Critical judgment of work in any given field has little value unless it comes from someone who is an expert in that field.
Along with technology developing in contemporary society, the world seems more complex. When we are facing difficult issue which exceed our own experiences, seeking for resolution from others' recommendation would be a faster method. Besides, peer’s competition would also raise questions for each other. Yet, whose opinion could be trusted? Someone argues that besides opinion from an expert, the suggestion has no value to take upon. This issue is definitely a controversial one, however, after weigh the disadvantages and advantages of this question, I mostly disagree with this claim.
Admittedly, opinions from experts are valuable based on their experiences and knowledge from their own field. For most cases, people are likely to ask an expert when they meet problem which they cannot fix it by themselves. For instance, people would prefer to buy some medication from pharmacies when they get fever, but when they are facing complex disease like diabetes, they would choose to go hospital for a diagnosis from the doctors. Without years accumulation of medical knowledge, one cannot just diagnosis by themselves and get a prescription. In this case, the judgement from experts are definitely cannot be ignorance and replaced by a non-specialist.
However, experts also have their limits at some point. When the issue occurs to the field which is closer to general public, ideas from non-specialists would also provide some sparkling ideas. For example, Union company once hire experts to fix a problem of examine empty boxes on the convey belt in the soap producing workshop. Those engineers dig on different machines and formulates to solve the question by several months. A wonderful idea comes from a non-specialist solved this issue, he suggests putting a huge fan beside the convey belt, let the wind blow off those empty boxes. Accordingly, some cases could be solved by non-specialists perfectly as well.
Besides the occasional sparkling idea from other fields, the judgement from peers is also important. Let's see in the enterprise, competition from different companies to win one bid or same market region is common. When evaluate which products or services are better winner, critical judgement from peers would come up. It is the best time to learn from others, and crucial moment to review themselves for the company when they are in face to face competition. Competition and judgement from peers help the enterprise go further.
To conclusion, whether opinions are from a non-specialist or specialist, those critical judgement are same important, those opinions could provide another unexpected aspect for you to evaluate. What weighs more is the critical mindset of oneself, the ability to distinct and balance between comprehensive information.
Grammar and spelling errors:
Line 5, column 110, Rule ID: GENERAL_XX[1]
Message: Use simply 'public'.
Suggestion: public
... occurs to the field which is closer to general public, ideas from non-specialists would also ...
^^^^^^^^^^^^^^
Line 5, column 282, Rule ID: A_INFINITVE[1]
Message: Probably a wrong construction: a/the + infinitive
...fix a problem of examine empty boxes on the convey belt in the soap producing workshop. Th...
^^^^^^^^^^
Line 5, column 530, Rule ID: A_INFINITVE[1]
Message: Probably a wrong construction: a/the + infinitive
..., he suggests putting a huge fan beside the convey belt, let the wind blow off those empty...
^^^^^^^^^^
Line 7, column 102, Rule ID: LETS_LET[1]
Message: Did you mean 'Let's'?
Suggestion: Let's
...judgement from peers is also important. Lets see in the enterprise, competition from...
^^^^
Transition Words or Phrases used:
accordingly, also, besides, but, however, if, so, well, for example, for instance
Attributes: Values AverageValues Percentages(Values/AverageValues)% => Comments
Performance on Part of Speech:
To be verbs : 19.0 19.5258426966 97% => OK
Auxiliary verbs: 12.0 12.4196629213 97% => OK
Conjunction : 12.0 14.8657303371 81% => OK
Relative clauses : 13.0 11.3162921348 115% => OK
Pronoun: 30.0 33.0505617978 91% => OK
Preposition: 61.0 58.6224719101 104% => OK
Nominalization: 21.0 12.9106741573 163% => OK
Performance on vocabulary words:
No of characters: 2350.0 2235.4752809 105% => OK
No of words: 435.0 442.535393258 98% => OK
Chars per words: 5.40229885057 5.05705443957 107% => OK
Fourth root words length: 4.56690854021 4.55969084622 100% => OK
Word Length SD: 2.91917275269 2.79657885939 104% => OK
Unique words: 248.0 215.323595506 115% => OK
Unique words percentage: 0.570114942529 0.4932671777 116% => OK
syllable_count: 729.0 704.065955056 104% => OK
avg_syllables_per_word: 1.7 1.59117977528 107% => OK
A sentence (or a clause, phrase) starts by:
Pronoun: 8.0 6.24550561798 128% => OK
Article: 6.0 4.99550561798 120% => OK
Subordination: 4.0 3.10617977528 129% => OK
Conjunction: 2.0 1.77640449438 113% => OK
Preposition: 6.0 4.38483146067 137% => OK
Performance on sentences:
How many sentences: 24.0 20.2370786517 119% => OK
Sentence length: 18.0 23.0359550562 78% => The Avg. Sentence Length is relatively short.
Sentence length SD: 40.435970476 60.3974514979 67% => OK
Chars per sentence: 97.9166666667 118.986275619 82% => OK
Words per sentence: 18.125 23.4991977007 77% => OK
Discourse Markers: 3.375 5.21951772744 65% => OK
Paragraphs: 5.0 4.97078651685 101% => OK
Language errors: 4.0 7.80617977528 51% => OK
Sentences with positive sentiment : 14.0 10.2758426966 136% => OK
Sentences with negative sentiment : 6.0 5.13820224719 117% => OK
Sentences with neutral sentiment: 4.0 4.83258426966 83% => OK
What are sentences with positive/Negative/neutral sentiment?
Coherence and Cohesion:
Essay topic to essay body coherence: 0.161941469139 0.243740707755 66% => OK
Sentence topic coherence: 0.0482901688067 0.0831039109588 58% => OK
Sentence topic coherence SD: 0.0524332408158 0.0758088955206 69% => OK
Paragraph topic coherence: 0.0889334565157 0.150359130593 59% => OK
Paragraph topic coherence SD: 0.0214238523555 0.0667264976115 32% => Paragraphs are similar to each other. Some content may get duplicated or it is not exactly right on the topic.
Essay readability:
automated_readability_index: 13.1 14.1392134831 93% => Automated_readability_index is low.
flesch_reading_ease: 44.75 48.8420337079 92% => OK
smog_index: 8.8 7.92365168539 111% => OK
flesch_kincaid_grade: 11.5 12.1743820225 94% => OK
coleman_liau_index: 13.74 12.1639044944 113% => OK
dale_chall_readability_score: 8.99 8.38706741573 107% => OK
difficult_words: 123.0 100.480337079 122% => OK
linsear_write_formula: 8.0 11.8971910112 67% => OK
gunning_fog: 9.2 11.2143820225 82% => OK
text_standard: 9.0 11.7820224719 76% => OK
What are above readability scores?
---------------------
Rates: 70.83 out of 100
Scores by essay e-grader: 4.25 Out of 6
---------------------
Note: the e-grader does NOT examine the meaning of words and ideas. VIP users will receive further evaluations by advanced module of e-grader and human graders.