Vegetarianism is a more ethical practice than eating meat.Discuss the extent to which you agree or disagree with this statement. Support your point of view with reasons and/or examples from your own experience or observations.

Essay topics:

Vegetarianism is a more ethical practice than eating meat.
Discuss the extent to which you agree or disagree with this statement. Support your point of view with reasons and/or examples from your own experience or observations.

Vegetarianism has become increasingly popular in recent times. People often choose to become vegetarian because it is considered to be more ethical than being a meat eater. This essay will discuss the reasons why vegetarianism is, in fact, a much more ethical practice when compared to eating meat.

Vegetarianism is more ethical than eating meat because it does not harm animals. Clearly harming animals causes suffering, which is unethical. For example, millions of chickens are killed each day for human consumption. Vegetarians do not participate in the killing of animals, which is a much more ethical practice than eating meat.

Vegetarianism is also much more ethical than eating meat because its impact on the environment is far less. Growing vegetables is good for the environment, whereas farming animals impacts the environment. Beef cattle, for instance, destroy topsoil and damage the atmosphere. Vegetarianism is a more ethical practice because it does not harm the natural world.

In conclusion, this essay discussed why vegetarianism is more ethical than eating meat because it does not harm animals and it does not damage the environment. In my opinion, vegetarianism is a far more ethical practice than eating meat.

Votes
Average: 5.5 (1 vote)
Essay Categories

Comments

Transition Words or Phrases used:
also, so, whereas, for example, for instance, in conclusion, in fact, in my opinion

Attributes: Values AverageValues Percentages(Values/AverageValues)% => Comments

Performance on Part of Speech:
To be verbs : 14.0 10.5418719212 133% => OK
Auxiliary verbs: 1.0 6.10837438424 16% => OK
Conjunction : 2.0 8.36945812808 24% => More conjunction wanted.
Relative clauses : 3.0 5.94088669951 50% => More relative clauses wanted.
Pronoun: 9.0 20.9802955665 43% => OK
Preposition: 11.0 31.9359605911 34% => More preposition wanted.
Nominalization: 6.0 5.75862068966 104% => OK

Performance on vocabulary words:
No of characters: 1051.0 1207.87684729 87% => OK
No of words: 194.0 242.827586207 80% => More content wanted.
Chars per words: 5.4175257732 5.00649968141 108% => OK
Fourth root words length: 3.73207559907 3.92707691288 95% => OK
Word Length SD: 2.98955296519 2.71678728327 110% => OK
Unique words: 96.0 139.433497537 69% => More unique words wanted.
Unique words percentage: 0.494845360825 0.580463131201 85% => More unique words wanted or less content wanted.
syllable_count: 335.7 379.143842365 89% => OK
avg_syllables_per_word: 1.7 1.57093596059 108% => OK

A sentence (or a clause, phrase) starts by:
Pronoun: 2.0 4.6157635468 43% => OK
Article: 1.0 1.56157635468 64% => OK
Subordination: 0.0 1.71428571429 0% => More adverbial clause wanted.
Conjunction: 0.0 0.931034482759 0% => OK
Preposition: 3.0 3.65517241379 82% => OK

Performance on sentences:
How many sentences: 13.0 12.6551724138 103% => OK
Sentence length: 14.0 20.5024630542 68% => The Avg. Sentence Length is relatively short.
Sentence length SD: 27.1615809424 50.4703680194 54% => The essay contains lots of sentences with the similar length. More sentence varieties wanted.
Chars per sentence: 80.8461538462 104.977214359 77% => OK
Words per sentence: 14.9230769231 20.9669160288 71% => OK
Discourse Markers: 6.38461538462 7.25397266985 88% => OK
Paragraphs: 4.0 4.12807881773 97% => OK
Language errors: 0.0 5.33497536946 0% => OK
Sentences with positive sentiment : 9.0 6.9802955665 129% => OK
Sentences with negative sentiment : 4.0 2.75862068966 145% => OK
Sentences with neutral sentiment: 0.0 2.91625615764 0% => More facts, knowledge or examples wanted.
What are sentences with positive/Negative/neutral sentiment?

Coherence and Cohesion:
Essay topic to essay body coherence: 0.282842647097 0.242375264174 117% => OK
Sentence topic coherence: 0.128561529282 0.0925447433944 139% => OK
Sentence topic coherence SD: 0.0982730947497 0.071462118173 138% => OK
Paragraph topic coherence: 0.211910715785 0.151781067708 140% => OK
Paragraph topic coherence SD: 0.0481125113008 0.0609392437508 79% => OK

Essay readability:
automated_readability_index: 11.6 12.6369458128 92% => Automated_readability_index is low.
flesch_reading_ease: 48.81 53.1260098522 92% => OK
smog_index: 8.8 6.54236453202 135% => OK
flesch_kincaid_grade: 9.9 10.9458128079 90% => OK
coleman_liau_index: 13.56 11.5310837438 118% => OK
dale_chall_readability_score: 8.32 8.32886699507 100% => OK
difficult_words: 49.0 55.0591133005 89% => OK
linsear_write_formula: 7.5 9.94827586207 75% => OK
gunning_fog: 7.6 10.3980295567 73% => OK
text_standard: 8.0 10.5123152709 76% => OK
What are above readability scores?

---------------------
Minimum 200 words wanted.

Rates: 55.5555555556 out of 100
Scores by essay e-grader: 50.0 Out of 90
---------------------
Note: the e-grader does NOT examine the meaning of words and ideas. VIP users will receive further evaluations by advanced module of e-grader and human graders.