The passage explained about decreasing and the extinction of frog that will treat the ecosystems and mankind; the passage then gives some solution for preventing this phenomenon. However, the lecture challenges these solutions and illustrates that these are not practical solutions because of some reasons.
First, the reading explains about Pesticide that is a chemical material for preventing insects to hurt the farms that attack the frog's body and cause breathing disease. The passage believes that the government should prohibit using this chemical material for preserving frogs. The lecture in contrary to the reading, states that preventing farmers to use these chemical materials is not economically practical and has many disadvantages for farmers consequently they will lose their crops.
Second, the lecture states that fungus that is spread in the world is very harmful to frogs and thicken their skin and prevent water absorption. Also mentions that this disease can be treated by heating that is the result of new research. The lecture is opposed to this idea and illustrates that this treatment is not practical because of two reasons. First, this method must apply to each frog individually and second, this treatment should be done on each new generation, therefore this will be extremely expensive.
Third, the passage blames the overusing of water by people and making buildings on lands and states that this cause the drought of frog's habitats. On the other hand, the professor's opinion in the lecture is that water use is not a great problem, but the main reason is the global warming. The professor also mentions that if people use less water and do not make buildings, the habitats of frog continue to dry because of global warming.
Finally, the professor believes that the solutions in the passage are not practical because they are not economically useful and global warming is the main reason for the extinction of frogs.
Grammar and spelling errors:
Line 3, column 145, Rule ID: SENT_START_CONJUNCTIVE_LINKING_ADVERB_COMMA[1]
Message: Did you forget a comma after a conjunctive/linking adverb?
Suggestion: Also,
...heir skin and prevent water absorption. Also mentions that this disease can be treat...
^^^^
Line 4, column 170, Rule ID: POSSESIVE_APOSTROPHE[1]
Message: Possible typo: apostrophe is missing. Did you mean 'professors'' or 'professor's'?
Suggestion: professors'; professor's
... frogs habitats. On the other hand, the professors opinion in the lecture is that water us...
^^^^^^^^^^
Transition Words or Phrases used:
also, but, consequently, finally, first, however, if, second, so, then, therefore, third, on the other hand
Attributes: Values AverageValues Percentages(Values/AverageValues)% => Comments
Performance on Part of Speech:
To be verbs : 17.0 10.4613686534 163% => OK
Auxiliary verbs: 7.0 5.04856512141 139% => OK
Conjunction : 14.0 7.30242825607 192% => OK
Relative clauses : 15.0 12.0772626932 124% => OK
Pronoun: 31.0 22.412803532 138% => Less pronouns wanted
Preposition: 27.0 30.3222958057 89% => OK
Nominalization: 8.0 5.01324503311 160% => OK
Performance on vocabulary words:
No of characters: 1640.0 1373.03311258 119% => OK
No of words: 315.0 270.72406181 116% => OK
Chars per words: 5.20634920635 5.08290768461 102% => OK
Fourth root words length: 4.21286593061 4.04702891845 104% => OK
Word Length SD: 2.63757754743 2.5805825403 102% => OK
Unique words: 143.0 145.348785872 98% => OK
Unique words percentage: 0.453968253968 0.540411800872 84% => More unique words wanted or less content wanted.
syllable_count: 498.6 419.366225166 119% => OK
avg_syllables_per_word: 1.6 1.55342163355 103% => OK
A sentence (or a clause, phrase) starts by:
Pronoun: 2.0 3.25607064018 61% => OK
Article: 13.0 8.23620309051 158% => OK
Subordination: 0.0 1.25165562914 0% => More adverbial clause wanted.
Conjunction: 1.0 1.51434878587 66% => OK
Preposition: 1.0 2.5761589404 39% => More preposition wanted as sentence beginning.
Performance on sentences:
How many sentences: 13.0 13.0662251656 99% => OK
Sentence length: 24.0 21.2450331126 113% => OK
Sentence length SD: 32.8646138002 49.2860985944 67% => OK
Chars per sentence: 126.153846154 110.228320801 114% => OK
Words per sentence: 24.2307692308 21.698381199 112% => OK
Discourse Markers: 8.23076923077 7.06452816374 117% => OK
Paragraphs: 5.0 4.09492273731 122% => OK
Language errors: 2.0 4.19205298013 48% => OK
Sentences with positive sentiment : 5.0 4.33554083885 115% => OK
Sentences with negative sentiment : 4.0 4.45695364238 90% => OK
Sentences with neutral sentiment: 4.0 4.27373068433 94% => OK
What are sentences with positive/Negative/neutral sentiment?
Coherence and Cohesion:
Essay topic to essay body coherence: 0.280006764262 0.272083759551 103% => OK
Sentence topic coherence: 0.111291695878 0.0996497079465 112% => OK
Sentence topic coherence SD: 0.0774920244751 0.0662205650399 117% => OK
Paragraph topic coherence: 0.151384456728 0.162205337803 93% => OK
Paragraph topic coherence SD: 0.0582679053962 0.0443174109184 131% => OK
Essay readability:
automated_readability_index: 15.2 13.3589403974 114% => OK
flesch_reading_ease: 47.12 53.8541721854 87% => OK
smog_index: 3.1 5.55761589404 56% => Smog_index is low.
flesch_kincaid_grade: 12.7 11.0289183223 115% => OK
coleman_liau_index: 13.23 12.2367328918 108% => OK
dale_chall_readability_score: 8.54 8.42419426049 101% => OK
difficult_words: 74.0 63.6247240618 116% => OK
linsear_write_formula: 10.5 10.7273730684 98% => OK
gunning_fog: 11.6 10.498013245 110% => OK
text_standard: 13.0 11.2008830022 116% => OK
What are above readability scores?
---------------------
Rates: 73.3333333333 out of 100
Scores by essay e-grader: 22.0 Out of 30
---------------------
Note: the e-grader does NOT examine the meaning of words and ideas. VIP users will receive further evaluations by advanced module of e-grader and human graders.