Whether design of building will have a positive or negative impact on people's life and work? Do you agree or disagree?
Of late, there has been a colossal upsurge among the prodigies discussing the influence of building on an individual’s life as well as working environment. Some people think that the design of the building bears no effect on a person, while others maintain that the architecture of the building has many benefits on people’s personal and working life. This essay will discuss the positive impacts of building on the working and private life of an individual.
At the outset, there are myriad of arguments associated with the design of the building. Firstly, the most conspicuous is the uplifting of moral and boosting the work efficiency with more zeal and zest. The interior layout of the building encompassing all safety measures, for example, proper fire exist, an air conditioned environment and well structured offices not only provides a safe working environment but also the employees perform job with more enthusiasm and dedication. As a result, it is quite evident that the design of the building has extreme impacts on an individual.
On the other hand, another pivotal facet pertaining to this argument is that well structured and designed buildings is the penetration and exposure of natural resources to the residents or workers. Sunlight has Vitamin ‘D’ which is an essential element for survival of human beings. For instance, a study in “Time magazine” has revealed that 40% of people working in closed offices are Vitamin ‘D’ deficient. As a matter of fact, one of the most important aspect of well designed buildings is provisioning of Vitamin ‘D’ to maintain a healthy life.
To recapitulate, foregoing discussion propounds that well designed and structured buildings not only motivates a worker and boosts his pace but also provides exposure to Vitamin ‘D’ for a healthy life.
Transition Words or Phrases used:
also, but, first, firstly, if, so, thus, well, while, for example, for instance, as a matter of fact, as a result, as well as, on the other hand
Attributes: Values AverageValues Percentages(Values/AverageValues)% => Comments
Performance on Part of Speech:
To be verbs : 9.0 10.5418719212 85% => OK
Auxiliary verbs: 1.0 6.10837438424 16% => OK
Conjunction : 13.0 8.36945812808 155% => OK
Relative clauses : 7.0 5.94088669951 118% => OK
Pronoun: 10.0 20.9802955665 48% => OK
Preposition: 36.0 31.9359605911 113% => OK
Nominalization: 9.0 5.75862068966 156% => OK
Performance on vocabulary words:
No of characters: 1580.0 1207.87684729 131% => OK
No of words: 292.0 242.827586207 120% => OK
Chars per words: 5.41095890411 5.00649968141 108% => OK
Fourth root words length: 4.13376432452 3.92707691288 105% => OK
Word Length SD: 3.12434643194 2.71678728327 115% => OK
Unique words: 152.0 139.433497537 109% => OK
Unique words percentage: 0.520547945205 0.580463131201 90% => More unique words wanted or less content wanted.
syllable_count: 492.3 379.143842365 130% => OK
avg_syllables_per_word: 1.7 1.57093596059 108% => OK
A sentence (or a clause, phrase) starts by:
Pronoun: 2.0 4.6157635468 43% => OK
Article: 4.0 1.56157635468 256% => Less articles wanted as sentence beginning.
Subordination: 3.0 1.71428571429 175% => OK
Conjunction: 0.0 0.931034482759 0% => OK
Preposition: 5.0 3.65517241379 137% => OK
Performance on sentences:
How many sentences: 12.0 12.6551724138 95% => OK
Sentence length: 24.0 20.5024630542 117% => OK
Sentence length SD: 55.622986855 50.4703680194 110% => OK
Chars per sentence: 131.666666667 104.977214359 125% => OK
Words per sentence: 24.3333333333 20.9669160288 116% => OK
Discourse Markers: 12.0 7.25397266985 165% => OK
Paragraphs: 4.0 4.12807881773 97% => OK
Language errors: 0.0 5.33497536946 0% => OK
Sentences with positive sentiment : 10.0 6.9802955665 143% => OK
Sentences with negative sentiment : 1.0 2.75862068966 36% => More negative sentences wanted.
Sentences with neutral sentiment: 1.0 2.91625615764 34% => More facts, knowledge or examples wanted.
What are sentences with positive/Negative/neutral sentiment?
Coherence and Cohesion:
Essay topic to essay body coherence: 0.321084169848 0.242375264174 132% => OK
Sentence topic coherence: 0.131858934457 0.0925447433944 142% => OK
Sentence topic coherence SD: 0.0767919579125 0.071462118173 107% => OK
Paragraph topic coherence: 0.204150305647 0.151781067708 135% => OK
Paragraph topic coherence SD: 0.0895895014198 0.0609392437508 147% => OK
Essay readability:
automated_readability_index: 16.2 12.6369458128 128% => OK
flesch_reading_ease: 38.66 53.1260098522 73% => OK
smog_index: 8.8 6.54236453202 135% => OK
flesch_kincaid_grade: 13.8 10.9458128079 126% => OK
coleman_liau_index: 14.39 11.5310837438 125% => OK
dale_chall_readability_score: 9.32 8.32886699507 112% => OK
difficult_words: 83.0 55.0591133005 151% => OK
linsear_write_formula: 11.0 9.94827586207 111% => OK
gunning_fog: 11.6 10.3980295567 112% => OK
text_standard: 14.0 10.5123152709 133% => OK
What are above readability scores?
---------------------
Rates: 77.7777777778 out of 100
Scores by essay e-grader: 70.0 Out of 90
---------------------
Note: the e-grader does NOT examine the meaning of words and ideas. VIP users will receive further evaluations by advanced module of e-grader and human graders.