When celebrities endorse products and services, people usually feel attracted to these products. Does such attraction put more responsibility on the shoulders of these celebrities?
Support your opinion with reasons and examples from your personal experience.
In modren era people are generally influenced by attractive thing specially when this things are promoted by their favorite celebrities and person. I think that it is it is not responsibilty of celebrities but it is depend upon individual and product making company. I will discuss my views in forthcoming paragraphs.
To embark with, I want to say that celebrities are doing their work by promoting any product like other normal person so it is only responsibilty of company who endorse this products. Mainly number of companies are very selfish for selling bad products because they now that it is easily purchased by individuals when someone special person adverties it. Furthermore, there is need to become aware bad types of products and specially buy this materials by investigating it properly.
Also, advertisments are necessary to provide knowledge about new products but purchasing them is depend on consumer because attraction of product is personal choice that is never cahnged by any celebritie. The whole responsibilty is depend on companies because they cheat with people by making and selling this products in market.
I completly concur that masses are not take such efforts to investigate regarding any product before purchasing it.
To conclude, I ponder that there is strong need to create social awareness which is only gain by individual self efforts and secondly companies also should not cheat person.
Grammar and spelling errors:
Line 2, column 82, Rule ID: THIS_NNS[1]
Message: Did you mean 'these'?
Suggestion: these
...nced by attractive thing specially when this things are promoted by their favorite c...
^^^^
Line 2, column 162, Rule ID: PHRASE_REPETITION[1]
Message: This phrase is duplicated. You should probably leave only 'it is'.
Suggestion: it is
...te celebrities and person. I think that it is it is not responsibilty of celebrities but it...
^^^^^^^^^^^
Line 2, column 217, Rule ID: BEEN_PART_AGREEMENT[1]
Message: Consider using a past participle here: 'depended'.
Suggestion: depended
... responsibilty of celebrities but it is depend upon individual and product making comp...
^^^^^^
Line 3, column 170, Rule ID: THIS_NNS[1]
Message: Did you mean 'these'?
Suggestion: these
...ly responsibilty of company who endorse this products. Mainly number of companies ar...
^^^^
Line 4, column 98, Rule ID: BEEN_PART_AGREEMENT[1]
Message: Consider using a past participle here: 'depended'.
Suggestion: depended
...out new products but purchasing them is depend on consumer because attraction of produ...
^^^^^^
Line 4, column 233, Rule ID: BEEN_PART_AGREEMENT[1]
Message: Consider using a past participle here: 'depended'.
Suggestion: depended
... celebritie. The whole responsibilty is depend on companies because they cheat with pe...
^^^^^^
Line 4, column 306, Rule ID: THIS_NNS[1]
Message: Did you mean 'these'?
Suggestion: these
...cheat with people by making and selling this products in market. I completly concur...
^^^^
Transition Words or Phrases used:
also, but, furthermore, regarding, second, secondly, so, i think
Attributes: Values AverageValues Percentages(Values/AverageValues)% => Comments
Performance on Part of Speech:
To be verbs : 18.0 10.5418719212 171% => OK
Auxiliary verbs: 4.0 6.10837438424 65% => OK
Conjunction : 7.0 8.36945812808 84% => OK
Relative clauses : 10.0 5.94088669951 168% => OK
Pronoun: 29.0 20.9802955665 138% => Less pronouns wanted
Preposition: 32.0 31.9359605911 100% => OK
Nominalization: 1.0 5.75862068966 17% => More nominalizations (nouns with a suffix like: tion ment ence ance) wanted.
Performance on vocabulary words:
No of characters: 1206.0 1207.87684729 100% => OK
No of words: 228.0 242.827586207 94% => More content wanted.
Chars per words: 5.28947368421 5.00649968141 106% => OK
Fourth root words length: 3.88582923847 3.92707691288 99% => OK
Word Length SD: 2.92539585439 2.71678728327 108% => OK
Unique words: 132.0 139.433497537 95% => More unique words wanted.
Unique words percentage: 0.578947368421 0.580463131201 100% => OK
syllable_count: 384.3 379.143842365 101% => OK
avg_syllables_per_word: 1.7 1.57093596059 108% => OK
A sentence (or a clause, phrase) starts by:
Pronoun: 5.0 4.6157635468 108% => OK
Article: 1.0 1.56157635468 64% => OK
Subordination: 0.0 1.71428571429 0% => More adverbial clause wanted.
Conjunction: 0.0 0.931034482759 0% => OK
Preposition: 3.0 3.65517241379 82% => OK
Performance on sentences:
How many sentences: 10.0 12.6551724138 79% => Need more sentences. Double check the format of sentences, make sure there is a space between two sentences, or have enough periods. And also check the lengths of sentences, maybe they are too long.
Sentence length: 22.0 20.5024630542 107% => OK
Sentence length SD: 42.1089064213 50.4703680194 83% => OK
Chars per sentence: 120.6 104.977214359 115% => OK
Words per sentence: 22.8 20.9669160288 109% => OK
Discourse Markers: 6.4 7.25397266985 88% => OK
Paragraphs: 5.0 4.12807881773 121% => OK
Language errors: 7.0 5.33497536946 131% => OK
Sentences with positive sentiment : 4.0 6.9802955665 57% => More positive sentences wanted.
Sentences with negative sentiment : 3.0 2.75862068966 109% => OK
Sentences with neutral sentiment: 3.0 2.91625615764 103% => OK
What are sentences with positive/Negative/neutral sentiment?
Coherence and Cohesion:
Essay topic to essay body coherence: 0.175451564929 0.242375264174 72% => OK
Sentence topic coherence: 0.0698289532699 0.0925447433944 75% => OK
Sentence topic coherence SD: 0.0484484059499 0.071462118173 68% => OK
Paragraph topic coherence: 0.0923260747767 0.151781067708 61% => OK
Paragraph topic coherence SD: 0.0516108096733 0.0609392437508 85% => OK
Essay readability:
automated_readability_index: 14.9 12.6369458128 118% => OK
flesch_reading_ease: 40.69 53.1260098522 77% => OK
smog_index: 8.8 6.54236453202 135% => OK
flesch_kincaid_grade: 13.1 10.9458128079 120% => OK
coleman_liau_index: 13.7 11.5310837438 119% => OK
dale_chall_readability_score: 8.81 8.32886699507 106% => OK
difficult_words: 59.0 55.0591133005 107% => OK
linsear_write_formula: 11.5 9.94827586207 116% => OK
gunning_fog: 10.8 10.3980295567 104% => OK
text_standard: 9.0 10.5123152709 86% => OK
What are above readability scores?
---------------------
Rates: 77.7777777778 out of 100
Scores by essay e-grader: 70.0 Out of 90
---------------------
Note: the e-grader does NOT examine the meaning of words and ideas. VIP users will receive further evaluations by advanced module of e-grader and human graders.