Whether the design of buildings will have a positive or negative impact on people's life and work?
Recently, there is a substantive controversy among individuals regarding the impact on people's life and work based on the design of the buildings. The vast majority of people opine that building designs affect a person's life and work. However, others refute the supposition and think that it has adverse ramifications. In this essay, I will elucidate the pertinent points of view to come up with a logical conclusion.
To begin with, there are multifarious reason and cogent arguments that can shore up to this implied notion. Firstly, a building design that is well-built gives confidence to the people staying or living in that property. Especially when there is an earthquake or a typhoon, they will be relieved that they are safe. For an instance, when I am working on my past job, an earthquake has struck Philippines but I am relieved because our building is earthquake-proof. Hence, a good building design gives confidence on the people.
Furthermore, another justification is that a building that has a good design lasts longer and on the long run will have less maintenance. To cite a prime example, a survey was made in the Philippines for all the buildings in the central business district, the age of all the buildings were recorded and the surveyors checked the buildings and found out that well built buildings has a low amount of maintenance fees. Therefore, building owners have less burden for maintaining the building.
In conclusion, buildings that has good designs gives people confidence and a sense of relief and as for the owners, they can keep a low-budget on maintaining the buildings they own.
Grammar and spelling errors:
Line 1, column 213, Rule ID: POSSESIVE_APOSTROPHE[1]
Message: Possible typo: apostrophe is missing. Did you mean 'persons'' or 'person's'?
Suggestion: persons'; person's
...le opine that building designs affect a persons life and work. However, others refute t...
^^^^^^^
Transition Words or Phrases used:
but, first, firstly, furthermore, hence, however, if, regarding, so, therefore, well, as for, in conclusion, to begin with
Attributes: Values AverageValues Percentages(Values/AverageValues)% => Comments
Performance on Part of Speech:
To be verbs : 10.0 10.5418719212 95% => OK
Auxiliary verbs: 5.0 6.10837438424 82% => OK
Conjunction : 12.0 8.36945812808 143% => OK
Relative clauses : 12.0 5.94088669951 202% => Less relative clauses wanted (maybe 'which' is over used).
Pronoun: 22.0 20.9802955665 105% => OK
Preposition: 30.0 31.9359605911 94% => OK
Nominalization: 8.0 5.75862068966 139% => OK
Performance on vocabulary words:
No of characters: 1360.0 1207.87684729 113% => OK
No of words: 269.0 242.827586207 111% => OK
Chars per words: 5.05576208178 5.00649968141 101% => OK
Fourth root words length: 4.0498419064 3.92707691288 103% => OK
Word Length SD: 2.99997927053 2.71678728327 110% => OK
Unique words: 145.0 139.433497537 104% => OK
Unique words percentage: 0.539033457249 0.580463131201 93% => More unique words wanted or less content wanted.
syllable_count: 411.3 379.143842365 108% => OK
avg_syllables_per_word: 1.5 1.57093596059 95% => OK
A sentence (or a clause, phrase) starts by:
Pronoun: 3.0 4.6157635468 65% => OK
Article: 6.0 1.56157635468 384% => Less articles wanted as sentence beginning.
Subordination: 1.0 1.71428571429 58% => OK
Conjunction: 0.0 0.931034482759 0% => OK
Preposition: 4.0 3.65517241379 109% => OK
Performance on sentences:
How many sentences: 13.0 12.6551724138 103% => OK
Sentence length: 20.0 20.5024630542 98% => OK
Sentence length SD: 55.3110622703 50.4703680194 110% => OK
Chars per sentence: 104.615384615 104.977214359 100% => OK
Words per sentence: 20.6923076923 20.9669160288 99% => OK
Discourse Markers: 9.38461538462 7.25397266985 129% => OK
Paragraphs: 4.0 4.12807881773 97% => OK
Language errors: 1.0 5.33497536946 19% => OK
Sentences with positive sentiment : 6.0 6.9802955665 86% => OK
Sentences with negative sentiment : 3.0 2.75862068966 109% => OK
Sentences with neutral sentiment: 4.0 2.91625615764 137% => OK
What are sentences with positive/Negative/neutral sentiment?
Coherence and Cohesion:
Essay topic to essay body coherence: 0.319379056764 0.242375264174 132% => OK
Sentence topic coherence: 0.115578586909 0.0925447433944 125% => OK
Sentence topic coherence SD: 0.0874521060477 0.071462118173 122% => OK
Paragraph topic coherence: 0.19200117696 0.151781067708 126% => OK
Paragraph topic coherence SD: 0.0652624273584 0.0609392437508 107% => OK
Essay readability:
automated_readability_index: 12.7 12.6369458128 100% => OK
flesch_reading_ease: 59.64 53.1260098522 112% => OK
smog_index: 3.1 6.54236453202 47% => Smog_index is low.
flesch_kincaid_grade: 9.9 10.9458128079 90% => OK
coleman_liau_index: 12.07 11.5310837438 105% => OK
dale_chall_readability_score: 8.56 8.32886699507 103% => OK
difficult_words: 67.0 55.0591133005 122% => OK
linsear_write_formula: 8.5 9.94827586207 85% => OK
gunning_fog: 10.0 10.3980295567 96% => OK
text_standard: 10.0 10.5123152709 95% => OK
What are above readability scores?
---------------------
Rates: 77.7777777778 out of 100
Scores by essay e-grader: 70.0 Out of 90
---------------------
Note: the e-grader does NOT examine the meaning of words and ideas. VIP users will receive further evaluations by advanced module of e-grader and human graders.