Businesses should hire employees for their entire lives. Do you agree or disagree? Use specific reasons and examples to support your answer. Do you agree or disagree with the following statement?
Business consistence of different organization which requires various teams and large number of people to reach their goals. Experts have studied different aspects of businesses to understand the key elements of success in this trend. According to me, changing the staff member as per the requirement is one of the best ways to achieve success. I will shed light on my point of view in the ensuing paragraphs.
First, demerit is that the growth of profits will be influenced by the performance of employees. Since, we hire the employees for lifetime that makes the job security very high and that further leads to less efficient performance by the staff. Not working efficiently causes the members to lose their motivation to provide innovative ideas. After a while, overall productivity decreases. Under such condition, after a few years, if a business fails, whole company and its members will reach the point where no solutions are able to reverse the situation.
Secondly, technology has shown immense growth during the last century and it's improving day after day. For the better efficiency and output, companies must use new machines and it requires new knowledge in that field which normally new worker generation can provide. On the other side, if the company keep employees forever, the young generation won’t have enough opportunity to show their talents. And there will lack of advance knowledge in the market.
Let’s put in a nutshell, by working in different companies, individuals can obtain valuable experience and increases the performance, profit, and productivity of the company.
Grammar and spelling errors:
Line 1, column 236, Rule ID: ACCORDING_TO_ME[1]
Message: This phrase can sound awkward in English. Consider using 'in my opinion' or 'I think'.
Suggestion: In my opinion; I think
... key elements of success in this trend. According to me, changing the staff member as per the r...
^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^
Line 5, column 75, Rule ID: IT_IS[7]
Message: Did you mean 'it's' (='it is') instead of 'its' (possessive pronoun)?
Suggestion: it's; it is
...ense growth during the last century and its improving day after day. For the better...
^^^
Line 6, column 1, Rule ID: WHITESPACE_RULE
Message: Possible typo: you repeated a whitespace
Suggestion:
...ck of advance knowledge in the market. Let's put in a nutshell, by working...
^^^
Transition Words or Phrases used:
first, if, second, secondly, so, while
Attributes: Values AverageValues Percentages(Values/AverageValues)% => Comments
Performance on Part of Speech:
To be verbs : 4.0 15.1003584229 26% => More to be verbs wanted.
Auxiliary verbs: 7.0 9.8082437276 71% => OK
Conjunction : 9.0 13.8261648746 65% => OK
Relative clauses : 7.0 11.0286738351 63% => More relative clauses wanted.
Pronoun: 15.0 43.0788530466 35% => OK
Preposition: 35.0 52.1666666667 67% => OK
Nominalization: 13.0 8.0752688172 161% => OK
Performance on vocabulary words:
No of characters: 1363.0 1977.66487455 69% => OK
No of words: 256.0 407.700716846 63% => More content wanted.
Chars per words: 5.32421875 4.8611393121 110% => OK
Fourth root words length: 4.0 4.48103885553 89% => OK
Word Length SD: 2.84110614995 2.67179642975 106% => OK
Unique words: 166.0 212.727598566 78% => More unique words wanted.
Unique words percentage: 0.6484375 0.524837075471 124% => OK
syllable_count: 415.8 618.680645161 67% => OK
avg_syllables_per_word: 1.6 1.51630824373 106% => OK
A sentence (or a clause, phrase) starts by:
Pronoun: 2.0 9.59856630824 21% => OK
Article: 1.0 3.08781362007 32% => OK
Subordination: 4.0 3.51792114695 114% => OK
Conjunction: 2.0 1.86738351254 107% => OK
Preposition: 6.0 4.94265232975 121% => OK
Performance on sentences:
How many sentences: 14.0 20.6003584229 68% => Need more sentences. Double check the format of sentences, make sure there is a space between two sentences, or have enough periods. And also check the lengths of sentences, maybe they are too long.
Sentence length: 18.0 20.1344086022 89% => OK
Sentence length SD: 39.9850099463 48.9658058833 82% => OK
Chars per sentence: 97.3571428571 100.406767564 97% => OK
Words per sentence: 18.2857142857 20.6045352989 89% => OK
Discourse Markers: 2.71428571429 5.45110844103 50% => More transition words/phrases wanted.
Paragraphs: 4.0 4.53405017921 88% => OK
Language errors: 3.0 5.5376344086 54% => OK
Sentences with positive sentiment : 10.0 11.8709677419 84% => OK
Sentences with negative sentiment : 2.0 3.85842293907 52% => More negative sentences wanted.
Sentences with neutral sentiment: 2.0 4.88709677419 41% => OK
What are sentences with positive/Negative/neutral sentiment?
Coherence and Cohesion:
Essay topic to essay body coherence: 0.0664631271778 0.236089414692 28% => The similarity between the topic and the content is low.
Sentence topic coherence: 0.0193309788111 0.076458572812 25% => Sentence topic similarity is low.
Sentence topic coherence SD: 0.0221644644377 0.0737576698707 30% => Sentences are similar to each other.
Paragraph topic coherence: 0.0337296268122 0.150856017488 22% => Maybe some paragraphs are off the topic.
Paragraph topic coherence SD: 0.0204131753007 0.0645574589148 32% => Paragraphs are similar to each other. Some content may get duplicated or it is not exactly right on the topic.
Essay readability:
automated_readability_index: 12.8 11.7677419355 109% => OK
flesch_reading_ease: 53.21 58.1214874552 92% => OK
smog_index: 8.8 6.10430107527 144% => OK
flesch_kincaid_grade: 10.3 10.1575268817 101% => OK
coleman_liau_index: 13.58 10.9000537634 125% => OK
dale_chall_readability_score: 9.16 8.01818996416 114% => OK
difficult_words: 75.0 86.8835125448 86% => OK
linsear_write_formula: 8.0 10.002688172 80% => OK
gunning_fog: 9.2 10.0537634409 92% => OK
text_standard: 10.0 10.247311828 98% => OK
What are above readability scores?
---------------------
We are expecting: No. of Words: 350 while No. of Different Words: 200
Better to have 5 paragraphs with 3 arguments. And try always support/against one side but compare two sides, like this:
para 1: introduction
para 2: reason 1. address both of the views presented for reason 1
para 3: reason 2. address both of the views presented for reason 2
para 4: reason 3. address both of the views presented for reason 3
para 5: conclusion.
So how to find out those reasons. There is a formula:
reasons == advantages or
reasons == disadvantages
for example, we can always apply 'save time', 'save/make money', 'find a job', 'make friends', 'get more information' as reasons to all essay/speaking topics.
or we can apply 'waste time', 'waste money', 'no job', 'make bad friends', 'get bad information' as reasons to all essay/speaking topics.
More content wanted.
It is not exactly right on the topic in the view of e-grader. Maybe there is a wrong essay topic.
Rates: 3.33333333333 out of 100
Scores by essay e-grader: 1.0 Out of 30
---------------------
Note: the e-grader does NOT examine the meaning of words and ideas. VIP users will receive further evaluations by advanced module of e-grader and human graders.