How has social media brought about cultural change in people’s mindsets?
Media and communication brings changes in thoughts of people. Social media like facebook, twitter are also accountable to bring both positive and negative cultural differences. This essay will discuss the positive and negative impact in the culture that social communication brings.
To begin with, nowadays people share many activities in the social media. One can learn the cultural aspects of others from their sharing in the social media. It is wise to learn and follow the good aspects of others culture; social media has made this happen. People from one corner of the world are able to learn the better part of other cultures. For instance, people of Australia when scroll the social posts of Asian people, Australians can see Asians dedicating enough in their work during office hours and rest of time they are with family. This is the reason behind why Asian have high happiness index. From this, western people learn the value of family to remain oneself happy.
On the contrary, people are copying others culture without understanding the essence. Some people of my country celebrate festivals of every cultural people; they spent most of their time following others lifestyle in social media, and they are forgetting to enjoy their work, life. This is the major demerit of social media.
In a nutshell, social media brings advantages as well as disadvantages. In this era of sophisticated technology, social media cannot be neglected, but one should be wise enough to use social media for their progress.
Grammar and spelling errors:
Line 5, column 199, Rule ID: POSSESIVE_APOSTROPHE[1]
Message: Possible typo: apostrophe is missing. Did you mean 'others'' or 'other's'?
Suggestion: others'; other's
...they spent most of their time following others lifestyle in social media, and they are...
^^^^^^
Transition Words or Phrases used:
also, but, if, so, well, for instance, as well as, on the contrary, to begin with
Attributes: Values AverageValues Percentages(Values/AverageValues)% => Comments
Performance on Part of Speech:
To be verbs : 10.0 10.5418719212 95% => OK
Auxiliary verbs: 5.0 6.10837438424 82% => OK
Conjunction : 7.0 8.36945812808 84% => OK
Relative clauses : 2.0 5.94088669951 34% => More relative clauses wanted.
Pronoun: 18.0 20.9802955665 86% => OK
Preposition: 39.0 31.9359605911 122% => OK
Nominalization: 4.0 5.75862068966 69% => OK
Performance on vocabulary words:
No of characters: 1280.0 1207.87684729 106% => OK
No of words: 248.0 242.827586207 102% => OK
Chars per words: 5.16129032258 5.00649968141 103% => OK
Fourth root words length: 3.96837696647 3.92707691288 101% => OK
Word Length SD: 2.52828690053 2.71678728327 93% => OK
Unique words: 140.0 139.433497537 100% => OK
Unique words percentage: 0.564516129032 0.580463131201 97% => OK
syllable_count: 400.5 379.143842365 106% => OK
avg_syllables_per_word: 1.6 1.57093596059 102% => OK
A sentence (or a clause, phrase) starts by:
Pronoun: 5.0 4.6157635468 108% => OK
Article: 0.0 1.56157635468 0% => OK
Subordination: 0.0 1.71428571429 0% => More adverbial clause wanted.
Conjunction: 2.0 0.931034482759 215% => Less conjunction wanted as sentence beginning.
Preposition: 5.0 3.65517241379 137% => OK
Performance on sentences:
How many sentences: 15.0 12.6551724138 119% => OK
Sentence length: 16.0 20.5024630542 78% => The Avg. Sentence Length is relatively short.
Sentence length SD: 44.6340179186 50.4703680194 88% => OK
Chars per sentence: 85.3333333333 104.977214359 81% => OK
Words per sentence: 16.5333333333 20.9669160288 79% => OK
Discourse Markers: 5.4 7.25397266985 74% => OK
Paragraphs: 4.0 4.12807881773 97% => OK
Language errors: 1.0 5.33497536946 19% => OK
Sentences with positive sentiment : 10.0 6.9802955665 143% => OK
Sentences with negative sentiment : 1.0 2.75862068966 36% => More negative sentences wanted.
Sentences with neutral sentiment: 4.0 2.91625615764 137% => OK
What are sentences with positive/Negative/neutral sentiment?
Coherence and Cohesion:
Essay topic to essay body coherence: 0.290453644248 0.242375264174 120% => OK
Sentence topic coherence: 0.11692134178 0.0925447433944 126% => OK
Sentence topic coherence SD: 0.051592403966 0.071462118173 72% => OK
Paragraph topic coherence: 0.193953447192 0.151781067708 128% => OK
Paragraph topic coherence SD: 0.0162111648582 0.0609392437508 27% => Paragraphs are similar to each other. Some content may get duplicated or it is not exactly right on the topic.
Essay readability:
automated_readability_index: 11.1 12.6369458128 88% => Automated_readability_index is low.
flesch_reading_ease: 55.24 53.1260098522 104% => OK
smog_index: 3.1 6.54236453202 47% => Smog_index is low.
flesch_kincaid_grade: 9.5 10.9458128079 87% => OK
coleman_liau_index: 12.35 11.5310837438 107% => OK
dale_chall_readability_score: 8.12 8.32886699507 97% => OK
difficult_words: 58.0 55.0591133005 105% => OK
linsear_write_formula: 7.0 9.94827586207 70% => OK
gunning_fog: 8.4 10.3980295567 81% => OK
text_standard: 10.0 10.5123152709 95% => OK
What are above readability scores?
---------------------
Rates: 55.5555555556 out of 100
Scores by essay e-grader: 50.0 Out of 90
---------------------
Note: the e-grader does NOT examine the meaning of words and ideas. VIP users will receive further evaluations by advanced module of e-grader and human graders.