As a result of advances in medical care, average life expectancy is increasing for men and women. Do you think most people will see this as a positive development? What are the disadvantages of an ageing population for individuals and society?
With the advancement of technologies in medical field, mean life of people is increasing. This essay will first discuss about the peoples’ opinion regarding the aforementioned statement and then will discuss the disadvantages of ageing people in a nation.
Majority of people consider increase in life expectancy as an index of development. Due to invention of sophisticated devices which support medical procedures, people do not have to die in minor diseases which used to be a life-threatening challenge in the past. For instance, RIRS, a method to remove stone from kidney by simply inserting laser fibre and without surgery helps patient to complete one’s treatment within an hour with bare risk whereas before people had to worry whether they would lose their precious life due to over bleeding and infection in kidney.
There are few disadvantages of ageing population in the society. Firstly, ageing population barely work to earn their bread which means nation should take responsibility of their health insurances and so forth. Secondly, most of ageing group are dogmatic and are against the changing system. Hence, they try to bar the new arrivals through voting rights. For example, in Japan more than half population are aged above sixty and those candidates who think to embark noble system on loses the election which indeed hinder the youths benefitting from novice system.
In a nutshell, general population mass consider improvement in life duration as a positive sign of development. However, the demerits that comes along with the increase in number of aged population cannot be neglected.
Transition Words or Phrases used:
first, firstly, hence, however, if, regarding, second, secondly, so, then, whereas, for example, for instance
Attributes: Values AverageValues Percentages(Values/AverageValues)% => Comments
Performance on Part of Speech:
To be verbs : 7.0 10.5418719212 66% => OK
Auxiliary verbs: 5.0 6.10837438424 82% => OK
Conjunction : 6.0 8.36945812808 72% => OK
Relative clauses : 6.0 5.94088669951 101% => OK
Pronoun: 8.0 20.9802955665 38% => OK
Preposition: 49.0 31.9359605911 153% => OK
Nominalization: 16.0 5.75862068966 278% => Less nominalizations (nouns with a suffix like: tion ment ence ance) wanted.
Performance on vocabulary words:
No of characters: 1375.0 1207.87684729 114% => OK
No of words: 256.0 242.827586207 105% => OK
Chars per words: 5.37109375 5.00649968141 107% => OK
Fourth root words length: 4.0 3.92707691288 102% => OK
Word Length SD: 2.91773342425 2.71678728327 107% => OK
Unique words: 167.0 139.433497537 120% => OK
Unique words percentage: 0.65234375 0.580463131201 112% => OK
syllable_count: 432.9 379.143842365 114% => OK
avg_syllables_per_word: 1.7 1.57093596059 108% => OK
A sentence (or a clause, phrase) starts by:
Pronoun: 2.0 4.6157635468 43% => OK
Article: 2.0 1.56157635468 128% => OK
Subordination: 0.0 1.71428571429 0% => More adverbial clause wanted.
Conjunction: 0.0 0.931034482759 0% => OK
Preposition: 3.0 3.65517241379 82% => OK
Performance on sentences:
How many sentences: 12.0 12.6551724138 95% => OK
Sentence length: 21.0 20.5024630542 102% => OK
Sentence length SD: 69.878614993 50.4703680194 138% => OK
Chars per sentence: 114.583333333 104.977214359 109% => OK
Words per sentence: 21.3333333333 20.9669160288 102% => OK
Discourse Markers: 9.08333333333 7.25397266985 125% => OK
Paragraphs: 4.0 4.12807881773 97% => OK
Language errors: 0.0 5.33497536946 0% => OK
Sentences with positive sentiment : 5.0 6.9802955665 72% => OK
Sentences with negative sentiment : 3.0 2.75862068966 109% => OK
Sentences with neutral sentiment: 4.0 2.91625615764 137% => OK
What are sentences with positive/Negative/neutral sentiment?
Coherence and Cohesion:
Essay topic to essay body coherence: 0.280817496849 0.242375264174 116% => OK
Sentence topic coherence: 0.0968670362787 0.0925447433944 105% => OK
Sentence topic coherence SD: 0.04961688947 0.071462118173 69% => OK
Paragraph topic coherence: 0.152889431645 0.151781067708 101% => OK
Paragraph topic coherence SD: 0.0299677179071 0.0609392437508 49% => Paragraphs are similar to each other. Some content may get duplicated or it is not exactly right on the topic.
Essay readability:
automated_readability_index: 14.5 12.6369458128 115% => OK
flesch_reading_ease: 41.7 53.1260098522 78% => OK
smog_index: 8.8 6.54236453202 135% => OK
flesch_kincaid_grade: 12.7 10.9458128079 116% => OK
coleman_liau_index: 13.87 11.5310837438 120% => OK
dale_chall_readability_score: 9.49 8.32886699507 114% => OK
difficult_words: 78.0 55.0591133005 142% => OK
linsear_write_formula: 12.0 9.94827586207 121% => OK
gunning_fog: 10.4 10.3980295567 100% => OK
text_standard: 9.0 10.5123152709 86% => OK
What are above readability scores?
---------------------
Rates: 80.0 out of 100
Scores by essay e-grader: 72.0 Out of 90
---------------------
Note: the e-grader does NOT examine the meaning of words and ideas. VIP users will receive further evaluations by advanced module of e-grader and human graders.