means of communication changed from last 10 years . discuss it
Technology bestrode us with number of advantages especially changes are seen in way of communication of people from bygone era to present time. This is great change in life, standard of individual. There are a plethora of changes in daily life of person, which I will discuss in upcoming paragraphs.
To embark with, I believed that from past days to today number of alterations can be noticed in individual’s life. For instance, in past time people used post cards as a method of sending massages to other, which is replaced with text massages, online communication with help of internet. Furthermore, previously distance between one place to another is more and this distance is reduced with telephone, facebook and other application of internet.
Another conducive idea in my mind is that now due to easier communication process relations of masses become strong. People remain interact with each other with the efforts of internet facilities all over the world. Namely, even person who is unable to travel to other place can communicate with their relatives. Lastly, nowadays masses arte so busy due to hectic schedule that they do not have a enough time to visit other friends and relatives. But, it is possible with communication and person can see through online calling.
To conclude, I want to say that communication advancements are big contribution of technology for people to make their personal life better and to maintain strong bonds in relations
| Post date | Users | Rates | Link to Content |
|---|---|---|---|
| 2023-09-27 | mohammadsabet | 77 | view |
| 2023-01-16 | woutan | 88 | view |
| 2023-01-16 | woutan | 77 | view |
| 2022-01-09 | amolsharma44 | 77 | view |
| 2021-12-09 | sahar.sharifi.1984 | 85 | view |
- Discuss the role of native place behind successful person 81
- young people should choose their job freely but some people think that parents and/ or teachers should choose the job for them. 77
- libraries are declining day by day what are the reasons 85
- travel to study is overrated. we have brillent scholars, who study locally. Is traveling really required for higher studies. 77
- people think that university study for young people is good in our country and other think that mechanics and builders should be encouraged the most because our country need them. discuss both views and own views 85
Grammar and spelling errors:
Line 2, column 137, Rule ID: PAST_TIME[1]
Message: Did you mean 'pastime'?
Suggestion: pastime
...ndividual's life. For instance, in past time people used post cards as a method of s...
^^^^^^^^^
Line 2, column 193, Rule ID: MASSAGE_MESSAGE[1]
Message: Did you mean 'messages'?
Suggestion: messages
... used post cards as a method of sending massages to other, which is replaced with text m...
^^^^^^^^
Line 2, column 240, Rule ID: MASSAGE_MESSAGE[1]
Message: Did you mean 'messages'?
Suggestion: messages
...s to other, which is replaced with text massages, online communication with help of inte...
^^^^^^^^
Line 3, column 395, Rule ID: EN_A_VS_AN
Message: Use 'an' instead of 'a' if the following word starts with a vowel sound, e.g. 'an article', 'an hour'
Suggestion: an
...o hectic schedule that they do not have a enough time to visit other friends and ...
^
Line 4, column 182, Rule ID: WHITESPACE_RULE
Message: Possible typo: you repeated a whitespace
Suggestion:
...nd to maintain strong bonds in relations
^^^^
Transition Words or Phrases used:
but, furthermore, if, lastly, so, for instance
Attributes: Values AverageValues Percentages(Values/AverageValues)% => Comments
Performance on Part of Speech:
To be verbs : 11.0 10.5418719212 104% => OK
Auxiliary verbs: 4.0 6.10837438424 65% => OK
Conjunction : 5.0 8.36945812808 60% => More conjunction wanted.
Relative clauses : 7.0 5.94088669951 118% => OK
Pronoun: 15.0 20.9802955665 71% => OK
Preposition: 51.0 31.9359605911 160% => OK
Nominalization: 10.0 5.75862068966 174% => OK
Performance on vocabulary words:
No of characters: 1233.0 1207.87684729 102% => OK
No of words: 239.0 242.827586207 98% => OK
Chars per words: 5.1589958159 5.00649968141 103% => OK
Fourth root words length: 3.93187294222 3.92707691288 100% => OK
Word Length SD: 2.95590629903 2.71678728327 109% => OK
Unique words: 147.0 139.433497537 105% => OK
Unique words percentage: 0.615062761506 0.580463131201 106% => OK
syllable_count: 400.5 379.143842365 106% => OK
avg_syllables_per_word: 1.7 1.57093596059 108% => OK
A sentence (or a clause, phrase) starts by:
Pronoun: 4.0 4.6157635468 87% => OK
Article: 0.0 1.56157635468 0% => OK
Subordination: 0.0 1.71428571429 0% => More adverbial clause wanted.
Conjunction: 0.0 0.931034482759 0% => OK
Preposition: 3.0 3.65517241379 82% => OK
Performance on sentences:
How many sentences: 12.0 12.6551724138 95% => OK
Sentence length: 19.0 20.5024630542 93% => OK
Sentence length SD: 36.637867478 50.4703680194 73% => OK
Chars per sentence: 102.75 104.977214359 98% => OK
Words per sentence: 19.9166666667 20.9669160288 95% => OK
Discourse Markers: 3.83333333333 7.25397266985 53% => More transition words/phrases wanted.
Paragraphs: 4.0 4.12807881773 97% => OK
Language errors: 5.0 5.33497536946 94% => OK
Sentences with positive sentiment : 7.0 6.9802955665 100% => OK
Sentences with negative sentiment : 0.0 2.75862068966 0% => More negative sentences wanted.
Sentences with neutral sentiment: 5.0 2.91625615764 171% => OK
What are sentences with positive/Negative/neutral sentiment?
Coherence and Cohesion:
Essay topic to essay body coherence: 0.129488549443 0.242375264174 53% => OK
Sentence topic coherence: 0.0540949188119 0.0925447433944 58% => OK
Sentence topic coherence SD: 0.0452834528306 0.071462118173 63% => OK
Paragraph topic coherence: 0.0881920923957 0.151781067708 58% => OK
Paragraph topic coherence SD: 0.0699002925934 0.0609392437508 115% => OK
Essay readability:
automated_readability_index: 12.8 12.6369458128 101% => OK
flesch_reading_ease: 43.73 53.1260098522 82% => OK
smog_index: 8.8 6.54236453202 135% => OK
flesch_kincaid_grade: 11.9 10.9458128079 109% => OK
coleman_liau_index: 12.65 11.5310837438 110% => OK
dale_chall_readability_score: 8.74 8.32886699507 105% => OK
difficult_words: 63.0 55.0591133005 114% => OK
linsear_write_formula: 11.5 9.94827586207 116% => OK
gunning_fog: 9.6 10.3980295567 92% => OK
text_standard: 13.0 10.5123152709 124% => OK
What are above readability scores?
---------------------
Rates: 85.0 out of 100
Scores by essay e-grader: 76.5 Out of 90
---------------------
Note: the e-grader does NOT examine the meaning of words and ideas. VIP users will receive further evaluations by advanced module of e-grader and human graders.