Medical technology helps to live long life. Is that curse or blessing for society and mankind?
In recent years, there has been a colossal upsurge in the trend to see the modern technology in medical increasing the life expectancy across the world, be it an affluent or impoverished nation. In this essay, I will elaborate modern medicine helps to live longer, so it can be regarded as one of the society's greatest achievements.
At the outset, there are myriad of reasons which can be attributed to the modern medicines for having a profound effect on the mankind. The most conspicuous one is that the current medication empowers doctors to prevent incurable diseases by finding it very early. Not only new advanced equipment help doctors to go in the right direction to cure a disease, but intelligent people in the world also live a long life, and they help others for a long time through their creative things. Thus, needless to say, all these merits associated with the cutting-edge technology in the medical field keep the humankind in a preponderant position.
However, another pivotal facet of the argument is that the older population is increasing in the country. This could have an adverse economic effect in the developing countries. Moreover, longer longevity also means less young working force in a country resulting in less prosperity and growth. Furthermore, few medicines are addictive for some people, so they cannot live without it and take all their lives. Also, these drugs are very expensive and have taken a commercial shape. Therefore, it hardly needs to mention that all these associated demerits have a far-reaching impact on the society.
To recapitulate from the aforementioned arguments, one can conclude that despite having some pitfalls, the upsides of medication in the current era are indeed too great to ignore.
Grammar and spelling errors:
Line 1, column 302, Rule ID: THE_SUPERLATIVE[2]
Message: A determiner is probably missing here: 'societys the greatest'.
Suggestion: societys the greatest
...er, so it can be regarded as one of the societys greatest achievements. At the outset, there a...
^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^
Transition Words or Phrases used:
also, but, furthermore, however, if, moreover, so, therefore, thus
Attributes: Values AverageValues Percentages(Values/AverageValues)% => Comments
Performance on Part of Speech:
To be verbs : 11.0 10.5418719212 104% => OK
Auxiliary verbs: 6.0 6.10837438424 98% => OK
Conjunction : 6.0 8.36945812808 72% => OK
Relative clauses : 5.0 5.94088669951 84% => OK
Pronoun: 19.0 20.9802955665 91% => OK
Preposition: 37.0 31.9359605911 116% => OK
Nominalization: 8.0 5.75862068966 139% => OK
Performance on vocabulary words:
No of characters: 1475.0 1207.87684729 122% => OK
No of words: 287.0 242.827586207 118% => OK
Chars per words: 5.1393728223 5.00649968141 103% => OK
Fourth root words length: 4.11595363751 3.92707691288 105% => OK
Word Length SD: 2.84417896844 2.71678728327 105% => OK
Unique words: 177.0 139.433497537 127% => OK
Unique words percentage: 0.616724738676 0.580463131201 106% => OK
syllable_count: 476.1 379.143842365 126% => OK
avg_syllables_per_word: 1.7 1.57093596059 108% => OK
A sentence (or a clause, phrase) starts by:
Pronoun: 4.0 4.6157635468 87% => OK
Article: 2.0 1.56157635468 128% => OK
Subordination: 0.0 1.71428571429 0% => More adverbial clause wanted.
Conjunction: 2.0 0.931034482759 215% => Less conjunction wanted as sentence beginning.
Preposition: 4.0 3.65517241379 109% => OK
Performance on sentences:
How many sentences: 13.0 12.6551724138 103% => OK
Sentence length: 22.0 20.5024630542 107% => OK
Sentence length SD: 42.1035634973 50.4703680194 83% => OK
Chars per sentence: 113.461538462 104.977214359 108% => OK
Words per sentence: 22.0769230769 20.9669160288 105% => OK
Discourse Markers: 5.07692307692 7.25397266985 70% => OK
Paragraphs: 4.0 4.12807881773 97% => OK
Language errors: 1.0 5.33497536946 19% => OK
Sentences with positive sentiment : 5.0 6.9802955665 72% => OK
Sentences with negative sentiment : 3.0 2.75862068966 109% => OK
Sentences with neutral sentiment: 5.0 2.91625615764 171% => OK
What are sentences with positive/Negative/neutral sentiment?
Coherence and Cohesion:
Essay topic to essay body coherence: 0.237796739721 0.242375264174 98% => OK
Sentence topic coherence: 0.0617863188677 0.0925447433944 67% => OK
Sentence topic coherence SD: 0.066946518595 0.071462118173 94% => OK
Paragraph topic coherence: 0.128175038648 0.151781067708 84% => OK
Paragraph topic coherence SD: 0.098235271203 0.0609392437508 161% => OK
Essay readability:
automated_readability_index: 13.8 12.6369458128 109% => OK
flesch_reading_ease: 40.69 53.1260098522 77% => OK
smog_index: 8.8 6.54236453202 135% => OK
flesch_kincaid_grade: 13.1 10.9458128079 120% => OK
coleman_liau_index: 12.53 11.5310837438 109% => OK
dale_chall_readability_score: 9.57 8.32886699507 115% => OK
difficult_words: 88.0 55.0591133005 160% => OK
linsear_write_formula: 15.0 9.94827586207 151% => OK
gunning_fog: 10.8 10.3980295567 104% => OK
text_standard: 14.0 10.5123152709 133% => OK
What are above readability scores?
---------------------
Rates: 88.8888888889 out of 100
Scores by essay e-grader: 80.0 Out of 90
---------------------
Note: the e-grader does NOT examine the meaning of words and ideas. VIP users will receive further evaluations by advanced module of e-grader and human graders.