Universities should penalize the students for the late submission of their work. Do you agree or disagree and represent your viewpoints in this regard.
It has long been a subject of discussion whether students should penalize for late submission of their work or not.In my opinion, the former notion has several strong elements that deserve attention and I will explain why using pertinent arguments.
My viewpoint has myriad of arguments. The most perceptible one, to start with, lies in the fact that majority of assertions based on unbiased figures obtain from local and global resources. Not only does it reveal some astonishing fact that prove the point of universities which are penalizing the students for late submission of assessments, but it also encourage one to consider more details further down the track. It gives the transparent and logical reasoning to the people of today's world about putting penalty on late submission of work will make students more responsible. For example, in Australia most universities and colleges penalize students for late submission of work by way of cutting 50% marks. Self-evidently, all these viewpoints stand penalty on late submission in good stead, as far as students success concerned.
Another vital argument is that based on some real-time facts and figures. People are taking crucial decisions after considering all associated merits and demerits. Besides a few shortcoming, it is all on the authorities to further educate people and allow them to take sensible decision. Therefore, it is quite evident that why many are in favor of my viewpoint.
From what has discussed above, one conclude that benefits of penalizing the students on late work submission indeed too great to ignore.
Grammar and spelling errors:
Line 1, column 116, Rule ID: SENTENCE_WHITESPACE
Message: Add a space between sentences
Suggestion: In
...or late submission of their work or not.In my opinion, the former notion has sever...
^^
Line 3, column 356, Rule ID: IT_VBZ[1]
Message: Did you mean 'encourages'?
Suggestion: encourages
... submission of assessments, but it also encourage one to consider more details further do...
^^^^^^^^^
Line 5, column 175, Rule ID: MANY_NN[1]
Message: Possible agreement error. The noun shortcoming seems to be countable; consider using: 'few shortcomings'.
Suggestion: few shortcomings
...sociated merits and demerits. Besides a few shortcoming, it is all on the authorities to furthe...
^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^
Transition Words or Phrases used:
also, besides, but, so, therefore, for example, in my opinion, to start with
Attributes: Values AverageValues Percentages(Values/AverageValues)% => Comments
Performance on Part of Speech:
To be verbs : 7.0 10.5418719212 66% => OK
Auxiliary verbs: 3.0 6.10837438424 49% => OK
Conjunction : 9.0 8.36945812808 108% => OK
Relative clauses : 7.0 5.94088669951 118% => OK
Pronoun: 19.0 20.9802955665 91% => OK
Preposition: 39.0 31.9359605911 122% => OK
Nominalization: 2.0 5.75862068966 35% => More nominalizations (nouns with a suffix like: tion ment ence ance) wanted.
Performance on vocabulary words:
No of characters: 1345.0 1207.87684729 111% => OK
No of words: 254.0 242.827586207 105% => OK
Chars per words: 5.29527559055 5.00649968141 106% => OK
Fourth root words length: 3.99216450694 3.92707691288 102% => OK
Word Length SD: 2.85774978497 2.71678728327 105% => OK
Unique words: 154.0 139.433497537 110% => OK
Unique words percentage: 0.606299212598 0.580463131201 104% => OK
syllable_count: 419.4 379.143842365 111% => OK
avg_syllables_per_word: 1.7 1.57093596059 108% => OK
A sentence (or a clause, phrase) starts by:
Pronoun: 5.0 4.6157635468 108% => OK
Article: 2.0 1.56157635468 128% => OK
Subordination: 1.0 1.71428571429 58% => OK
Conjunction: 1.0 0.931034482759 107% => OK
Preposition: 5.0 3.65517241379 137% => OK
Performance on sentences:
How many sentences: 12.0 12.6551724138 95% => OK
Sentence length: 21.0 20.5024630542 102% => OK
Sentence length SD: 58.9130126165 50.4703680194 117% => OK
Chars per sentence: 112.083333333 104.977214359 107% => OK
Words per sentence: 21.1666666667 20.9669160288 101% => OK
Discourse Markers: 6.33333333333 7.25397266985 87% => OK
Paragraphs: 4.0 4.12807881773 97% => OK
Language errors: 3.0 5.33497536946 56% => OK
Sentences with positive sentiment : 7.0 6.9802955665 100% => OK
Sentences with negative sentiment : 5.0 2.75862068966 181% => OK
Sentences with neutral sentiment: 0.0 2.91625615764 0% => More facts, knowledge or examples wanted.
What are sentences with positive/Negative/neutral sentiment?
Coherence and Cohesion:
Essay topic to essay body coherence: 0.306151086281 0.242375264174 126% => OK
Sentence topic coherence: 0.101857860673 0.0925447433944 110% => OK
Sentence topic coherence SD: 0.0943040492364 0.071462118173 132% => OK
Paragraph topic coherence: 0.172261883369 0.151781067708 113% => OK
Paragraph topic coherence SD: 0.0975246857917 0.0609392437508 160% => OK
Essay readability:
automated_readability_index: 14.1 12.6369458128 112% => OK
flesch_reading_ease: 41.7 53.1260098522 78% => OK
smog_index: 8.8 6.54236453202 135% => OK
flesch_kincaid_grade: 12.7 10.9458128079 116% => OK
coleman_liau_index: 13.46 11.5310837438 117% => OK
dale_chall_readability_score: 9.22 8.32886699507 111% => OK
difficult_words: 73.0 55.0591133005 133% => OK
linsear_write_formula: 14.0 9.94827586207 141% => OK
gunning_fog: 10.4 10.3980295567 100% => OK
text_standard: 14.0 10.5123152709 133% => OK
What are above readability scores?
---------------------
Rates: 85.0 out of 100
Scores by essay e-grader: 76.5 Out of 90
---------------------
Note: the e-grader does NOT examine the meaning of words and ideas. VIP users will receive further evaluations by advanced module of e-grader and human graders.