Today the quality of life in large cities is decreasing. Discuss the causes and solutions.

Essay topics:

Today the quality of life in large cities is decreasing. Discuss the causes and solutions.

In the modern epoch, urban regions are more crowded compared to the past, but the quality of life has been decreasing day by day. This essay rule out the causes of low quality urbanization and its solutions.
Firstly, increasing population and availability of amenities are the major causes. Increasing population is pulling the people to move on urban areas to find out a shelter, even though they don't get a better place for accommodation. Amazing facilities such as job opportunities,transportation,education facilities and the like are available at hands. Moreover,the life style is more fast in cities compared to the villages. Even though, the quality of life is poor in cities today. Diseases like Asthma,lung diseases and abdominal problems are more common due to air pollution,low quality food products and hygiene. Introduction of junk foods and lack of exercises reduces the quality of human life.
To overcome the above problems, people should find out their own time to improve their quality of life.They should maximum utilize the government facilities such as public transportation to reduce the air pollution and its after effects. They must avoid the over use of junk foods and should find out time for routine exercises. Government should be more strict and to give better punishment to prevent the production of low quality and unhygienic food supplies.
In conclusion, even though people are getting better amenities in urban areas, the quality of life is decreasing due to the crowd and unmanner usage of such facilities. People must take their own risk to improve their life quality. Better awareness about the causes and solutions can protect their life at a great extent.

Votes
Average: 7.3 (1 vote)

Comments

Grammar and spelling errors:
Line 2, column 190, Rule ID: EN_CONTRACTION_SPELLING
Message: Possible spelling mistake found
Suggestion: don't
...to find out a shelter, even though they dont get a better place for accommodation. A...
^^^^
Line 2, column 277, Rule ID: COMMA_PARENTHESIS_WHITESPACE
Message: Put a space after the comma
Suggestion: , transportation
...ing facilities such as job opportunities,transportation,education facilities and the like are a...
^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^
Line 2, column 359, Rule ID: COMMA_PARENTHESIS_WHITESPACE
Message: Put a space after the comma
Suggestion: , the
...he like are available at hands. Moreover,the life style is more fast in cities compa...
^^^^
Line 2, column 502, Rule ID: COMMA_PARENTHESIS_WHITESPACE
Message: Put a space after the comma
Suggestion: , lung
...or in cities today. Diseases like Asthma,lung diseases and abdominal problems are mor...
^^^^^
Line 2, column 576, Rule ID: COMMA_PARENTHESIS_WHITESPACE
Message: Put a space after the comma
Suggestion: , low
...ems are more common due to air pollution,low quality food products and hygiene. Intr...
^^^^
Line 3, column 103, Rule ID: SENTENCE_WHITESPACE
Message: Add a space between sentences
Suggestion: They
...n time to improve their quality of life.They should maximum utilize the government ...
^^^^
Line 3, column 145, Rule ID: WHITESPACE_RULE
Message: Possible typo: you repeated a whitespace
Suggestion:
...ey should maximum utilize the government facilities such as public transportation...
^^

Transition Words or Phrases used:
but, first, firstly, if, moreover, so, as to, in conclusion, such as

Attributes: Values AverageValues Percentages(Values/AverageValues)% => Comments

Performance on Part of Speech:
To be verbs : 11.0 13.1623246493 84% => OK
Auxiliary verbs: 7.0 7.85571142285 89% => OK
Conjunction : 13.0 10.4138276553 125% => OK
Relative clauses : 0.0 7.30460921844 0% => More relative clauses wanted.
Pronoun: 11.0 24.0651302605 46% => OK
Preposition: 44.0 41.998997996 105% => OK
Nominalization: 13.0 8.3376753507 156% => OK

Performance on vocabulary words:
No of characters: 1426.0 1615.20841683 88% => OK
No of words: 273.0 315.596192385 87% => More content wanted.
Chars per words: 5.22344322344 5.12529762239 102% => OK
Fourth root words length: 4.06481385082 4.20363070211 97% => OK
Word Length SD: 3.3827397559 2.80592935109 121% => OK
Unique words: 143.0 176.041082164 81% => More unique words wanted.
Unique words percentage: 0.52380952381 0.561755894193 93% => More unique words wanted or less content wanted.
syllable_count: 459.0 506.74238477 91% => OK
avg_syllables_per_word: 1.7 1.60771543086 106% => OK

A sentence (or a clause, phrase) starts by:
Pronoun: 3.0 5.43587174349 55% => OK
Article: 3.0 2.52805611222 119% => OK
Subordination: 3.0 2.10420841683 143% => OK
Conjunction: 1.0 0.809619238477 124% => OK
Preposition: 3.0 4.76152304609 63% => OK

Performance on sentences:
How many sentences: 15.0 16.0721442886 93% => OK
Sentence length: 18.0 20.2975951904 89% => OK
Sentence length SD: 46.6768560305 49.4020404114 94% => OK
Chars per sentence: 95.0666666667 106.682146367 89% => OK
Words per sentence: 18.2 20.7667163134 88% => OK
Discourse Markers: 4.53333333333 7.06120827912 64% => OK
Paragraphs: 4.0 4.38176352705 91% => OK
Language errors: 7.0 5.01903807615 139% => OK
Sentences with positive sentiment : 5.0 8.67935871743 58% => More positive sentences wanted.
Sentences with negative sentiment : 7.0 3.9879759519 176% => OK
Sentences with neutral sentiment: 3.0 3.4128256513 88% => OK
What are sentences with positive/Negative/neutral sentiment?

Coherence and Cohesion:
Essay topic to essay body coherence: 0.215145096936 0.244688304435 88% => OK
Sentence topic coherence: 0.0846969888408 0.084324248473 100% => OK
Sentence topic coherence SD: 0.0873633943565 0.0667982634062 131% => OK
Paragraph topic coherence: 0.135888828989 0.151304729494 90% => OK
Paragraph topic coherence SD: 0.0489478216641 0.056905535591 86% => OK

Essay readability:
automated_readability_index: 12.3 13.0946893788 94% => Automated_readability_index is low.
flesch_reading_ease: 44.75 50.2224549098 89% => OK
smog_index: 8.8 7.44779559118 118% => OK
flesch_kincaid_grade: 11.5 11.3001002004 102% => OK
coleman_liau_index: 13.0 12.4159519038 105% => OK
dale_chall_readability_score: 8.81 8.58950901804 103% => OK
difficult_words: 74.0 78.4519038076 94% => OK
linsear_write_formula: 9.0 9.78957915832 92% => OK
gunning_fog: 9.2 10.1190380762 91% => OK
text_standard: 9.0 10.7795591182 83% => OK
What are above readability scores?

---------------------

Rates: 73.0337078652 out of 100
Scores by essay e-grader: 6.5 Out of 9
---------------------
Note: the e-grader does NOT examine the meaning of words and ideas. VIP users will receive further evaluations by advanced module of e-grader and human graders.