Some people always follow their dreams even if the dreams are ambitious. Some think we should focus on achieving realistic goals. Which do you agree with? Why?
In today's modern and sophisticated world, defining goals in life plays a vital role in people's success. In this connection, people have different targets in their lives. Although contested by many that the matter of following a realistic goal is highly beneficial, such an issue is regarded as both constructive and positive by a substantial number of individuals. I concur with the notion that pursuing ambitious dreams should be designated as a scope, and I will analyze my reasons throughout this essay.
First, by following an ambitious goal, one can develop their skills, which helps them to become a skillful person in their lives. To be more specific, when one faces the challenges which are new and dreamy, they should try harder than the situation in which they should follow normal goals. By doing so, people can find their talents as well as abilities, which they did not discover in routine life. According to my own experience, I was interested in paintings; however, it was not my major at university. I started to follow my dream about drawing a girl on canvas; however, my friend, who was a great artist believed that I could not perform the task as I did not study painting methods. I watched many informative painting programs on Youtube to learn requirements; thus, I could draw a wonderful girl, so much so that my friend invited me to depict my painting in her exhibition. If I had not followed my dream, I would not have become familiar with my painting skills.
Second, people feel satisfied with their lives when they define their dreams as their scopes regardless of the results. To elucidate, it is satisfying to follow dreams even if the consequence is not desirable because the importance is enjoying the moments which one dedicates to achieve dreams. For example, my brother had a dream to participate in a marathon, so I advised him to try his chance. Accordingly, he registered in the marathon, and he allocated a tremendous amount of time to practice and preparing himself for the race. Although he was exhausted after running, he was happy as he tried t for his dream. He participated in the marathon, and he could not finish this, but he did not feel upset since he enjoyed all the seconds, which he focused on his ambitious dream.
To conclude, while there are several arguments on each side, I profoundly believe that people should follow their dreams. Not only does the following desires help people to evolve their skills, but it also gives meaning to one's life.
Grammar and spelling errors:
Line 3, column 977, Rule ID: WHITESPACE_RULE
Message: Possible typo: you repeated a whitespace
Suggestion:
...ecome familiar with my painting skills. Second, people feel satisfied with their...
^^^^^^^
Line 5, column 138, Rule ID: PROGRESSIVE_VERBS[1]
Message: This verb is normally not used in the progressive form. Try a simple form instead.
...rdless of the results. To elucidate, it is satisfying to follow dreams even if the consequenc...
^^^^^^^^^^^^^
Line 7, column 224, Rule ID: ONES[1]
Message: Did you mean 'one's'?
Suggestion: one's
...ir skills, but it also gives meaning to ones life.
^^^^
Line 7, column 235, Rule ID: WHITESPACE_RULE
Message: Possible typo: you repeated a whitespace
Suggestion:
...but it also gives meaning to ones life.
^^^^^^^^
Transition Words or Phrases used:
accordingly, also, but, first, however, if, second, so, thus, well, while, for example, as well as
Attributes: Values AverageValues Percentages(Values/AverageValues)% => Comments
Performance on Part of Speech:
To be verbs : 14.0 15.1003584229 93% => OK
Auxiliary verbs: 11.0 9.8082437276 112% => OK
Conjunction : 9.0 13.8261648746 65% => OK
Relative clauses : 14.0 11.0286738351 127% => OK
Pronoun: 64.0 43.0788530466 149% => Less pronouns wanted
Preposition: 48.0 52.1666666667 92% => OK
Nominalization: 6.0 8.0752688172 74% => OK
Performance on vocabulary words:
No of characters: 2087.0 1977.66487455 106% => OK
No of words: 429.0 407.700716846 105% => OK
Chars per words: 4.8648018648 4.8611393121 100% => OK
Fourth root words length: 4.55107846309 4.48103885553 102% => OK
Word Length SD: 2.74245569542 2.67179642975 103% => OK
Unique words: 234.0 212.727598566 110% => OK
Unique words percentage: 0.545454545455 0.524837075471 104% => OK
syllable_count: 638.1 618.680645161 103% => OK
avg_syllables_per_word: 1.5 1.51630824373 99% => OK
A sentence (or a clause, phrase) starts by:
Pronoun: 15.0 9.59856630824 156% => OK
Article: 0.0 3.08781362007 0% => OK
Subordination: 5.0 3.51792114695 142% => OK
Conjunction: 5.0 1.86738351254 268% => Less conjunction wanted as sentence beginning.
Preposition: 8.0 4.94265232975 162% => OK
Performance on sentences:
How many sentences: 19.0 20.6003584229 92% => OK
Sentence length: 22.0 20.1344086022 109% => OK
Sentence length SD: 37.2139877791 48.9658058833 76% => OK
Chars per sentence: 109.842105263 100.406767564 109% => OK
Words per sentence: 22.5789473684 20.6045352989 110% => OK
Discourse Markers: 5.15789473684 5.45110844103 95% => OK
Paragraphs: 4.0 4.53405017921 88% => OK
Language errors: 4.0 5.5376344086 72% => OK
Sentences with positive sentiment : 15.0 11.8709677419 126% => OK
Sentences with negative sentiment : 1.0 3.85842293907 26% => More negative sentences wanted.
Sentences with neutral sentiment: 3.0 4.88709677419 61% => OK
What are sentences with positive/Negative/neutral sentiment?
Coherence and Cohesion:
Essay topic to essay body coherence: 0.26670730704 0.236089414692 113% => OK
Sentence topic coherence: 0.0858521680392 0.076458572812 112% => OK
Sentence topic coherence SD: 0.0529272920634 0.0737576698707 72% => OK
Paragraph topic coherence: 0.15984317554 0.150856017488 106% => OK
Paragraph topic coherence SD: 0.0150230721123 0.0645574589148 23% => Paragraphs are similar to each other. Some content may get duplicated or it is not exactly right on the topic.
Essay readability:
automated_readability_index: 12.8 11.7677419355 109% => OK
flesch_reading_ease: 57.61 58.1214874552 99% => OK
smog_index: 3.1 6.10430107527 51% => Smog_index is low.
flesch_kincaid_grade: 10.7 10.1575268817 105% => OK
coleman_liau_index: 11.2 10.9000537634 103% => OK
dale_chall_readability_score: 8.45 8.01818996416 105% => OK
difficult_words: 101.0 86.8835125448 116% => OK
linsear_write_formula: 11.0 10.002688172 110% => OK
gunning_fog: 10.8 10.0537634409 107% => OK
text_standard: 11.0 10.247311828 107% => OK
What are above readability scores?
---------------------
Better to have 5 paragraphs with 3 arguments. And try always support/against one side but compare two sides, like this:
para 1: introduction
para 2: reason 1. address both of the views presented for reason 1
para 3: reason 2. address both of the views presented for reason 2
para 4: reason 3. address both of the views presented for reason 3
para 5: conclusion.
So how to find out those reasons. There is a formula:
reasons == advantages or
reasons == disadvantages
for example, we can always apply 'save time', 'save/make money', 'find a job', 'make friends', 'get more information' as reasons to all essay/speaking topics.
or we can apply 'waste time', 'waste money', 'no job', 'make bad friends', 'get bad information' as reasons to all essay/speaking topics.
Rates: 76.6666666667 out of 100
Scores by essay e-grader: 23.0 Out of 30
---------------------
Note: the e-grader does NOT examine the meaning of words and ideas. VIP users will receive further evaluations by advanced module of e-grader and human graders.