Whether studying films at school is as important as studying literature(written books)?
One of the most conspicuous trends of today’s world is a colossal upsurge in the number of people arguing that studying films at school are vital as studying literature. As such, there are both merits and demerits to this trend, although I am of the opinion that former outdo the latter.
There are a myriad of arguments in favour of my stance. The most preponderant one is that by offering films at school, pupils can be aware of the traditions, customs, rituals and social life of their ancestors. Not only do dram helps students to understand human behaviour, but it also helps them to follow the right path and avoid wrong customs. Needless to say, all these merits will stand pupils in good stand, when it comes to understanding of aforementioned factors.
There are, however, some drawbacks which can easily overwhelm potential impact of this trend. The primary one stems from the fact that films at school are waste of time and energy. Besides, in the fast growing world, students should pay attention toward modern science and technology which eventually help them in excel in academic and professional fields. Furthermore, these drams and films distract young generation minds. It is apparent that why many are against of such activities at school.
In view of the arguments outlined above, one can conclude that despite having some drawbacks, the potential benefits of films and drams are indeed too great to ignore.
Grammar and spelling errors:
Line 2, column 13, Rule ID: THERE_RE_MANY[3]
Message: Possible agreement error. Did you mean 'myriads'?
Suggestion: myriads
...t former outdo the latter. There are a myriad of arguments in favour of my stance. Th...
^^^^^^
Transition Words or Phrases used:
also, besides, but, furthermore, however, if, so
Attributes: Values AverageValues Percentages(Values/AverageValues)% => Comments
Performance on Part of Speech:
To be verbs : 11.0 10.5418719212 104% => OK
Auxiliary verbs: 5.0 6.10837438424 82% => OK
Conjunction : 9.0 8.36945812808 108% => OK
Relative clauses : 9.0 5.94088669951 151% => OK
Pronoun: 18.0 20.9802955665 86% => OK
Preposition: 37.0 31.9359605911 116% => OK
Nominalization: 3.0 5.75862068966 52% => More nominalizations (nouns with a suffix like: tion ment ence ance) wanted.
Performance on vocabulary words:
No of characters: 1198.0 1207.87684729 99% => OK
No of words: 239.0 242.827586207 98% => OK
Chars per words: 5.01255230126 5.00649968141 100% => OK
Fourth root words length: 3.93187294222 3.92707691288 100% => OK
Word Length SD: 2.63933505437 2.71678728327 97% => OK
Unique words: 152.0 139.433497537 109% => OK
Unique words percentage: 0.635983263598 0.580463131201 110% => OK
syllable_count: 360.0 379.143842365 95% => OK
avg_syllables_per_word: 1.5 1.57093596059 95% => OK
A sentence (or a clause, phrase) starts by:
Pronoun: 2.0 4.6157635468 43% => OK
Article: 3.0 1.56157635468 192% => OK
Subordination: 3.0 1.71428571429 175% => OK
Conjunction: 1.0 0.931034482759 107% => OK
Preposition: 2.0 3.65517241379 55% => More preposition wanted as sentence beginning.
Performance on sentences:
How many sentences: 12.0 12.6551724138 95% => OK
Sentence length: 19.0 20.5024630542 93% => OK
Sentence length SD: 41.7641359968 50.4703680194 83% => OK
Chars per sentence: 99.8333333333 104.977214359 95% => OK
Words per sentence: 19.9166666667 20.9669160288 95% => OK
Discourse Markers: 4.0 7.25397266985 55% => More transition words/phrases wanted.
Paragraphs: 4.0 4.12807881773 97% => OK
Language errors: 1.0 5.33497536946 19% => OK
Sentences with positive sentiment : 6.0 6.9802955665 86% => OK
Sentences with negative sentiment : 4.0 2.75862068966 145% => OK
Sentences with neutral sentiment: 2.0 2.91625615764 69% => OK
What are sentences with positive/Negative/neutral sentiment?
Coherence and Cohesion:
Essay topic to essay body coherence: 0.125268966978 0.242375264174 52% => OK
Sentence topic coherence: 0.0436259943601 0.0925447433944 47% => OK
Sentence topic coherence SD: 0.0717650853522 0.071462118173 100% => OK
Paragraph topic coherence: 0.0733727606116 0.151781067708 48% => OK
Paragraph topic coherence SD: 0.0665035884126 0.0609392437508 109% => OK
Essay readability:
automated_readability_index: 12.1 12.6369458128 96% => OK
flesch_reading_ease: 60.65 53.1260098522 114% => OK
smog_index: 3.1 6.54236453202 47% => Smog_index is low.
flesch_kincaid_grade: 9.5 10.9458128079 87% => OK
coleman_liau_index: 11.78 11.5310837438 102% => OK
dale_chall_readability_score: 8.87 8.32886699507 106% => OK
difficult_words: 65.0 55.0591133005 118% => OK
linsear_write_formula: 10.5 9.94827586207 106% => OK
gunning_fog: 9.6 10.3980295567 92% => OK
text_standard: 10.0 10.5123152709 95% => OK
What are above readability scores?
---------------------
Rates: 72.2222222222 out of 100
Scores by essay e-grader: 65.0 Out of 90
---------------------
Note: the e-grader does NOT examine the meaning of words and ideas. VIP users will receive further evaluations by advanced module of e-grader and human graders.