Whether design of building will have a positive or negative impact on people’s life and work?
In this contemporary era, the human society is forging ahead at an amazing rate with various realms. Yet, at the same time, many problems have arisen, a grave issue that the design of building has triggered intensive controversy. In my opinion, a well-design building is positively to human being
Undeniably, it is more likely that a good architecture would enhance people's living standard. More specifically, designing the orientation and texture of the building properly could make warm in winter and cool in summer, which can save energy and money. also, eco-friendly house tends to use nature sources to build, which not only reduce waste and pollution but also benefit people's health. Thus, living in this kind of building is economical and comfortable.
Furthermore, it should recognize that building with design represent the unique architectural style what plays a vital role in cityscape, especially when these buildings are the landmark. In particular, these buildings, such as historical buildings, enable individuals to understand the culture of the city because it provides an authentic feeling for inhabitants and tourists to know the essence of a city. Therefore, the significance of these buildings is their aesthetic values and cultural value.
To summarize, from what has been discussed, I highly support the idea that the design of building has a positive effect on the society and humankind for a long time.
Grammar and spelling errors:
Line 3, column 1, Rule ID: WHITESPACE_RULE
Message: Possible typo: you repeated a whitespace
Suggestion:
...uilding is positively to human being Undeniably, it is more likely that a goo...
^^^^^
Line 5, column 256, Rule ID: UPPERCASE_SENTENCE_START
Message: This sentence does not start with an uppercase letter
Suggestion: Also
...ummer, which can save energy and money. also, eco-friendly house tends to use nature...
^^^^
Line 7, column 1, Rule ID: WHITESPACE_RULE
Message: Possible typo: you repeated a whitespace
Suggestion:
...lding is economical and comfortable. Furthermore, it should recognize that bu...
^^^^^
Line 11, column 1, Rule ID: WHITESPACE_RULE
Message: Possible typo: you repeated a whitespace
Suggestion:
...aesthetic values and cultural value. To summarize, from what has been discuss...
^^^^^
Transition Words or Phrases used:
also, but, furthermore, if, so, then, therefore, thus, well, in particular, kind of, such as, in my opinion
Attributes: Values AverageValues Percentages(Values/AverageValues)% => Comments
Performance on Part of Speech:
To be verbs : 8.0 10.5418719212 76% => OK
Auxiliary verbs: 4.0 6.10837438424 65% => OK
Conjunction : 9.0 8.36945812808 108% => OK
Relative clauses : 7.0 5.94088669951 118% => OK
Pronoun: 15.0 20.9802955665 71% => OK
Preposition: 26.0 31.9359605911 81% => OK
Nominalization: 5.0 5.75862068966 87% => OK
Performance on vocabulary words:
No of characters: 1224.0 1207.87684729 101% => OK
No of words: 226.0 242.827586207 93% => More content wanted.
Chars per words: 5.41592920354 5.00649968141 108% => OK
Fourth root words length: 3.87727950738 3.92707691288 99% => OK
Word Length SD: 2.95266385207 2.71678728327 109% => OK
Unique words: 149.0 139.433497537 107% => OK
Unique words percentage: 0.659292035398 0.580463131201 114% => OK
syllable_count: 386.1 379.143842365 102% => OK
avg_syllables_per_word: 1.7 1.57093596059 108% => OK
A sentence (or a clause, phrase) starts by:
Pronoun: 4.0 4.6157635468 87% => OK
Article: 4.0 1.56157635468 256% => Less articles wanted as sentence beginning.
Subordination: 0.0 1.71428571429 0% => More adverbial clause wanted.
Conjunction: 0.0 0.931034482759 0% => OK
Preposition: 6.0 3.65517241379 164% => OK
Performance on sentences:
How many sentences: 10.0 12.6551724138 79% => Need more sentences. Double check the format of sentences, make sure there is a space between two sentences, or have enough periods. And also check the lengths of sentences, maybe they are too long.
Sentence length: 22.0 20.5024630542 107% => OK
Sentence length SD: 44.0935369414 50.4703680194 87% => OK
Chars per sentence: 122.4 104.977214359 117% => OK
Words per sentence: 22.6 20.9669160288 108% => OK
Discourse Markers: 10.7 7.25397266985 148% => OK
Paragraphs: 4.0 4.12807881773 97% => OK
Language errors: 4.0 5.33497536946 75% => OK
Sentences with positive sentiment : 9.0 6.9802955665 129% => OK
Sentences with negative sentiment : 1.0 2.75862068966 36% => More negative sentences wanted.
Sentences with neutral sentiment: 0.0 2.91625615764 0% => More facts, knowledge or examples wanted.
What are sentences with positive/Negative/neutral sentiment?
Coherence and Cohesion:
Essay topic to essay body coherence: 0.203143949622 0.242375264174 84% => OK
Sentence topic coherence: 0.0763173679268 0.0925447433944 82% => OK
Sentence topic coherence SD: 0.0497646442113 0.071462118173 70% => OK
Paragraph topic coherence: 0.116687630878 0.151781067708 77% => OK
Paragraph topic coherence SD: 0.0262914451577 0.0609392437508 43% => Paragraphs are similar to each other. Some content may get duplicated or it is not exactly right on the topic.
Essay readability:
automated_readability_index: 15.4 12.6369458128 122% => OK
flesch_reading_ease: 40.69 53.1260098522 77% => OK
smog_index: 8.8 6.54236453202 135% => OK
flesch_kincaid_grade: 13.1 10.9458128079 120% => OK
coleman_liau_index: 14.45 11.5310837438 125% => OK
dale_chall_readability_score: 9.97 8.32886699507 120% => OK
difficult_words: 75.0 55.0591133005 136% => OK
linsear_write_formula: 11.5 9.94827586207 116% => OK
gunning_fog: 10.8 10.3980295567 104% => OK
text_standard: 11.0 10.5123152709 105% => OK
What are above readability scores?
---------------------
Rates: 80.0 out of 100
Scores by essay e-grader: 72.0 Out of 90
---------------------
Note: the e-grader does NOT examine the meaning of words and ideas. VIP users will receive further evaluations by advanced module of e-grader and human graders.