Most high level jobs are done by men. Should governments encourage that a certain percentage of these jobs be reserved for women? What is your opinion?
Although women are also performing works other than house chores, men are seen in top-level jobs. In my perspective, government should reserve top-level jobs for women.
Firstly, women are equally capable of doing any type of works; though they might not have performed all the various types of work, but they have proved themselves in many arenas by accomplishing the works perfectly. Hence, government should reserve some high level works for women. If women get such opportunities, it give rise to sense of equality which on top of everything, is theirs right. For instance, in an online survey, it is revealed that women become completely delighted when they receive equals of everything.
Secondly, if government assign some top priority jobs to women, it will make women more responsible part of the society. Women who are about half of total population need to equally accountable as men are. One of the companies of Japan who is leading in quality cameras has assigned male and female counterparts equally in high ranked tasks. This shows that, if they are provided with opportunity, it improves the efficiency and productivity.
In a nutshell, women should be also provided top level responsibility since this makes them equally accountable towards the society and on the top of everything, it gives sense of equality.
Grammar and spelling errors:
Line 3, column 319, Rule ID: IT_VBZ[1]
Message: Did you mean 'gives'?
Suggestion: gives
...en. If women get such opportunities, it give rise to sense of equality which on top ...
^^^^
Transition Words or Phrases used:
also, but, first, firstly, hence, if, second, secondly, so, for instance
Attributes: Values AverageValues Percentages(Values/AverageValues)% => Comments
Performance on Part of Speech:
To be verbs : 10.0 10.5418719212 95% => OK
Auxiliary verbs: 6.0 6.10837438424 98% => OK
Conjunction : 4.0 8.36945812808 48% => More conjunction wanted.
Relative clauses : 6.0 5.94088669951 101% => OK
Pronoun: 17.0 20.9802955665 81% => OK
Preposition: 27.0 31.9359605911 85% => OK
Nominalization: 5.0 5.75862068966 87% => OK
Performance on vocabulary words:
No of characters: 1123.0 1207.87684729 93% => OK
No of words: 216.0 242.827586207 89% => More content wanted.
Chars per words: 5.19907407407 5.00649968141 104% => OK
Fourth root words length: 3.83365862548 3.92707691288 98% => OK
Word Length SD: 2.83423717731 2.71678728327 104% => OK
Unique words: 137.0 139.433497537 98% => OK
Unique words percentage: 0.634259259259 0.580463131201 109% => OK
syllable_count: 360.9 379.143842365 95% => OK
avg_syllables_per_word: 1.7 1.57093596059 108% => OK
A sentence (or a clause, phrase) starts by:
Pronoun: 6.0 4.6157635468 130% => OK
Article: 0.0 1.56157635468 0% => OK
Subordination: 5.0 1.71428571429 292% => Less adverbial clause wanted.
Conjunction: 1.0 0.931034482759 107% => OK
Preposition: 3.0 3.65517241379 82% => OK
Performance on sentences:
How many sentences: 11.0 12.6551724138 87% => OK
Sentence length: 19.0 20.5024630542 93% => OK
Sentence length SD: 44.622382554 50.4703680194 88% => OK
Chars per sentence: 102.090909091 104.977214359 97% => OK
Words per sentence: 19.6363636364 20.9669160288 94% => OK
Discourse Markers: 6.54545454545 7.25397266985 90% => OK
Paragraphs: 4.0 4.12807881773 97% => OK
Language errors: 1.0 5.33497536946 19% => OK
Sentences with positive sentiment : 6.0 6.9802955665 86% => OK
Sentences with negative sentiment : 0.0 2.75862068966 0% => More negative sentences wanted.
Sentences with neutral sentiment: 5.0 2.91625615764 171% => OK
What are sentences with positive/Negative/neutral sentiment?
Coherence and Cohesion:
Essay topic to essay body coherence: 0.240770038262 0.242375264174 99% => OK
Sentence topic coherence: 0.114381664044 0.0925447433944 124% => OK
Sentence topic coherence SD: 0.120308294829 0.071462118173 168% => OK
Paragraph topic coherence: 0.16111142603 0.151781067708 106% => OK
Paragraph topic coherence SD: 0.072884445363 0.0609392437508 120% => OK
Essay readability:
automated_readability_index: 12.9 12.6369458128 102% => OK
flesch_reading_ease: 43.73 53.1260098522 82% => OK
smog_index: 8.8 6.54236453202 135% => OK
flesch_kincaid_grade: 11.9 10.9458128079 109% => OK
coleman_liau_index: 12.88 11.5310837438 112% => OK
dale_chall_readability_score: 8.89 8.32886699507 107% => OK
difficult_words: 59.0 55.0591133005 107% => OK
linsear_write_formula: 8.0 9.94827586207 80% => OK
gunning_fog: 9.6 10.3980295567 92% => OK
text_standard: 13.0 10.5123152709 124% => OK
What are above readability scores?
---------------------
Rates: 80.0 out of 100
Scores by essay e-grader: 72.0 Out of 90
---------------------
Note: the e-grader does NOT examine the meaning of words and ideas. VIP users will receive further evaluations by advanced module of e-grader and human graders.