What is your view on the idea that it takes failure to achieve success?
Majority of successful people have ample experience of failures behind their glittering success. Though some people argue success is possible without a single experience of failure, in my perspective, success comes after numerous failures.
Firstly, success in huge task needs determination, persistence, painstaking and so forth. There are less chances for anybody to achieve triumph in their set targets without sufficient preparations. Thus, many successful people suggest the imagination of the scenario and rehearsal before going through the actual task. For instance, most of all practice in exam format before taking real exam. Why people do such rehearsal? Indeed, such imagination of exact scenario helps to identify the possible mistakes and one can correct those mistakes.
Second, mentor can guide nobody everywhere but failures guide. During the phase of performing the tasks, one has to face many hindrances and struggles, but these obstacles prepare one for future endeavours. Jack Ma, the founder of Alibaba-online shopping portal, has experienced myriads of bitter experience in life while haunting the job; he later was successful in establishing the most successful online portal.
In a nutshell, failures are the real mentor to guide us towards the success. Whether the task is small or huge, every work demands imagination of exact scenario to identify the possible failures.
Grammar and spelling errors:
Line 3, column 101, Rule ID: FEWER_LESS[2]
Message: Did you mean 'fewer'? The noun chances is countable.
Suggestion: fewer
...ce, painstaking and so forth. There are less chances for anybody to achieve triumph ...
^^^^
Line 7, column 124, Rule ID: POSSESIVE_APOSTROPHE[1]
Message: Possible typo: apostrophe is missing. Did you mean 'demands'' or 'demand's'?
Suggestion: demands'; demand's
...r the task is small or huge, every work demands imagination of exact scenario to identi...
^^^^^^^
Transition Words or Phrases used:
but, first, firstly, if, second, so, thus, while, as to, for instance
Attributes: Values AverageValues Percentages(Values/AverageValues)% => Comments
Performance on Part of Speech:
To be verbs : 5.0 10.5418719212 47% => More to be verbs wanted.
Auxiliary verbs: 2.0 6.10837438424 33% => OK
Conjunction : 7.0 8.36945812808 84% => OK
Relative clauses : 0.0 5.94088669951 0% => More relative clauses wanted.
Pronoun: 7.0 20.9802955665 33% => OK
Preposition: 30.0 31.9359605911 94% => OK
Nominalization: 8.0 5.75862068966 139% => OK
Performance on vocabulary words:
No of characters: 1196.0 1207.87684729 99% => OK
No of words: 212.0 242.827586207 87% => More content wanted.
Chars per words: 5.64150943396 5.00649968141 113% => OK
Fourth root words length: 3.81578560438 3.92707691288 97% => OK
Word Length SD: 2.87293194925 2.71678728327 106% => OK
Unique words: 136.0 139.433497537 98% => OK
Unique words percentage: 0.641509433962 0.580463131201 111% => OK
syllable_count: 375.3 379.143842365 99% => OK
avg_syllables_per_word: 1.8 1.57093596059 115% => OK
A sentence (or a clause, phrase) starts by:
Pronoun: 1.0 4.6157635468 22% => OK
Article: 1.0 1.56157635468 64% => OK
Subordination: 1.0 1.71428571429 58% => OK
Conjunction: 1.0 0.931034482759 107% => OK
Preposition: 3.0 3.65517241379 82% => OK
Performance on sentences:
How many sentences: 13.0 12.6551724138 103% => OK
Sentence length: 16.0 20.5024630542 78% => The Avg. Sentence Length is relatively short.
Sentence length SD: 42.542564832 50.4703680194 84% => OK
Chars per sentence: 92.0 104.977214359 88% => OK
Words per sentence: 16.3076923077 20.9669160288 78% => OK
Discourse Markers: 5.30769230769 7.25397266985 73% => OK
Paragraphs: 4.0 4.12807881773 97% => OK
Language errors: 2.0 5.33497536946 37% => OK
Sentences with positive sentiment : 6.0 6.9802955665 86% => OK
Sentences with negative sentiment : 5.0 2.75862068966 181% => OK
Sentences with neutral sentiment: 2.0 2.91625615764 69% => OK
What are sentences with positive/Negative/neutral sentiment?
Coherence and Cohesion:
Essay topic to essay body coherence: 0.171163947422 0.242375264174 71% => OK
Sentence topic coherence: 0.058986919869 0.0925447433944 64% => OK
Sentence topic coherence SD: 0.0528488650718 0.071462118173 74% => OK
Paragraph topic coherence: 0.102902075293 0.151781067708 68% => OK
Paragraph topic coherence SD: 0.0332487208944 0.0609392437508 55% => OK
Essay readability:
automated_readability_index: 13.3 12.6369458128 105% => OK
flesch_reading_ease: 38.31 53.1260098522 72% => OK
smog_index: 8.8 6.54236453202 135% => OK
flesch_kincaid_grade: 11.9 10.9458128079 109% => OK
coleman_liau_index: 15.14 11.5310837438 131% => OK
dale_chall_readability_score: 8.82 8.32886699507 106% => OK
difficult_words: 59.0 55.0591133005 107% => OK
linsear_write_formula: 7.0 9.94827586207 70% => OK
gunning_fog: 8.4 10.3980295567 81% => OK
text_standard: 9.0 10.5123152709 86% => OK
What are above readability scores?
---------------------
Rates: 77.7777777778 out of 100
Scores by essay e-grader: 70.0 Out of 90
---------------------
Note: the e-grader does NOT examine the meaning of words and ideas. VIP users will receive further evaluations by advanced module of e-grader and human graders.