It is increasingly acknowledged that buildings have some impacts on people’s daily life. While some people believe that the impacts that buildings have are more of negative impacts, others advocate that the positive impacts overweigh the negative influence in respect of buildings. As far as I am concerned, I tend to be the advocate regarding this issue.
The good design of buildings may influence people’s daily life in many ways. Firstly, an appropriate design will promote work efficiency for people. This is to say, workers who work in a good working environment are more likely to work efficiently. This is because a good working set-up will positively impact employees, both physically and psychologically. For instance, an office building with a gym will encourage workers to do exercises when they have time, which will lead to healthy lifestyles. Moreover, a good healthy body will provide more energy for working in returns.
In addition, buildings with good design are crucial parts of a city’s history. To illustrate that, the Sydney Opera will be an excellent example. As it is a vital part of Sydney’s historical heritage, tourists from all over the world come to Sydney every year to see it. Hence, citizens who live in Sydney also get benefits from the enhanced tourism.
In a nutshell, while this controversial topic never fails to attract the public attention, we can safely reach the conclusion that the good design of buildings has a significantly positive influence on people’s daily life.
Grammar and spelling errors:
Line 1, column 158, Rule ID: HAVE_PART_AGREEMENT[1]
Message: Use past participle here: 'been'.
Suggestion: been
...ve that the impacts that buildings have are more of negative impacts, others advoca...
^^^
Line 3, column 377, Rule ID: WHITESPACE_RULE
Message: Possible typo: you repeated a whitespace
Suggestion:
...cally and psychologically. For instance, an office building with a gym will encou...
^^
Transition Words or Phrases used:
also, first, firstly, hence, if, may, moreover, regarding, so, while, for instance, in addition
Attributes: Values AverageValues Percentages(Values/AverageValues)% => Comments
Performance on Part of Speech:
To be verbs : 9.0 10.5418719212 85% => OK
Auxiliary verbs: 8.0 6.10837438424 131% => OK
Conjunction : 1.0 8.36945812808 12% => More conjunction wanted.
Relative clauses : 10.0 5.94088669951 168% => OK
Pronoun: 17.0 20.9802955665 81% => OK
Preposition: 31.0 31.9359605911 97% => OK
Nominalization: 7.0 5.75862068966 122% => OK
Performance on vocabulary words:
No of characters: 1301.0 1207.87684729 108% => OK
No of words: 246.0 242.827586207 101% => OK
Chars per words: 5.28861788618 5.00649968141 106% => OK
Fourth root words length: 3.96035189615 3.92707691288 101% => OK
Word Length SD: 3.03023355877 2.71678728327 112% => OK
Unique words: 142.0 139.433497537 102% => OK
Unique words percentage: 0.577235772358 0.580463131201 99% => OK
syllable_count: 407.7 379.143842365 108% => OK
avg_syllables_per_word: 1.7 1.57093596059 108% => OK
A sentence (or a clause, phrase) starts by:
Pronoun: 5.0 4.6157635468 108% => OK
Article: 5.0 1.56157635468 320% => Less articles wanted as sentence beginning.
Subordination: 4.0 1.71428571429 233% => Less adverbial clause wanted.
Conjunction: 0.0 0.931034482759 0% => OK
Preposition: 3.0 3.65517241379 82% => OK
Performance on sentences:
How many sentences: 14.0 12.6551724138 111% => OK
Sentence length: 17.0 20.5024630542 83% => The Avg. Sentence Length is relatively short.
Sentence length SD: 46.7782436784 50.4703680194 93% => OK
Chars per sentence: 92.9285714286 104.977214359 89% => OK
Words per sentence: 17.5714285714 20.9669160288 84% => OK
Discourse Markers: 6.78571428571 7.25397266985 94% => OK
Paragraphs: 4.0 4.12807881773 97% => OK
Language errors: 2.0 5.33497536946 37% => OK
Sentences with positive sentiment : 11.0 6.9802955665 158% => OK
Sentences with negative sentiment : 1.0 2.75862068966 36% => More negative sentences wanted.
Sentences with neutral sentiment: 2.0 2.91625615764 69% => OK
What are sentences with positive/Negative/neutral sentiment?
Coherence and Cohesion:
Essay topic to essay body coherence: 0.483383834912 0.242375264174 199% => OK
Sentence topic coherence: 0.154264015943 0.0925447433944 167% => OK
Sentence topic coherence SD: 0.113154458058 0.071462118173 158% => OK
Paragraph topic coherence: 0.265633832048 0.151781067708 175% => OK
Paragraph topic coherence SD: 0.114628649678 0.0609392437508 188% => OK
Essay readability:
automated_readability_index: 12.3 12.6369458128 97% => OK
flesch_reading_ease: 45.76 53.1260098522 86% => OK
smog_index: 3.1 6.54236453202 47% => Smog_index is low.
flesch_kincaid_grade: 11.1 10.9458128079 101% => OK
coleman_liau_index: 13.11 11.5310837438 114% => OK
dale_chall_readability_score: 8.78 8.32886699507 105% => OK
difficult_words: 67.0 55.0591133005 122% => OK
linsear_write_formula: 8.0 9.94827586207 80% => OK
gunning_fog: 8.8 10.3980295567 85% => OK
text_standard: 9.0 10.5123152709 86% => OK
What are above readability scores?
---------------------
Rates: 72.2222222222 out of 100
Scores by essay e-grader: 65.0 Out of 90
---------------------
Note: the e-grader does NOT examine the meaning of words and ideas. VIP users will receive further evaluations by advanced module of e-grader and human graders.