63% => OK
smog_index: 11.2 6.54236453202 171% => OK
flesch_kincaid_grade: 13.8 10.9458128079 126% => OK
coleman_liau_index: 16.77 11.5310837438 145% => OK
dale_chall_readability_score: 10.73 8.32886699507 129% => OK
difficult_words: 97.0 55.0591133005 176% => OK
linsear_write_formula: 15.5 9.94827586207 156% => OK
gunning_fog: 10.4 10.3980295567 100% => OK
text_standard: 17.0 10.5123152709 162% => OK
What are above readability scores?
---------------------
Rates: 80.0 out of 100
Scores by essay e-grader: 72.0 Out of 90
---------------------
Note: the e-grader does NOT examine the meaning of words and ideas. VIP users will receive further evaluations by advanced module of e-grader and human graders.