Do you think evaluation of teacher's performance by students is good method of improving him/ her or does it demotivates him / her?
The performance of students depends on teacher’s way teaching performance, but there are number of factors contributed to their improvement. So, evaluation of tutor is not best way to judge to improve learner’s performance, oppositely it demotivates the teacher up to large extent. I will discuss this easy in forthcoming paragraphs with examples.
Highlighting my views, I deem that judgment of trainers by students is not relevant way, as instructors do their best for student to improve their overall performance and scores in study as well as in exams. They provide lots of sources to students to improve their grades. For examples, they take extra classes of students, so they can devote more time to study and clear their doubts as well. Furthermore, it will decrease the dignity and respect of teacher, namely pupils ignores the instructions of students due to freedom even teacher give them in right way.
The another conducive idea in my mind is that only management should evaluate the students performance, but evaluation by students is not right one. Teachers are more experienced then pupils, so student can assume themselves as superior one. Lastly, if students may take evaluation as wrong way and can do this in negative ways, which may leads to students teachers conflict and breakdown of good relation that exist between them.
To conclude, one can say that evaluation is only responsibility of higher authorities of teachers rather than learner. It is very important to establish strong bond between teacher and students, as they learn each and every thing from them.
Grammar and spelling errors:
Line 1, column 174, Rule ID: THE_SUPERLATIVE[4]
Message: A determiner is probably missing here: 'not the best'.
Suggestion: not the best
...improvement. So, evaluation of tutor is not best way to judge to improve learner's ...
^^^^^^^^
Line 5, column 83, Rule ID: POSSESIVE_APOSTROPHE[2]
Message: Possible typo: apostrophe is missing. Did you mean 'students'' or 'student's'?
Suggestion: students'; student's
...hat only management should evaluate the students performance, but evaluation by students...
^^^^^^^^
Line 5, column 180, Rule ID: LESS_MORE_THEN[1]
Message: Did you mean 'than'?
Suggestion: than
...ight one. Teachers are more experienced then pupils, so student can assume themselve...
^^^^
Transition Words or Phrases used:
but, furthermore, if, lastly, may, so, then, well, for example, as well as
Attributes: Values AverageValues Percentages(Values/AverageValues)% => Comments
Performance on Part of Speech:
To be verbs : 8.0 10.5418719212 76% => OK
Auxiliary verbs: 9.0 6.10837438424 147% => OK
Conjunction : 9.0 8.36945812808 108% => OK
Relative clauses : 5.0 5.94088669951 84% => OK
Pronoun: 26.0 20.9802955665 124% => Less pronouns wanted
Preposition: 37.0 31.9359605911 116% => OK
Nominalization: 13.0 5.75862068966 226% => Less nominalizations (nouns with a suffix like: tion ment ence ance) wanted.
Performance on vocabulary words:
No of characters: 1350.0 1207.87684729 112% => OK
No of words: 258.0 242.827586207 106% => OK
Chars per words: 5.23255813953 5.00649968141 105% => OK
Fourth root words length: 4.00778971557 3.92707691288 102% => OK
Word Length SD: 2.95430211175 2.71678728327 109% => OK
Unique words: 150.0 139.433497537 108% => OK
Unique words percentage: 0.581395348837 0.580463131201 100% => OK
syllable_count: 408.6 379.143842365 108% => OK
avg_syllables_per_word: 1.6 1.57093596059 102% => OK
A sentence (or a clause, phrase) starts by:
Pronoun: 6.0 4.6157635468 130% => OK
Article: 2.0 1.56157635468 128% => OK
Subordination: 3.0 1.71428571429 175% => OK
Conjunction: 2.0 0.931034482759 215% => Less conjunction wanted as sentence beginning.
Preposition: 1.0 3.65517241379 27% => More preposition wanted as sentence beginning.
Performance on sentences:
How many sentences: 12.0 12.6551724138 95% => OK
Sentence length: 21.0 20.5024630542 102% => OK
Sentence length SD: 42.5143766533 50.4703680194 84% => OK
Chars per sentence: 112.5 104.977214359 107% => OK
Words per sentence: 21.5 20.9669160288 103% => OK
Discourse Markers: 6.16666666667 7.25397266985 85% => OK
Paragraphs: 4.0 4.12807881773 97% => OK
Language errors: 3.0 5.33497536946 56% => OK
Sentences with positive sentiment : 8.0 6.9802955665 115% => OK
Sentences with negative sentiment : 2.0 2.75862068966 72% => OK
Sentences with neutral sentiment: 2.0 2.91625615764 69% => OK
What are sentences with positive/Negative/neutral sentiment?
Coherence and Cohesion:
Essay topic to essay body coherence: 0.217771704141 0.242375264174 90% => OK
Sentence topic coherence: 0.0839181513595 0.0925447433944 91% => OK
Sentence topic coherence SD: 0.052054506264 0.071462118173 73% => OK
Paragraph topic coherence: 0.133459286368 0.151781067708 88% => OK
Paragraph topic coherence SD: 0.0457306004943 0.0609392437508 75% => OK
Essay readability:
automated_readability_index: 14.0 12.6369458128 111% => OK
flesch_reading_ease: 50.16 53.1260098522 94% => OK
smog_index: 8.8 6.54236453202 135% => OK
flesch_kincaid_grade: 11.5 10.9458128079 105% => OK
coleman_liau_index: 13.05 11.5310837438 113% => OK
dale_chall_readability_score: 8.72 8.32886699507 105% => OK
difficult_words: 66.0 55.0591133005 120% => OK
linsear_write_formula: 11.5 9.94827586207 116% => OK
gunning_fog: 10.4 10.3980295567 100% => OK
text_standard: 12.0 10.5123152709 114% => OK
What are above readability scores?
---------------------
Rates: 80.0 out of 100
Scores by essay e-grader: 72.0 Out of 90
---------------------
Note: the e-grader does NOT examine the meaning of words and ideas. VIP users will receive further evaluations by advanced module of e-grader and human graders.