Some effective people like repetitive routine such as eating the same food, do you like this way? Discuss your views.
In recent days, there has been a colossal upsurge in the trend to see prodigies discussing the importance of doing repetitive things done by few effective people. Some believe that performing repetitive tasks will result in monotonous life, while others maintain a view that performing tedious tasks in a same manner could save time. This essay would further elaborate both sides of the arguments and come to a plausible conclusion.
To begin with, some effective people would prefer to continue to perform unimportant routines such as eating same food, wearing same color shirts, and some other daily routines to save time. Mark Zuckerberg, for instance, wears grey t-shirt every day because it is not required to spend time for selection. However, doing monotonous tasks will make people lost interest after some time. Hence, needless to say, effective people doing repetitive tasks, which will save some time to perform other tasks; however, they cannot get much experience by performing those daily routines in the same way and they get easily bored in life.
Another pivotal facet of the argument is that people should come out of habit of doing monotonous routines such as eating same food etc. Performing daily routines in different ways would improve self-confidence and people could gain experience, which is tough to acquire by reading books. Moreover, people following repetitive routines would find difficult to adapt to new environment. According to my own experience, when I was in university, I performed lab experience using a different approach instead of doing it in a routine manner. Therefore, doing repetitive daily routines will not broaden your experience.
To recapitulate from the arguments aforementioned, one can reach out to a conclusion that effective people who are performing their daily routines in a repetitive manner will save some time; however, they can enhance their skills as they are doing a monotonous job without any change.
Grammar and spelling errors:
Line 1, column 1, Rule ID: WHITESPACE_RULE
Message: Possible typo: you repeated a whitespace
Suggestion:
In recent days, there has been a colossa...
^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^
Line 1, column 321, Rule ID: IN_A_X_MANNER[1]
Message: Consider replacing "in a same manner" with adverb for "same"; eg, "in a hasty manner" with "hastily".
...in a view that performing tedious tasks in a same manner could save time. This essay would furth...
^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^
Line 2, column 1, Rule ID: WHITESPACE_RULE
Message: Possible typo: you repeated a whitespace
Suggestion:
...ts and come to a plausible conclusion. To begin with, some effective people wou...
^^^^^^^^^^^
Line 3, column 1, Rule ID: WHITESPACE_RULE
Message: Possible typo: you repeated a whitespace
Suggestion:
...way and they get easily bored in life. Another pivotal facet of the argument is...
^^^^^^^^^^^^^^
Line 3, column 532, Rule ID: IN_A_X_MANNER[1]
Message: Consider replacing "in a routine manner" with adverb for "routine"; eg, "in a hasty manner" with "hastily".
... different approach instead of doing it in a routine manner. Therefore, doing repetitive daily rout...
^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^
Line 4, column 148, Rule ID: IN_A_X_MANNER[1]
Message: Consider replacing "in a repetitive manner" with adverb for "repetitive"; eg, "in a hasty manner" with "hastily".
...who are performing their daily routines in a repetitive manner will save some time; however, they can ...
^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^
Line 4, column 285, Rule ID: WHITESPACE_RULE
Message: Possible typo: you repeated a whitespace
Suggestion:
...ng a monotonous job without any change.
^^^
Transition Words or Phrases used:
hence, however, if, moreover, so, therefore, while, for instance, such as, to begin with, in the same way
Attributes: Values AverageValues Percentages(Values/AverageValues)% => Comments
Performance on Part of Speech:
To be verbs : 7.0 10.5418719212 66% => OK
Auxiliary verbs: 15.0 6.10837438424 246% => Less auxiliary verb wanted.
Conjunction : 4.0 8.36945812808 48% => More conjunction wanted.
Relative clauses : 8.0 5.94088669951 135% => OK
Pronoun: 18.0 20.9802955665 86% => OK
Preposition: 39.0 31.9359605911 122% => OK
Nominalization: 12.0 5.75862068966 208% => Less nominalizations (nouns with a suffix like: tion ment ence ance) wanted.
Performance on vocabulary words:
No of characters: 1658.0 1207.87684729 137% => OK
No of words: 313.0 242.827586207 129% => OK
Chars per words: 5.29712460064 5.00649968141 106% => OK
Fourth root words length: 4.20616286096 3.92707691288 107% => OK
Word Length SD: 2.7643999591 2.71678728327 102% => OK
Unique words: 172.0 139.433497537 123% => OK
Unique words percentage: 0.549520766773 0.580463131201 95% => More unique words wanted or less content wanted.
syllable_count: 531.9 379.143842365 140% => OK
avg_syllables_per_word: 1.7 1.57093596059 108% => OK
A sentence (or a clause, phrase) starts by:
Pronoun: 4.0 4.6157635468 87% => OK
Article: 0.0 1.56157635468 0% => OK
Subordination: 2.0 1.71428571429 117% => OK
Conjunction: 1.0 0.931034482759 107% => OK
Preposition: 4.0 3.65517241379 109% => OK
Performance on sentences:
How many sentences: 13.0 12.6551724138 103% => OK
Sentence length: 24.0 20.5024630542 117% => OK
Sentence length SD: 59.4487497442 50.4703680194 118% => OK
Chars per sentence: 127.538461538 104.977214359 121% => OK
Words per sentence: 24.0769230769 20.9669160288 115% => OK
Discourse Markers: 8.07692307692 7.25397266985 111% => OK
Paragraphs: 4.0 4.12807881773 97% => OK
Language errors: 7.0 5.33497536946 131% => OK
Sentences with positive sentiment : 8.0 6.9802955665 115% => OK
Sentences with negative sentiment : 4.0 2.75862068966 145% => OK
Sentences with neutral sentiment: 1.0 2.91625615764 34% => More facts, knowledge or examples wanted.
What are sentences with positive/Negative/neutral sentiment?
Coherence and Cohesion:
Essay topic to essay body coherence: 0.319735359501 0.242375264174 132% => OK
Sentence topic coherence: 0.122591770173 0.0925447433944 132% => OK
Sentence topic coherence SD: 0.0773920493835 0.071462118173 108% => OK
Paragraph topic coherence: 0.193114738616 0.151781067708 127% => OK
Paragraph topic coherence SD: 0.0635456100101 0.0609392437508 104% => OK
Essay readability:
automated_readability_index: 15.6 12.6369458128 123% => OK
flesch_reading_ease: 38.66 53.1260098522 73% => OK
smog_index: 8.8 6.54236453202 135% => OK
flesch_kincaid_grade: 13.8 10.9458128079 126% => OK
coleman_liau_index: 13.76 11.5310837438 119% => OK
dale_chall_readability_score: 8.16 8.32886699507 98% => OK
difficult_words: 66.0 55.0591133005 120% => OK
linsear_write_formula: 14.0 9.94827586207 141% => OK
gunning_fog: 11.6 10.3980295567 112% => OK
text_standard: 14.0 10.5123152709 133% => OK
What are above readability scores?
---------------------
Rates: 80.0 out of 100
Scores by essay e-grader: 72.0 Out of 90
---------------------
Note: the e-grader does NOT examine the meaning of words and ideas. VIP users will receive further evaluations by advanced module of e-grader and human graders.