Zoos are harmful for animals and should be banned do you agree or disagree

Essay topics:

Zoos are harmful for animals and should be banned, do you agree or disagree?

A matter of a considerable controversy is whether zoos are helping animals, or rather harming them, thus they should be banned. Strong arguments exist in favor of both points of view. This essay will discuss both sides of this debate before a reasoned conclusion is drawn.

On the one hand, opponents of banning zoos argue against it for several reasons. First, zoos are considered a popular entertaining destination amongst children. Second, animals are safe in zoos, as they are treated regularly by experts. For example, The New York Times reported in March 2012 that a monkey in the national zoo, who suffered from a debilitating disease, was rescued by the zoo's vets. Accordingly, that makes it clear why the argument that zoos should not be banned could be plausible.

On the other hand, there are more convincing arguments in favor of banning zoos. Zoos violate animal rights, who are supposed to live freely in open spaces in their natural homeland, not in a cage in a zoo to entertain visitors. For instance, a study by Queens University found that 45% of lions who are in zoos are suffering from depression. Therefore, it can be easily seen that zoos are harmful and should be banned.

In conclusion, both sides of the argument have strong support. However, after analyzing both camps, I believe that zoos cannot be supported, as such, they are likely to produce more harm to animals in the future. It is recommended that children learn more about preserving animal rights in young age and go to field trips and safaris if they wanted to see the animals.

Votes
Average: 7.9 (7 votes)
Essay Categories
Essays by the user:

Comments

Grammar and spelling errors:
Line 1, column 274, Rule ID: WHITESPACE_RULE
Message: Possible typo: you repeated a whitespace
Suggestion:
... before a reasoned conclusion is drawn. On the one hand, opponents of banning zo...
^^^^^
Line 3, column 501, Rule ID: WHITESPACE_RULE
Message: Possible typo: you repeated a whitespace
Suggestion:
...hould not be banned could be plausible. On the other hand, there are more convin...
^^^^^
Line 5, column 421, Rule ID: WHITESPACE_RULE
Message: Possible typo: you repeated a whitespace
Suggestion:
... zoos are harmful and should be banned. In conclusion, both sides of the argumen...
^^^^^

Transition Words or Phrases used:
accordingly, first, however, if, second, so, therefore, thus, for example, for instance, in conclusion, on the other hand

Attributes: Values AverageValues Percentages(Values/AverageValues)% => Comments

Performance on Part of Speech:
To be verbs : 20.0 10.5418719212 190% => OK
Auxiliary verbs: 7.0 6.10837438424 115% => OK
Conjunction : 4.0 8.36945812808 48% => More conjunction wanted.
Relative clauses : 10.0 5.94088669951 168% => OK
Pronoun: 20.0 20.9802955665 95% => OK
Preposition: 38.0 31.9359605911 119% => OK
Nominalization: 4.0 5.75862068966 69% => OK

Performance on vocabulary words:
No of characters: 1306.0 1207.87684729 108% => OK
No of words: 268.0 242.827586207 110% => OK
Chars per words: 4.87313432836 5.00649968141 97% => OK
Fourth root words length: 4.04607285448 3.92707691288 103% => OK
Word Length SD: 2.6074695213 2.71678728327 96% => OK
Unique words: 162.0 139.433497537 116% => OK
Unique words percentage: 0.60447761194 0.580463131201 104% => OK
syllable_count: 406.8 379.143842365 107% => OK
avg_syllables_per_word: 1.5 1.57093596059 95% => OK

A sentence (or a clause, phrase) starts by:
Pronoun: 6.0 4.6157635468 130% => OK
Article: 3.0 1.56157635468 192% => OK
Subordination: 3.0 1.71428571429 175% => OK
Conjunction: 1.0 0.931034482759 107% => OK
Preposition: 4.0 3.65517241379 109% => OK

Performance on sentences:
How many sentences: 15.0 12.6551724138 119% => OK
Sentence length: 17.0 20.5024630542 83% => The Avg. Sentence Length is relatively short.
Sentence length SD: 34.7962960992 50.4703680194 69% => OK
Chars per sentence: 87.0666666667 104.977214359 83% => OK
Words per sentence: 17.8666666667 20.9669160288 85% => OK
Discourse Markers: 8.06666666667 7.25397266985 111% => OK
Paragraphs: 4.0 4.12807881773 97% => OK
Language errors: 3.0 5.33497536946 56% => OK
Sentences with positive sentiment : 9.0 6.9802955665 129% => OK
Sentences with negative sentiment : 5.0 2.75862068966 181% => OK
Sentences with neutral sentiment: 1.0 2.91625615764 34% => More facts, knowledge or examples wanted.
What are sentences with positive/Negative/neutral sentiment?

Coherence and Cohesion:
Essay topic to essay body coherence: 0.324549071556 0.242375264174 134% => OK
Sentence topic coherence: 0.103611981149 0.0925447433944 112% => OK
Sentence topic coherence SD: 0.101368144129 0.071462118173 142% => OK
Paragraph topic coherence: 0.195772914141 0.151781067708 129% => OK
Paragraph topic coherence SD: 0.064847983667 0.0609392437508 106% => OK

Essay readability:
automated_readability_index: 10.4 12.6369458128 82% => Automated_readability_index is low.
flesch_reading_ease: 62.68 53.1260098522 118% => OK
smog_index: 3.1 6.54236453202 47% => Smog_index is low.
flesch_kincaid_grade: 8.7 10.9458128079 79% => OK
coleman_liau_index: 10.67 11.5310837438 93% => OK
dale_chall_readability_score: 8.6 8.32886699507 103% => OK
difficult_words: 70.0 55.0591133005 127% => OK
linsear_write_formula: 7.0 9.94827586207 70% => OK
gunning_fog: 8.8 10.3980295567 85% => OK
text_standard: 9.0 10.5123152709 86% => OK
What are above readability scores?

---------------------

Rates: 65.0 out of 100
Scores by essay e-grader: 58.5 Out of 90
---------------------
Note: the e-grader does NOT examine the meaning of words and ideas. VIP users will receive further evaluations by advanced module of e-grader and human graders.