Medical technology is responsible for the human’s life expectancy. To what extent do you agree or disagree?
Recently, the phenomenon of advancement in medicine and its corresponding impacts has sparked a heated debate. Although contested by many that the beneficiary of medical technology is of importance, such issue is thoroughly both constructive and positive by a substantial number of individuals. I profoundly inclined to believe that using more advent hospital treatment can be a plus, and this essay will examine this view by providing some academic evidence before concluding.
From a healthcare standpoint, increasing human’s life expectancy can provide the society with some noticeable aspects which are rooted in the fact that advanced medical as well as high-tech healthy lifestyle, are inevitably bound up. Moreover, according to my own experience, when I was a student I involved in an academic survey about the healthcare system in modern countries, which lead to less infection rate among society. Thus, the beneficial ramification of both medical technology and preventative medicine can be seen apparently.
Within the realm of the immune system and individual healthcare, taking the responsibility for human life might increase the consequences of the different disease. Not to mention that some opponents of advancement in medicine tend to believe that this kind of technology might be brought many disadvantages as well. They performed an academic research conducted by Tehran University about increasing the detrimental effects of bio-medicine and genetic modified medical treatment which lead to many side-effects on patients.
To recapitulate, I pen down saying that although some opponents stand against medical advancement as an influential act of human, I highly inclined to believe that these technological improvements could lead to saving many lives and as a consequence lead to better healthy lifestyle with long life period.
Transition Words or Phrases used:
apparently, if, moreover, so, thus, well, kind of, as well as
Attributes: Values AverageValues Percentages(Values/AverageValues)% => Comments
Performance on Part of Speech:
To be verbs : 8.0 10.5418719212 76% => OK
Auxiliary verbs: 7.0 6.10837438424 115% => OK
Conjunction : 7.0 8.36945812808 84% => OK
Relative clauses : 11.0 5.94088669951 185% => OK
Pronoun: 19.0 20.9802955665 91% => OK
Preposition: 42.0 31.9359605911 132% => OK
Nominalization: 12.0 5.75862068966 208% => Less nominalizations (nouns with a suffix like: tion ment ence ance) wanted.
Performance on vocabulary words:
No of characters: 1587.0 1207.87684729 131% => OK
No of words: 279.0 242.827586207 115% => OK
Chars per words: 5.68817204301 5.00649968141 114% => OK
Fourth root words length: 4.08696624509 3.92707691288 104% => OK
Word Length SD: 3.23867604039 2.71678728327 119% => OK
Unique words: 168.0 139.433497537 120% => OK
Unique words percentage: 0.602150537634 0.580463131201 104% => OK
syllable_count: 511.2 379.143842365 135% => OK
avg_syllables_per_word: 1.8 1.57093596059 115% => OK
A sentence (or a clause, phrase) starts by:
Pronoun: 4.0 4.6157635468 87% => OK
Article: 2.0 1.56157635468 128% => OK
Subordination: 2.0 1.71428571429 117% => OK
Conjunction: 1.0 0.931034482759 107% => OK
Preposition: 4.0 3.65517241379 109% => OK
Performance on sentences:
How many sentences: 10.0 12.6551724138 79% => Need more sentences. Double check the format of sentences, make sure there is a space between two sentences, or have enough periods. And also check the lengths of sentences, maybe they are too long.
Sentence length: 27.0 20.5024630542 132% => The Avg. Sentence Length is relatively long.
Sentence length SD: 55.3656933489 50.4703680194 110% => OK
Chars per sentence: 158.7 104.977214359 151% => OK
Words per sentence: 27.9 20.9669160288 133% => OK
Discourse Markers: 6.1 7.25397266985 84% => OK
Paragraphs: 4.0 4.12807881773 97% => OK
Language errors: 0.0 5.33497536946 0% => OK
Sentences with positive sentiment : 5.0 6.9802955665 72% => OK
Sentences with negative sentiment : 1.0 2.75862068966 36% => More negative sentences wanted.
Sentences with neutral sentiment: 4.0 2.91625615764 137% => OK
What are sentences with positive/Negative/neutral sentiment?
Coherence and Cohesion:
Essay topic to essay body coherence: 0.148445226138 0.242375264174 61% => OK
Sentence topic coherence: 0.0588344899361 0.0925447433944 64% => OK
Sentence topic coherence SD: 0.0518716689759 0.071462118173 73% => OK
Paragraph topic coherence: 0.0904864707671 0.151781067708 60% => OK
Paragraph topic coherence SD: 0.0299077198675 0.0609392437508 49% => Paragraphs are similar to each other. Some content may get duplicated or it is not exactly right on the topic.
Essay readability:
automated_readability_index: 19.3 12.6369458128 153% => OK
flesch_reading_ease: 27.15 53.1260098522 51% => Flesch_reading_ease is low.
smog_index: 13.0 6.54236453202 199% => OK
flesch_kincaid_grade: 16.2 10.9458128079 148% => OK
coleman_liau_index: 16.02 11.5310837438 139% => OK
dale_chall_readability_score: 10.3 8.32886699507 124% => OK
difficult_words: 94.0 55.0591133005 171% => OK
linsear_write_formula: 15.0 9.94827586207 151% => OK
gunning_fog: 12.8 10.3980295567 123% => OK
text_standard: 13.0 10.5123152709 124% => OK
What are above readability scores?
---------------------
Rates: 88.8888888889 out of 100
Scores by essay e-grader: 80.0 Out of 90
---------------------
Note: the e-grader does NOT examine the meaning of words and ideas. VIP users will receive further evaluations by advanced module of e-grader and human graders.