Claim: Imagination is a more valuable asset than experience.
Reason: People who lack experience are free to imagine what is possible without the constraints of established habits and attitudes.
When we are talking about learning, accumulation and innovation would be the most important achievements for people. Someone argue that imagination is more crucial as it could create new ideas leads to innovation, at the same time, with repeating practice in the same field, the experiences accumulated seems redundant and not crucial than imagination. This is a controversial topic, after weigh both advantages and disadvantages, I most disagree with this issue.
Firstly, imagination without experiences will lead mindset goes to nowhere. One could lay in the coach and dreaming whole day long, however, without action and practice, the dream would only be the unrealistic daydream, and the discursion would just waste time and energy.
On the contrary, imagination based on experiences would leads people to create innovation. for instance, before the sparking apple falling on Newton's shoulder, Newton is an industrial student study in physical in Harvard university, without the experiences in the physical field, he might treat the apple same as all other people, he may pick it up to eat it but not pondering and figure out the universal gravitation. In another case, when Steve Jobs invent the brilliant product of personal computer, the experiences of calligraphy which he studied in the college inspired him to design the products with aesthetics, without the calligraphy lessons, he might cannot create such great products which could satisfy different users experiences. Accordingly, the experiences could buttress imagination transfer to innovation.
Someone may argue that experience would limit the imagination as people who are experts in a field would have constraints of established attitudes and habits. Admittedly, this is a common fact of experts or other experienced people, as they get used to their routine habit and mindset, sometimes they may get loth to change. Yet, this would not always be the case. Working on one field is easy to get bottleneck, one of the good methods to change that situation is jump out of the box or learning from other fields. Interdisciplinary is the best case to explain, experts could free their imagination and learn from other field during their research. At the same time, competition from peers would spur them to find a better solution. Thus, for the people who have constrains on imagine, as long as they would like to find out the solution, the recast of habit would always be the best choice for them.
Grammar and spelling errors:
Line 1, column 126, Rule ID: MASS_AGREEMENT[1]
Message: Consider using third-person verb forms for singular and mass nouns: 'argues'.
Suggestion: argues
...ortant achievements for people. Someone argue that imagination is more crucial as it ...
^^^^^
Line 1, column 126, Rule ID: HE_VERB_AGR[1]
Message: The pronoun 'Someone' must be used with a third-person verb: 'argues'.
Suggestion: argues
...ortant achievements for people. Someone argue that imagination is more crucial as it ...
^^^^^
Line 5, column 57, Rule ID: DID_BASEFORM[1]
Message: The verb 'would' requires the base form of the verb: 'lead'
Suggestion: lead
... imagination based on experiences would leads people to create innovation. for instan...
^^^^^
Line 5, column 92, Rule ID: UPPERCASE_SENTENCE_START
Message: This sentence does not start with an uppercase letter
Suggestion: For
...ould leads people to create innovation. for instance, before the sparking apple fal...
^^^
Line 7, column 73, Rule ID: WHO_NOUN[1]
Message: A noun should not follow "who". Try changing to a verb or maybe to 'who is a are'.
Suggestion: who is a are
...e would limit the imagination as people who are experts in a field would have constrain...
^^^^^^^
Transition Words or Phrases used:
accordingly, but, first, firstly, however, if, may, so, thus, for instance, talking about, on the contrary
Attributes: Values AverageValues Percentages(Values/AverageValues)% => Comments
Performance on Part of Speech:
To be verbs : 13.0 19.5258426966 67% => OK
Auxiliary verbs: 22.0 12.4196629213 177% => OK
Conjunction : 14.0 14.8657303371 94% => OK
Relative clauses : 9.0 11.3162921348 80% => More relative clauses wanted.
Pronoun: 25.0 33.0505617978 76% => OK
Preposition: 53.0 58.6224719101 90% => OK
Nominalization: 19.0 12.9106741573 147% => OK
Performance on vocabulary words:
No of characters: 2080.0 2235.4752809 93% => OK
No of words: 397.0 442.535393258 90% => More content wanted.
Chars per words: 5.23929471033 5.05705443957 104% => OK
Fourth root words length: 4.46372701284 4.55969084622 98% => OK
Word Length SD: 2.90073974394 2.79657885939 104% => OK
Unique words: 216.0 215.323595506 100% => OK
Unique words percentage: 0.544080604534 0.4932671777 110% => OK
syllable_count: 631.8 704.065955056 90% => OK
avg_syllables_per_word: 1.6 1.59117977528 101% => OK
A sentence (or a clause, phrase) starts by:
Pronoun: 7.0 6.24550561798 112% => OK
Article: 5.0 4.99550561798 100% => OK
Subordination: 6.0 3.10617977528 193% => OK
Conjunction: 1.0 1.77640449438 56% => OK
Preposition: 10.0 4.38483146067 228% => Less preposition wanted as sentence beginnings.
Performance on sentences:
How many sentences: 16.0 20.2370786517 79% => Need more sentences. Double check the format of sentences, make sure there is a space between two sentences, or have enough periods. And also check the lengths of sentences, maybe they are too long.
Sentence length: 24.0 23.0359550562 104% => OK
Sentence length SD: 81.2045786502 60.3974514979 134% => OK
Chars per sentence: 130.0 118.986275619 109% => OK
Words per sentence: 24.8125 23.4991977007 106% => OK
Discourse Markers: 6.625 5.21951772744 127% => OK
Paragraphs: 4.0 4.97078651685 80% => OK
Language errors: 5.0 7.80617977528 64% => OK
Sentences with positive sentiment : 11.0 10.2758426966 107% => OK
Sentences with negative sentiment : 2.0 5.13820224719 39% => More negative sentences wanted.
Sentences with neutral sentiment: 3.0 4.83258426966 62% => OK
What are sentences with positive/Negative/neutral sentiment?
Coherence and Cohesion:
Essay topic to essay body coherence: 0.17063201587 0.243740707755 70% => OK
Sentence topic coherence: 0.0644495630403 0.0831039109588 78% => OK
Sentence topic coherence SD: 0.0681101079345 0.0758088955206 90% => OK
Paragraph topic coherence: 0.0979117628803 0.150359130593 65% => OK
Paragraph topic coherence SD: 0.0168943543522 0.0667264976115 25% => Paragraphs are similar to each other. Some content may get duplicated or it is not exactly right on the topic.
Essay readability:
automated_readability_index: 15.7 14.1392134831 111% => OK
flesch_reading_ease: 47.12 48.8420337079 96% => OK
smog_index: 11.2 7.92365168539 141% => OK
flesch_kincaid_grade: 12.7 12.1743820225 104% => OK
coleman_liau_index: 13.41 12.1639044944 110% => OK
dale_chall_readability_score: 8.61 8.38706741573 103% => OK
difficult_words: 95.0 100.480337079 95% => OK
linsear_write_formula: 12.5 11.8971910112 105% => OK
gunning_fog: 11.6 11.2143820225 103% => OK
text_standard: 13.0 11.7820224719 110% => OK
What are above readability scores?
---------------------
Better to have 5/6 paragraphs with 3/4 arguments. And try always support/against one side but compare two sides, like this:
para 1: introduction
para 2: reason 1. address both of the views presented for reason 1
para 3: reason 2. address both of the views presented for reason 2
para 4: reason 3. address both of the views presented for reason 3
para 5: reason 4. address both of the views presented for reason 4 (optional)
para 6: conclusion.
Rates: 62.5 out of 100
Scores by essay e-grader: 3.75 Out of 6
---------------------
Note: the e-grader does NOT examine the meaning of words and ideas. VIP users will receive further evaluations by advanced module of e-grader and human graders.