While people throughout the world are struggling with hunger, many rich people are spending too much on their pets . Discuss the advantages and disadvantages of keeping pets.
Today's era of technology, every person has their own hobby some clans like to keep pets at their home. However, there are also people who have no food to take. According to my perspective, it is the biggest problem now-a-days, that rich persons are spending lots of money on their pets rather than offering to poor public. So, I will try to analyze both pros and cons of keeping pets in forthcoming paragraphs.
To begin with the advantages of pets, firstly, pets are that animals who can secure us from many strangers. For example, a dog which wake all night to look after when people are sleeping, then at night if any stranger enter in the house then it starts barking and with it clans who are sleeping get up and can find the stranger and can secure their property. Moreover, pets can be kept as an interest of the masses.
On the other hand, if public want to take the pets at home then they have to spend money on their nourishment. For instance, a pet take a lots of food to grow up such as a dog which needs feed and meat for his health. Furthermore, the money which clans spend on their food can be used for the economic growth like by rising up people who live under poverty line. Thus, it can be a good job for the sake of humanity.
To sum up with, although, the pets are good for looking after the house but for the sake of humanity masses should also give some cost to the poor public for their food so their nourishment can be done properly in a better way.
Grammar and spelling errors:
Line 5, column 137, Rule ID: A_PLURAL[1]
Message: Don't use indefinite articles with plural words. Did you mean 'a lot' or simply 'lots'?
Suggestion: a lot; lots
...r nourishment. For instance, a pet take a lots of food to grow up such as a dog which ...
^^^^^^
Transition Words or Phrases used:
also, but, first, firstly, furthermore, however, if, look, moreover, so, then, thus, for example, for instance, such as, to begin with, to sum up, on the other hand
Attributes: Values AverageValues Percentages(Values/AverageValues)% => Comments
Performance on Part of Speech:
To be verbs : 11.0 10.5418719212 104% => OK
Auxiliary verbs: 9.0 6.10837438424 147% => OK
Conjunction : 6.0 8.36945812808 72% => OK
Relative clauses : 10.0 5.94088669951 168% => OK
Pronoun: 19.0 20.9802955665 91% => OK
Preposition: 44.0 31.9359605911 138% => OK
Nominalization: 3.0 5.75862068966 52% => More nominalizations (nouns with a suffix like: tion ment ence ance) wanted.
Performance on vocabulary words:
No of characters: 1204.0 1207.87684729 100% => OK
No of words: 279.0 242.827586207 115% => OK
Chars per words: 4.31541218638 5.00649968141 86% => OK
Fourth root words length: 4.08696624509 3.92707691288 104% => OK
Word Length SD: 2.2411094691 2.71678728327 82% => OK
Unique words: 155.0 139.433497537 111% => OK
Unique words percentage: 0.555555555556 0.580463131201 96% => OK
syllable_count: 369.9 379.143842365 98% => OK
avg_syllables_per_word: 1.3 1.57093596059 83% => OK
A sentence (or a clause, phrase) starts by:
Pronoun: 4.0 4.6157635468 87% => OK
Article: 4.0 1.56157635468 256% => Less articles wanted as sentence beginning.
Subordination: 1.0 1.71428571429 58% => OK
Conjunction: 0.0 0.931034482759 0% => OK
Preposition: 4.0 3.65517241379 109% => OK
Performance on sentences:
How many sentences: 12.0 12.6551724138 95% => OK
Sentence length: 23.0 20.5024630542 112% => OK
Sentence length SD: 61.4769039739 50.4703680194 122% => OK
Chars per sentence: 100.333333333 104.977214359 96% => OK
Words per sentence: 23.25 20.9669160288 111% => OK
Discourse Markers: 13.6666666667 7.25397266985 188% => OK
Paragraphs: 4.0 4.12807881773 97% => OK
Language errors: 1.0 5.33497536946 19% => OK
Sentences with positive sentiment : 8.0 6.9802955665 115% => OK
Sentences with negative sentiment : 2.0 2.75862068966 72% => OK
Sentences with neutral sentiment: 2.0 2.91625615764 69% => OK
What are sentences with positive/Negative/neutral sentiment?
Coherence and Cohesion:
Essay topic to essay body coherence: 0.198715876515 0.242375264174 82% => OK
Sentence topic coherence: 0.0791149754149 0.0925447433944 85% => OK
Sentence topic coherence SD: 0.0426554231579 0.071462118173 60% => OK
Paragraph topic coherence: 0.125992521419 0.151781067708 83% => OK
Paragraph topic coherence SD: 0.0445236777107 0.0609392437508 73% => OK
Essay readability:
automated_readability_index: 10.5 12.6369458128 83% => Automated_readability_index is low.
flesch_reading_ease: 73.51 53.1260098522 138% => OK
smog_index: 3.1 6.54236453202 47% => Smog_index is low.
flesch_kincaid_grade: 8.7 10.9458128079 79% => OK
coleman_liau_index: 8.07 11.5310837438 70% => OK
dale_chall_readability_score: 7.21 8.32886699507 87% => OK
difficult_words: 43.0 55.0591133005 78% => More difficult words wanted.
linsear_write_formula: 7.5 9.94827586207 75% => OK
gunning_fog: 11.2 10.3980295567 108% => OK
text_standard: 8.0 10.5123152709 76% => OK
What are above readability scores?
---------------------
Rates: 62.7777777778 out of 100
Scores by essay e-grader: 56.5 Out of 90
---------------------
Note: the e-grader does NOT examine the meaning of words and ideas. VIP users will receive further evaluations by advanced module of e-grader and human graders.